Positive and negative forms of replicability in gene network analysis

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1065-1073

  Verleyen, W ^a   Ballouz, S ^a   Gillis, J ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84964562361     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv734     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altschul,S. F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
2. Anastassiadis,T. et al. (2011) Comprehensive assay of kinase catalytic activity reveals features of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 1039-1045.
3. Ashburner,M. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet., 25, 25-29.
4. Ballouz,S. et al. (2015) Guidance for RNA-seq co-expression network construction and analysis: safety in numbers. Bioinformatics, 31, 2123-2130.
5. Begley,C. G. and Ellis,L. M. (2012) Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483, 531-533.
6. Behrends,C. et al. (2010) Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature, 466, 68-76.
7. Bickel,P. J. et al., (1975) Sex bias in graduate admissions: data from Berkeley. Science, 187, 398-404.
8. Bornigen,D. et al. (2012) An unbiased evaluation of gene prioritization tools. Bioinformatics, 28, 3081-3088.
9. Breiman,L. (1996) Bagging predictors. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 24, 123-140.
10. Brown,K. V. and Jurisica,I. (2007) Unequal evolutionary conservation of human protein interactions in interologous networks. Genome Biol., 8, R95.
11. Chatr-aryamontri,A. et al. (2013) The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D816-D823.
12. Demsar, J. (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7, 1-30.
13. Dietterich,T. G. (1998) Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput., 10, 1895-1923.
14. Finn,R. D. et al. (2014) Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D222-D230.
15. Fisher,R. A. (1935) The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyde, Edinburgh, London.
16. Geschwind,D. H. (2008) Autism: many genes, common pathways? Cell, 135, 391-395.
17. Gillis,J. and Pavlidis,P. (2011) The impact of multifunctional genes on guilt by association analysis. PLoS One, 6, e17258.
18. Gillis,J. and Pavlidis,P. (2013) Assessing identity, redundancy and confounds in Gene Ontology annotations over time. Bioinformatics, 29, 476-482.
19. Goodhart,C. A. E. (1975) Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience. Reserve Bank of Australia, Papers in Monetary Economics.
20. Greene,C. S. andTroyanskaya,O. G. (2012) Accurate evaluation and analysis of functional genomics data andmethods. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1260, 95-100.
21. Gulsuner,S. et al. (2013) Spatial and temporal mapping of de novo mutations in schizophrenia to a fetal prefrontal cortical network. Cell, 154, 518-529.
22. Hall, M. A. (2000) Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. In: Langley,P. (ed), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 359-366.
23. Hunter,S. et al. (2012) InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D306-D312.
24. Ioannidis,J. P. (2005) Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA, 294, 218-228.
25. Joshi-Tope,G. et al. (2005) Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D428-D432.
26. Kryshtafovych,A. et al. (2014) CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins, 82 (suppl. ), 164-174.
27. Marbach,D. et al. (2012) Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference. Nat. Methods, 9, 796-804.
28. Maslov,S. and Sneppen,K. (2002) Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science, 296, 910-913.
29. Mellacheruvu,D. et al. (2013) The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods, 10, 730-736.
30. Mellers,B. et al. (2014) Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psychol. Sci., 25, 1106-1115.
31. Mistry,M. and Pavlidis,P. (2008) Gene Ontology term overlap as a measure of gene functional similarity. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 327.
32. Moreau,Y. and Tranchevent,L. C. (2012) Computational tools for prioritizing candidate genes: boosting disease gene discovery. Nat. Rev. Genet., 13, 523-536.
33. O'Roak,B. J. et al. (2012) Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature, 485, 246-250.
34. Oellrich,A. et al. (2012) Improving disease gene prioritization by comparing the semantic similarity of phenotypes in mice with those of human diseases. PLoS One, 7, e38937.
35. Ogata,H. et al. (1999) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 29-34.
36. Oliver,S. (2000) Guilt-by-association goes global. Nature, 403, 601-603.
37. Orchard,S. et al. (2014) The MIntAct project-IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D358-D363.
38. Parikshak,N. N. et al. (2013) Integrative functional genomic analyses implicate specific molecular pathways and circuits in autism. Cell, 155, 1008-1021.
39. Pavlidis,P. and Gillis,J. (2013) Progress and challenges in the computational prediction of gene function using networks: 2012-2013 update. F1000Res., 2, 230.
40. Pedregosa,F. et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825-2830.
41. Pena-Castillo,L. et al. (2008) A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence. Genome Biol., 9 (suppl. ), S2.
42. Pornpitakpan,C. (2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades' evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 34, 243-281.
43. Portales-Casamar,E. et al. (2013) Neurocarta: aggregating and sharing disease-gene relations for the neurosciences. BMC Genomics, 14, 129.
44. Radivojac,P. et al. (2013) A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat. Methods, 10, 221-227.
45. Schaefer,M. H. et al. (2012) HIPPIE: integrating protein interaction networks with experiment based quality scores. PLoS One, 7, e31826.
46. Scheufele,D. A. (2014) Science communication as political communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111 (suppl. ), 13585-13592.
47. Stark,C. et al. (2006) BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D535-D539.
48. Verleyen,W. et al. (2015) Measuring the wisdom of the crowds in networkbased gene function inference. Bioinformatics, 31, 745-752.
49. Wang,P. I. and Marcotte,E. M. (2010) It's the machine that matters: predicting gene function and phenotype from protein networks. J. Proteomics, 73, 2277-2289.
50. White,J. A. et al. (1997) Guidelines for human gene nomenclature (1997). HUGO Nomenclature Committee. Genomics, 45, 468-471.
51. Zuberi,K. et al. (2013) GeneMANIA prediction server 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, W115-W122.