Modeling expectations in cognitive agents

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-05-05, Issue , 2005, Pages 114-120

  Lorini, Emiliano ^a   Falcone, Rino ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ANTICIPATORY REPRESENTATIONS; MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33645979665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bandura, A. (1990). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, pp. 122-147.
2. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y. (2001). Modal Logic. Cambridge University press.
3. Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
4. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (1998). Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'98), pp. 72-79, Paris, France.
5. Castelfranchi, C., Lorini, E. (2003). Cognitive Anatomy and Functions of Expectations. In Proceedings of IJCAI '03 Workshop on Cognitive modeling of agents and multi-agent interaction, Acapulco, Mexico.
6. Cohen, P. R., Levesque, H. J. (1990). Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42, pp. 213-261.
7. Cooper, J., Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkovitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 17, pp. 229-266, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Darwiche, A., Pearl, J. (1997). On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence, 89(1,2), pp. 1-29.
9. Dasgupta, P. (1990). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta Ed.), Trust, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
10. De Kleer, J. (1986) An assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence, 28 (2), pp. 127-162.
11. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1997). Focusing vs. Belief Revision: A Fundamental Distinction When Dealing with Generic Knowledge. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Practical Reasoning, pp. 96-107.
12. Emerson, E. A. (1990). Temporal and Modal Logic. In J. van Leeuwen (Ed.), Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B: Formal Models and Sematics, North-Holland Pub. Co./MIT Press.
13. Fagin, R., Halpern, J. Y. (1987). Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 34, pp. 39-76.
14. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C. (2001). Social Trust: A Cognitive Approach. In Castelfranchi, C., Yao-Hua, Tan (Eds.), Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Halpern, J. Y. (2003). Reasoning about uncertainty. The MIT Press.
16. Herzig, A., Longin, D. (2002). Sensing and revision in a modal logic of belief and action. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 307-311, The Netherlands: IOL Press.
17. Lorini, E. (2005). The atoms of action: a formal model of Intention and Attempt. Master thesis, Université Paul Sabatier and Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, 2005.
18. Macedo, L., Cardoso, A. (2001). Modeling Artificial Forms of Surprise in an Artificial Agent. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, UK.
19. Marsh, S. (1994). Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Stirling.
20. Meyer, J.-J. Ch., van der Hoek, W., van Linder, B. (1999). A Logical Approach to the Dynamics of Commitments. Artificial Intelligence, 113(1-2), pp. 1-40.
21. Meyer, W.-U., Reisenzein, R., Schützwohl, A. (1997). Towards a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, pp. 251-274.
22. Miceli, M., Castelfranchi. The Mind and the Future. The (Negative) Power of Expectations. Theory & Psychology, 12(3), pp. 335-366, 2002.
23. Ortony, A., Partridge (1987). Surprisingness and expectation failure: What's the difference? In Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 106-108.
24. Rao, A. S., Georgeff, M. P. (1991). Asymmetry thesis and side-effect problems in linear time and branching time intention logics. In C. Rich, W. Swartout, B. Nebel (Eds.), In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
25. Rao, A. S., Georgeff, M. P. (1992). An abstract architecture for rational agents, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, C. Rich, W. Swartout, and B. Nebel (Eds.), pp. 439-449, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1992.
26. Raub, W., Weesie J. (1990). Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: an Example of Network Effects. American Journal of Sociology 96, pp. 626-654.
27. Shanahan, M. (2002). A logical account of perception incorporating feedback and expectation. In Proceedings of 8th international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, Toulouse, France, pp. 3-13.
28. Snijders, C., Keren, G. (1996). Determinants of Trust. In Proceedings of the workshop in honor of Amnon Rapoport, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA, 6-7 August.