Erratum to: Can enemy release explain the invasion success of the diploid Leucanthemum vulgare in North America? (Biol Invasions, (2016), 18, (2077–2091), 10.1007/s10530-016-1152-z);Can enemy release explain the invasion success of the diploid Leucanthemum vulgare in North America?

Biological Invasions

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 2077-2091

  Stutz, Sonja ^a,b   Štajerová, Kateřina ^c,d   Hinz, Hariet L ^a   Müller Schärer, Heinz ^b   Schaffner, Urs ^a  

^a CABI   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Enemy release; Herbivores; Oxeye daisy; Plant invasions; Polyploidy

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DICOTYLEDON; ENEMY RELEASE HYPOTHESIS; HERBIVORY; INVASIVENESS; INVERTEBRATE; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PLANT COMMUNITY; POLYPLOIDY; POPULATION ESTIMATION;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

ADONIS VERNALIS; INVERTEBRATA; LEUCANTHEMUM; LEUCANTHEMUM VULGARE;

EID: 84964654792     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: 15731464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-017-1402-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (87)

1. Adams JM, Fang W, Callaway RM, Cipollini D, Newell E (2009) A cross-continental test of the enemy release hypothesis: leaf herbivory on Acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe. Biol Invasions 11:1005–1016
2. Alba C, Hufbauer R (2012) Exploring the potential for climatic factors, herbivory, and co-occurring vegetation to shape performance in native and introduced populations of Verbascum thapsus. Biol Invasions 14:2505–2518
3. Anderson RS, Korotyaev BA (2004) Some Palearctic weevils in the subfamily Ceutorhynchinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) recently discovered in North America. Can. Entomol. 136:233–239
4. Arvanitis L, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J (2007) Butterfly seed predation: effects of landscape characteristics, plant ploidy level and population structure. Oecologia 152:275–285
5. Arvanitis L, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J (2008) Plant ploidy level influences selection by butterfly seed predators. Oikos 117:1020–1025
6. Arvanitis L, Wiklund C, Münzbergová Z, Dahlgren Ehrlén J (2010) Novel antagonistic interactions associated with plant polyploidization influence trait selection and habitat preference. Ecol Lett 13:330–337
7. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7
8. Blaisdell GK, Roy BA (2014) Two tests of enemy release of commonly co-occurring bunchgrasses native in Europe and introduced in the United States. Biol Invasions 16:833–842
9. Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants—a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889
10. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11
11. Broz AK, Manter DK, Bowman G, Müller-Schärer H, Vivanco JM (2009) Plant origin and ploidy influence gene expression and life cycle characteristics in an invasive weed. BMC Plant Biol 9:33
12. Callaway RM, Waller LP, Diaconu A, Pal R, Collins AR, Mueller-Schaerer H, Maron JL (2011) Escape from competition: neighbors reduce Centaurea stoebe performance at home but not away. Ecology 92:2208–2213
13. Castells E, Morante M, Blanco-Moreno JM, Sans FX, Vilatersana R, Blasco-Moreno A (2013) Reduced seed predation after invasion supports enemy release in a broad biogeographical survey. Oecologia 173:1397–1409
14. Clements DR, Cole DE, Darbyshire S, King J, McClay A (2004) The biology of Canadian weeds. 128. Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. Can J Plant Sci 84:343–363
15. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733
16. Comai L (2005) The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet 6:836–846
17. Crawley MJ (1986) The population ecology of invaders. Philos Trans R Soc B 314:711–731
18. Cripps MG, Edwards GR, Bourdot GW, Saville DJ, Hinz HL, Fowler SV (2010) Enemy release does not increase performance of Cirsium arvense in New Zealand. Plant Ecol 209:123–134
19. Cronin JT, Bhattarai GP, Allen WJ, Meyerson LA (2015) Biogeography of a plant invasion: plant–herbivore interactions. Ecology 96:1115–1127
20. DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Ickes K (2004) Natural-enemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85:471–483
21. Dhawan OP, Lavania UC (1996) Enhancing the productivity of secondary metabolites via induced polyploidy: a review. Euphytica 87:81–89
22. Dix ME, Tagestad AD, Stein JD, Jacobson M (1984) Detecting tip mining Olethreutinae (Tortricidae) moths in the northern and central Great Plains with synthetic attractants. USDA Forest Service Research Note 445. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins
23. Douglas H, Bouchard P, Anderson RS, de Tonnancour P, Vigneault R, Webster RP (2013) New Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) records for Canada. Zookeys 309:13–48
