Testing hypotheses for exotic plant success: Parallel experiments in the native and introduced ranges

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1355-1366

  Williams, Jennifer L ^a,c   Auge, Harald ^b   Maron, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cynoglossum officinale; Disturbance; Escape from enemies; Germany; Herbivory; Integral projection model (IPM); Life table response experiment (LTRE); Montana, USA; Native and introduced ranges; Plant demography; Saxony anhalt

Indexed keywords

INSECTICIDE;

ABUNDANCE; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FECUNDITY; GROWTH RATE; HERBIVORE; HERBIVORY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INSECT; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PARAMETERIZATION; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING; SPECIALIST;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BORAGINACEAE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG EFFECT; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INSECT; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY;

ANIMALS; BORAGINACEAE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INSECTICIDES; INSECTS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY;

GERMANY; MONTANA; UNITED STATES;

CYNOGLOSSUM OFFICINALE; HEXAPODA;

EID: 77749302084     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/08-2142.1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:1-24.
2. Boorman, L. A., and R. M. Fuller. 1984. The comparative ecology of two sand dune biennials: Lactuca virosa L. and Cynoglossum officinale L. New Phytologist 69:609-629.
3. Britton-Simmonsi K. H., and K. C. Abbott. 2008. Short- and long-term, effects of disturbance and propagule pressure on a biological invasion. Journal of Ecology 96:68-77. (Pubitemid 350256573)
4. Burns, J. H. 2008. Demographic performance predicts invasiveness of species in the Commelinaceae under high-nutrient conditions. Ecological Applications 18:335-346.
5. Caswell, H. 2001, Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Second edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
6. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528-534.
7. De Clerck-Floate, R., and B. Wikeem. 2009. Influence of release size on establishment and impact of a root weevil for the biocontrol of houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale). Biocontrol Science and Technology 19:169-183.
8. De Jong, T. J., and. P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1988. Population ecology of the biennials Cirsium vulgare and Cynoglossum officinale in a coastal sand-dune area. Journal of Ecology 76: 366-382.
9. De Jong, T. J., P. G. L. Klinkhamer, and L. A. Boorman. 1990. Biological flora of the British Isles: Cynoglossum officinale L. Journal of Ecology 78:1123-1144.
10. DeWaIt, S. J., J. S. Denslow, and. K, Ickes. 2004. Naturalenemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85:471-483.
11. Easterling, M. R., S. P. Ellner, and P. M. Dixon. 2000. Sizespecific sensitivity: applying a new structured population model. Ecology 81:694-708.
12. Ellner, S. P., and M. Rees. 2006. Integral projection models for species with complex demography. American Naturalist 167: 410-428.
13. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by plants and animals. Methuen, London, UK.
14. Franco, M., and J. Silvertown. 2004. A comparative demography of plants based upon elasticities of vital rates. Ecology 85:531-538. (Pubitemid 38319119)
15. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, UK.
16. Hierro, J. L., J. L. Maron, and R. M. Callaway. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: The importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology 93:5-15.
17. Hierro, J. L., D. Villarreal, Ö. Eren, J. M. Graham, and R. M. Callaway. 2006. Disturbance facilitates invasion: The effects are stronger abroad than at home. American Naturalist 168: 144-156. (Pubitemid 44246211)
18. Hobbs, R. J. 1989. The nature and effects of disturbance relative to invasions. Pages 389-405 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. H. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions: a global, perspective. Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
19. Hobbs, R. J., and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324-337. (Pubitemid 23403012)
20. Jongejans, E., A. W. Sheppard, and K. Shea. 2006. What controls the population dynamics of the invasive thistle Carduus nutans in its native range? Journal of Applied Ecology 43:877-886.
21. Keane, R. M., and M. J. Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:164-170. (Pubitemid 34219309)
22. Kellogg, C. H., and. S. D. Bridgham. 2004. Disturbance, herbivory, and propagule dispersal control dominance of an invasive grass. Biological Invasions 6:319-329.
23. Lockwood, J. L., M. F. Hoopes, and M. P. Marchetti. 2007. Invasion ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Maiden, Massachusetts, USA.
24. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689-710.
25. Maron, J. L., and E. E. Crone. 2006. Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273:2575-2584.
26. Maron, J. L., and M. Vilà. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361-373.
27. MathWorks. 2004. Matlab. Release 14. MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
28. Memmott, J., S. V. Fowler, Q. Paynter, A. W. Sheppard, and P. Syrett. 2000. The invertebrate fauna on broom, Cytisus scoparius, in two native and two exotic habitats. Acta Oecologia 21:213-222.
29. Mitchell, C. E., and A. G. Power. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625-627.
30. Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
31. Parker, I. M. 2001, Safe site and seed limitation in Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom): invasibility, disturbance, and the role of cryptogams in a glacial outwash prairie. Biological Invasions 3:323-332.
32. Prins, A. H., H. W. Nell, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1992. Sizedependent root herbivory on Cynoglossum officinale. Oikos 65:409-413.
33. Rees, M., D. Z. Childs, C. J. E. Metcalf, K. E. Rose, A. W. Sheppard, and P. J. Grubb. 2006. Seed dormancy and delayed flowering in monocarpic plants: selective interactions in a stochastic environment. American Naturalist 168:E53-E71.
34. Reinhart, K. O., A. Packer, W. H. Van der Putten, and K. Clay. 2003. Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black, cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecology Letters 6:1046-1050.
35. SAS Institute. 2003. Proc GLM. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
36. Schwankender, M. 1997. Bionomics of Mogulones cruciger (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a below-ground herbivore for the biological control of hound's-tongue. Environmental Entomology 26:357-365.
37. Schwarzlaender, M. 2000. Host specificity of Longitarsus quadriguttatus Pont., a below-ground herbivore for the biological control of houndstongue. Biological Control 18: 18-26.
38. Seabloom, E. W., W. S. Harpole, O. J. Reichman, and D. Tilman. 2003. Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:13384-13389.
39. Shea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:170-176. (Pubitemid 34219310)
40. Sletvold, N., and K. Rydgren. 2007. Population dynamics in Digitalis purpurea: The interaction of disturbance and seed bank dynamics. Journal of Ecology 95:1346-1359.
41. Torchin, M. E., K. D. Lafferty, A. P. Dobson, V. J. McKenzie, and A. M. Kuris. 2003. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421:628-630.
42. Upadhyaya, M. K., H. R. Tilsner, and M. D. Pitt. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 87. Cynoglossum officinale L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68:763-774.
43. Vilà, M., J. L. Maron, and L. Marco. 2005. Evidence for the enemy release hypothesis in Hypericum perforatum. Oecologia 142:474-479.
44. Williams, J. L. 2009. Flowering life-history strategies differ between the native and introduced, ranges of a monocarpic perennial. American Naturalist 174:660-672.
45. Williamson, M. H. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
46. Wolfe, L. M. 2002. Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. American Naturalist 160: 705-711.