Preconceptual creativity

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 252-259

  Takala, Tapio ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE MECHANISMS; DYNAMIC BEHAVIORS; NEW SOLUTIONS; SOFT CONSTRAINT; SYMBOLIC REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84964612209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Boden, M. (1990). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Weidenfeld & Nicholson (2nd ed. Routledge, 2004).
2. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial intelligence, 47(1), 139-159.
3. Brooks, R., & Stein, L. (1994). Building brains for bodies. Autonomous Robots, 1(1), 7-25.
4. Chella, A., Gaglio, S., Oliveri, G., Augello, A., & Pilato, G. (2014). Creativity in Conceptual Spaces. In 5th Intl. Conf. on Computational Creativity, 306-314.
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
6. Duka, A. V. (2014). Neural network based inverse kinematics solution for trajectory tracking of a robotic arm. Procedia Technology, 12, 20-27.
7. Egner, T., Monti, J. & Summerfield, C. (2010). Expectation and Surprise Determine Neural Population Responses in the Ventral Visual Stream. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(49), 16601–16608.
8. Gabora, L. (2010). Revenge of the 'neurds': Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of human memory. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1-13.
9. Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. MIT press.
10. Goldstone, R. L., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2010). Categorical perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(1), 69-78.
11. Grace, K., & Maher, M. L. (2014). What to expect when you’re expecting: the role of unexpectedness in computationally evaluating creativity. In 4th Intl. Conf. on Computational Creativity, 120-128.
12. Hofstadter, D., & Mitchell, M. (1994). The copycat project: A model of mental fluidity and analogy-making. Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, 2(31-112), 29-30.
13. Hristovski, R., Davids, K., Araujo, D., & Passos, P. (2011). Constraints-induced emergence of functional novelty in complex neurobiological systems: a basis for creativity in sport. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 15(2), 175-206.
14. Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design studies, 12(1), 3-11.
15. Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological bulletin, 70(6p1), 387-403.
16. Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-organizing maps (Vol. 30). Springer Science & Business Media.
17. Kohonen, T., Kaski, S., Lagus, K., Salojarvi, J., Honkela, J., Paatero, V., & Saarela, A. (2000). Self organization of a massive document collection. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 11(3), 574-585.
18. Lorini, E., & Falcone, R. (2005). Modeling expectations in cognitive agents. In AAAI 2005 Fall Symposium: From Reactive to Anticipatory Cognitive Embodied Systems. 114-121.
19. Maher, M. L., Brady, K., & Fisher, D. (2013). Computational models of surprise in evaluating creative design. In 4th Intl. Conf. on Computational Creativity, 147-151.
20. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120.
21. Newell, A., Shaw, C., & Simon, H. A. (1959). The processes of creative thinking. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
22. Pylyshyn, Z. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition 80(1), 127-158.
23. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 4(3), 328-350.
24. Rosch, E., Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT press.
25. Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press.
26. Takala, T. (2005). Creativity as disruptive adaptation – a computational case study. In: Gero and Maher (eds.), Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design VI, Univ. of Sydney, 95-110.
27. Wiley, D. J., & Hahn, J. K. (1997). Interpolation synthesis of articulated figure motion. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 17(6), 39-45.