24. Ebeling SK, Hensen I, Auge H (2008) The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range. Divers Distrib 14:225–233
25. Erfmeier A, Bruelheide H (2004) Comparison of native and invasive Rhododendron ponticum populations: growth, reproduction and morphology under field conditions. Flora 199:120–133
26. Fernald ML (1903) Chrysanthemum leucanthemum and the American white weed. Rhodora 5:177–181
27. Gassmann A (1996) Classical biological control of weeds with insects: a case for emphasizing agent demography. In: Moran VC, Hoffmann JH (eds) International symposium on the biological control of weeds. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, pp 171–175
28. Greuter W (2006) Compositae (pro parte majore). In: Greuter W, Raab-Straube E von (eds): Compositae. Euro + Med Plantbase—the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed. Accessed 7 May 2015
29. Guillet G, Arnason JT (1995) Some phytophagous insects found on Rudbeckia hirta and Chrysanthemum leucanthemum in the Ottawa/Hull area. Proc Entomol Soc Ont 126:95–97
30. Hahn MA, Buckley YM, Müller-Schärer H (2012a) Increased population growth rate in invasive polyploid Centaurea stoebe in a common garden. Ecol Lett 15:947–954
31. Hahn MA, van Kleunen M, Müller-Schärer H (2012b) Increased phenotypic plasticity to climate may have boosted the invasion success of polyploid Centaurea stoebe. PLoS One 7:e50284
32. Halverson K, Heard SB, Nason JD, Stireman JO (2008) Differential attack on diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid Solidago altissima L. by five insect gallmakers. Oecologia 154:755–761
33. Heger T, Jeschke JM (2014) The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses. Oikos 123:741–750
34. Hegi G (1987) Compositae 2, Matricaria–Hieracium. In: Wagenitz G (ed) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Pteridophyta, Spermatophyta. Volume VI. Angiospermae, Dicotyledones 4, 3rd edn. Paul Parey, Berlin
35. Heywood VH (1976) Leucanthemum Mill. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH (eds) Flora Europaea 4. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 174–177
36. Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5–15
37. Hinz HL, Schwarzlaender M (2004) Comparing invasive plants from their native and exotic range: what can we learn for biological control? Weed Technol 18:1533–1541
38. Hinz HL, Schwarzländer M, McKenney JL, Cripps MG, Harmon B, Price WJ (2012) Biogeographical comparison of the invasive Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges. Biol Invasions 14:1999–2016
39. Holm L, Pancho JV, Herberger JP, Plucknett DL (1979) A geographical atlas of world weeds. Wiley, New York
40. Jakobs G, Weber E, Edwards PJ (2004) Introduced plants of the invasive Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) are larger and grow denser than conspecifics in the native range. Divers Distrib 10:11–19
41. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170
42. Khuroo AA, Malik AH, Reshi ZA, Dar GH (2010) From ornamental to detrimental: plant invasion of Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. (Ox-eye Daisy) in Kashmir valley, India. Curr Sci 98:600–602
43. König MAE, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J (2014) Context-dependent resistance against butterfly herbivory in a polyploid herb. Oecologia 174:1265–1272
44. Kubátová B, Trávníček P, Bastlová D, Čurn V, Jarolímová V, Suda J (2008) DNA ploidy-level variation in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria at a large geographical scale. J Biogeogr 35:167–176
45. Lafuma L, Balkwill K, Imbert E et al (2003) Ploidy level and origin of the European invasive weed Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 243:59–72
46. Lavoie C, Saint-Louis A, Guay G, Groeneveld E, Villeneuve P (2012) Naturalization of exotic plant species in north-eastern North America: trends and detection capacity. Divers Distrib 18:180–190
47. Levin DA (1983) Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Am Nat 122:1–25
48. Lewis KC, Bazzaz FA, Liao Q, Orians CM (2006) Geographic patterns of herbivory and resource allocation to defense, growth, and reproduction in an invasive biennial, Alliaria petiolata. Oecologia 148:384–395
49. Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Invasions 8:1535–1545
50. Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Doležel J, Santos C (2007) Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: a test with 37 species. Ann Bot 100:875–888
51. Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373
52. Maurel N, Fujiyoshi M, Muratet A, Porcher E, Motard E, Gargominy O, Machon N (2013) Biogeographic comparisons of herbivore attack, growth and impact of Japanese knotweed between Japan and France. J Ecol 101:118–127
53. McClay AS, Stutz S, Schaffner U (2013) Leucanthemum vulgare Lam., Oxeye Daisy (Asteraceae). In: Mason P, Gillespie DR (eds) Biological control programmes in Canada 2001–2012. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 337–340
