Highly connected neurons spike less frequently in balanced networks

Physical Review E

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Pyle, Ryan ^a   Rosenbaum, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEAN FIELD THEORY; NEURAL NETWORKS;

CONNECTIVITY STRUCTURES; CORTICAL NETWORK; EXCITATORY SYNAPTIC INPUTS; FIRING RATES; HETEROGENEOUS ARCHITECTURES; IN-DEGREE; NEURONAL NETWORKS; PARSIMONIOUS MODELING;

NEURONS;

EID: 84964642980     PISSN: 24700045     EISSN: 24700053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.040302     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. W. R. Softky and C. Koch, J. Neurosci. 13, 1 (1993).
2. M. N. Shadlen and W. T. Newsome, Curr. Op. Neurobiol. 4, 569 (1994). COPUEN 0959-4388 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0
3. A. A. Faisal, L. P. Selen, and D. M. Wolpert, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 292 (2008). 1471-003X 10.1038/nrn2258
4. D. Valenti, G. Augello, and B. Spagnolo, Eur. Phys. J. B. 65, 443 (2008). EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00315-6
5. Y. V. Ushakov, A. A. Dubkov, and B. Spagnolo, Phys. Rev. E 81, 041911 (2010). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.041911
6. Y. V. Ushakov, A. A. Dubkov, and B. Spagnolo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 108103 (2011). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.108103
7. W. Gerstner, W. M. Kistler, R. Naud, and L. Paninski, Neuronal Dynamics: From Single Neurons to Networks and Models of Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
8. Y. Shu, A. Hasenstaub, and D. A. McCormick, Nature (London) 423, 288 (2003). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature01616
9. M. Wehr and A. M. Zador, Nature (London) 426, 442 (2003). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature02116
10. J. Mariño, J. Schummers, D. C. Lyon, L. Schwabe, O. Beck, P. Wiesing, K. Obermayer, and M. Sur, Nat Neurosci. 8, 194 (2005). NANEFN 1097-6256 10.1038/nn1391
11. B. Haider, A. Duque, A. R. Hasenstaub, and D. A. McCormick, J. Neurosci. 26, 4535 (2006). JNRSDS 0270-6474 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5297-05.2006
12. M. Okun and I. Lampl, Nat. Neurosci. 11, 535 (2008). NANEFN 1097-6256 10.1038/nn.2105
13. A. L. Dorrn, K. Yuan, A. J. Barker, C. E. Schreiner, and R. C. Froemke, Nature (London) 465, 932 (2010). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09119
14. Y. J. Sun, G. K. Wu, B.-h. Liu, P. Li, M. Zhou, Z. Xiao, H. W. Tao, and L. I. Zhang, Nature (London) 465, 927 (2010). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09079
15. M. Zhou, F. Liang, X. R. Xiong, L. Li, H. Li, Z. Xiao, H. W. Tao, and L. I. Zhang, Nat. Neurosci. 17, 841 (2014). NANEFN 1097-6256 10.1038/nn.3701
16. P. C. Petersen, M. Vestergaard, K. H. R. Jensen, and R. W. Berg, J. Neurosci. 34, 2774 (2014). JNRSDS 0270-6474 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3349-13.2014
17. C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Science 274, 1724 (1996). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.274.5293.1724
18. C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Neural. Comput. 10, 1321 (1998). NEUCEB 0899-7667 10.1162/089976698300017214
19. A. Renart, N. Brunel, and X.-J. Wang, in Computational Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Approach (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2004), pp. 431-490.
20. M. Monteforte and F. Wolf, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041007 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevX.2.041007
21. G. Lajoie, K. K. Lin, and E. Shea-Brown, Phys. Rev. E 87, 052901 (2013). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052901
22. S. Lim and M. S. Goldman, Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1306 (2013). NANEFN 1097-6256 10.1038/nn.3492
23. R. Rosenbaum and B. Doiron, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021039 (2014). 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021039
24. S. Song, P. J. Sjöström, M. Reigl, S. Nelson, and D. B. Chklovskii, PLoS Biol. 3, e68 (2005). 1545-7885 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068
25. A. J. Sadovsky and J. N. MacLean, J. Neurosci. 33, 14048 (2013). JNRSDS 0270-6474 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1977-13.2013
26. S. S. Gururangan, A. J. Sadovsky, and J. N. MacLean, PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003710 (2014). 1553-7358 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003710
27. I. Landau, R. Egger, M. Oberlaender, and H. Sompolinsky, The relationship between microcircuit structure and dynamics in the rat barrel cortex, Program No. 535.02, Neuroscience Meeting Planner (Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC, 2014).
28. I. D. Landau, R. Egger, V. J. Dercksen, M. Oberlaender, and H. Sompolinsky, Slow adaptation facilitates excitation-inhibition balance in the presence of structural heterogeneity (Cosyne Abstracts 2016, Salt Lake City, USA).
29. I. D. Landau and H. Sompolinsky, Realistic structural heterogeneity in local circuits and its implications on the balanced state (Cosyne Abstracts 2015, Salt Lake City, USA).
30. M. Vegué and A. Roxin, Different models of network connectivity can explain non-random features of cortical microcircuits, Program No. 94.11, Neuroscience Meeting Planner (Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC, 2015).
31. M. Okun, N. A. Steinmetz, L. Cossell, M. F. Iacaruso, H. Ko, P. Barthó, T. Moore, S. B. Hofer, T. D. Mrsic-Flogel, M. Carandini, and K. D. Harris, Nature (London) 521, 511 (2015). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature14273
32. P. Dayan and L. F. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
33. G. B. Ermentrout and D. H. Terman, Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2010).
34. D. Amit and N. Brunel, Cereb. Cortex 7, 237 (1997). 1460-2199 10.1093/cercor/7.3.237
35. E. Ledoux and N. Brunel, Front Comput. Neurosci. 5, 25 (2011). 1662-5188 10.3389/fncom.2011.00025
36. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.040302 for generalizations and extensions of results.
37. F. G. Tricomi, Integral Equations (Interscience, New York, 1957).
38. L. Zhao, I. Bryce Beverlin, T. Netoff, and D. Q. Nykamp, Front. Comp. Neurosci. 5, 1 (2011).
39. J. M. Beggs and D. Plenz, J. Neurosci. 23, 11167 (2003).