54. Miller WE (1983) New synonymies in nearctic Dichrorampha (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 85:727–733
55. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U (2008) Classical biological control: exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions. Biol Invasions 10:859–874
56. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19:417–422
57. Mulligan GA (1958) Chromosome races in the Chrysanthemum leucanthemum complex. Rhodora 60:122–125
58. Münzbergová Z (2006) Ploidy level interacts with population size and habitat conditions to determine the degree of herbivory damage in plant populations. Oikos 115:443–452
59. Münzbergová Z, Skuhrovec J, Maršík P (2015) Large differences in the composition of herbivore communities and seed damage in diploid and autotetraploid plant species. Biol J Linn Soc 115:270–287
60. Nuismer SL, Thompson JN (2001) Plant polyploidy and non-uniform effects on insect herbivores. Proc R Soc B 268:1937–1940
61. Oberprieler C, Eder C, Meister J, Vogt R (2011) AFLP fingerprinting suggests an allopolyploid origin of two members of the Leucanthemum vulgare aggregate (Compositae, Anthemideae) in central Europe. Nord J Bot 29:370–377
62. Olson BE, Wallander RT (1999) Oxeye daisy. In: Sheley RL, Petroff K (eds) Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 282–289
63. Pandit MK, Pocock MJO, Kunin WE (2011) Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants. J Ecol 99:1108–1115
64. Pandit MK, White SM, Pocock MJO (2014) The contrasting effects of genome size, chromosome number and ploidy level on plant invasiveness: a global analysis. New Phytol 203:697–703
65. Parker JD, Torchin ME, Hufbauer RA et al (2013) Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? Ecology 94:985–994
66. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2014). nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-118
67. Prior KM, Powell THQ, Joseph AL, Hellmann JJ (2015) Insights from community ecology into the role of enemy release in causing invasion success: the importance of native enemy effects. Biol Invasions 17:1283–1297
68. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
69. Ramsey J, Ramsey TS (2014) Ecological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 369:20130352
70. Razowski J (2003) Tortricidae of Europe: Olethreutinae, vol 2. František Slamka, Bratislava
71. Richardson ML, Hanks LM (2011) Differences in spatial distribution, morphology, and communities of herbivorous insects among three cytotypes of Solidago altissima (Asteraceae) Am. J Bot 98:1595–1601
72. Roberts MA (1991) Two palearctic species of Dichrorampha discovered in Maine (Tortricidae). J Lepid Soc 45:169–171
73. Roberts MA, Miller W (2003) First report of the Palaearctic Dichrorampha acuminatana (Lienig & Zeller) in North America (Tortricidae). J Lepid Soc 57:152–153
74. Roy BA, Coulson T, Blaser W, Policha T, Stewart JL, Blasdell GK, Güsewell S (2011) Population regulation by enemies of the grass Brachypodium sylvaticum: demography in native and invaded ranges. Ecology 92:665–675
75. Schlaepfer DR, Edwards PJ, Semple JC, Billeter R (2008) Cytogeography of Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) and its invasive ploidy level. J Biogeogr 35:2119–2127
76. Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2000) The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7051–7057
77. Stewart K, Bourn N, Thomas J (2001) An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. J Appl Ecol 38:1148–1154
78. te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Brysting AK, Suda J, Kubešová M, Pyšek P (2012) The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Ann Bot 109:19–45
79. Thompson JN, Cunningham BM, Segraves KA, Althoff DM, Wagner D (1997) Plant polyploidy and insect/plant interactions. Am Nat 150:730–743
80. Treier UA, Broennimann O, Normand S, Guisan A, Schaffner U, Steinger T, Müller-Schärer H (2009) Shift in cytotype frequency and niche space in the invasive plant Centaurea maculosa. Ecology 90:1366–1377
81. USDA, NRCS (2015) The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed 7 May 2015
82. Vilà M, Maron JL, Marco L (2005) Evidence for the enemy release hypothesis in Hypericum perforatum. Oecologia 142:474–479
83. Vogt R (1991) Die Gattung Leucanthemum Mill. (Compositae Anthemideae) auf der Iberischen Halbinsel. Ruizia 10:1–261
84. Williams JL, Auge H, Maron JL (2010) Testing hypotheses for exotic plant success: parallel experiments in the native and introduced ranges. Ecology 91:1355–1366
85. Wolfe LM (2002) Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. Am Nat 160:705–711
86. Zelený V (1982) Kopretina bílá (Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. complex) v Československu. Academia, Prague
87. Zelený V (2004) Leucanthemum Mill. In: Slavík B, Štěpánková J (eds) Květena České republiky [Flora of the Czech Republic], vol 7. Academia, Prague, pp 236–242