Consumer perceptions of interactions with primary care providers after direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 164, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 513-522

  Van Der Wouden, Cathelijne H ^a   Carere, Deanna Alexis ^b,f   Maitland Van Der Zee, Anke H ^a   Ruffin, MacK T ^c,d   Roberts, J Scott ^d,g   Green, Robert C ^e   Krier, Joel B ^h   Helm, Margaret H ^h   Lehmann, Lisa S ^h   Kraft, Peter ^f   Le, Lan Q ^g   Ostergren, Jenny ^g   Uhlmann, Wendy R ^g   Couper, Mick P ^g   Mountain, Joanna L ⁱ   Kiefer, Amy K ⁱ   Braunstein, Glenn D ^j   Crawford, Scott D ^k   Cupples, L Adrienne ^l   Chen, Clara A ^l   Wang, Catharine ^l   Gray, Stacy W ^m   Koenig, Barbara A ⁿ   Kaphingst, Kimberly ^o   Gollust, Sarah ^p   more..

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b David Braley Cardiac Vascular and Stroke Research Institute   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^h HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

ⁱ University of Michigan School of Public Health ^*  (United States)

^j Pathway Genomics   (United States)

^k Survey Sciences Group SoundRocket   (United States)

^l BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^m DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSUMER; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CONSUMER PERCEPTION; DIRECT TO CONSUMER PERSONAL GENOMIC TESTING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHARMACOGENOMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; GENOMICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SCREENING TEST; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER SCREENING AND TESTING; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; GENOMICS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84964547509     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/M15-0995     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Evans JP, Green RC. Direct to consumer genetic testing: avoiding a culture war. Genet Med. 2009; 11:568-9. [PMID: 19606051] doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181afbaed
2. Frueh FW, Greely HT, Green RC, Hogarth S, Siegel S. The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12: 511-5. [PMID: 21629275] doi:10.1038/nrg3026
3. Green RC, Farahany NA. Regulation: the FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics. Nature. 2014; 505:286-7. [PMID: 24436984]
4. Janssens AC, Gwinn M, Bradley LA, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM, Khoury MJ. A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82:593-9. [PMID: 18319070] doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.020
5. Offit K. Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? JAMA. 2008; 299:1353-5. [PMID: 18349097] doi:10.1001/jama.299 .11.1353
6. Janssens AC, van Duijn CM. An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Investig Genet. 2010; 1:10. [PMID: 21092344] doi:10.1186/2041-2223-1-10
7. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle-will we get our wish? N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:105-7. [PMID: 18184955] doi:10.1056/NEJMp0708162
8. Samuel GN, Jordens CF, Kerridge I. Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA. Intern Med J. 2010; 40:220-4. [PMID: 20446967] doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02190.x
9. McGuire AL, Burke W. An unwelcome side effect of direct-toconsumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. JAMA.2008; 300:2669-71. [PMID: 19066388] doi:10.1001/jama.2008 .803
10. Darst BF, Madlensky L, Schork NJ, Topol EJ, Bloss CS. Characteristics of genomic test consumers who spontaneously share results with their health care provider. Health Commun. 2014; 29:105-8. [PMID: 23384116] doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.717216
11. Kaufman DJ, Bollinger JM, Dvoskin RL, Scott JA. Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2012; 21:413-22. [PMID: 22278220] doi:10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0
12. McGuire AL, Diaz CM, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9:3-10. [PMID: 19998099] doi:10.1080/1526 5160902928209
13. Bernhardt BA, Zayac C, Gordon ES, Wawak L, Pyeritz RE, Gollust SE. Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians. Per Med. 2012; 9:683-692. [PMID: 23795206]
14. Powell KP, Cogswell WA, Christianson CA, Dave G, Verma A, Eubanks S, et al. Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2012; 21:113-26. [PMID: 21769569] doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9390-9
15. Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O'Connor A, Skirton H. Direct-toconsumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature. J Community Genet. 2013; 4:169-80. [PMID: 23322235] doi:10.1007/s12687-012-0135-8
16. 23andMe. Accessed at www.23andme.com on November 2014.
17. Pathway Genomics. Accessed at www.pathway.com on November 2014.
18. Lehmann LS, Kaufman DJ, Sharp RR, Moreno TA, Mountain JL, Roberts JS, et al. Navigating a research partnership between academia and industry to assess the impact of personalized genetic testing. GenetMed.2012; 14:268-73. [PMID: 22241103] doi:10.1038/gim .2011.59
19. Carere DA, Couper MP, Crawford SD, Kalia SS, Duggan JR, Moreno TA, et al; PGen Study Group. Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers. Genome Med. 2014; 6:96. [PMID: 25484922] doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0096-0
20. PatientsLikeMe. Accessed at www.patientslikeme.com on September 1 2015.
21. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51:903-12. [PMID: 9817107]
22. Ebell MH. Diagnosis of anxiety disorders in primary care. Am Fam Physician. 2008; 78:501-2. [PMID: 18756659]
23. Ostergren JE, Gornick MC, Carere DA, Kalia SS, Uhlmann WR, Ruffin MT, et al; PGen Study Group. How well do customers of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing services comprehend genetic test results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study. Public Health Genomics. 2015; 18:216-24. [PMID: 26087778] doi:10.1159/000431250
24. Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C, Griffin G, Christman MF, Pyeritz RE, et al. Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15:22-30. [PMID: 21654153] doi:10.1159/000327296
25. Pinkhasov RM, Wong J, Kashanian J, Lee M, Samadi DB, Pinkhasov MM, et al. Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on health care utilization and health risk behavior in men and women in the United States. Int J Clin Pract. 2010; 64:475-87. [PMID: 20456194] doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02290.x
26. Carere DA, Kraft P, Kaphingst KA, Roberts JS, Green RC. Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Genet Med. 2016; 18:65-72. [PMID: 25812042] doi:10.1038/gim.2015.34
27. Baars MJ, Henneman L, Ten Kate LP. Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genet Med. 2005; 7:605-10. [PMID: 16301861]
28. Bottorff JL, Blaine S, Carroll JC, Esplen MJ, Evans J, Nicolson Klimek ML, et al. The educational needs and professional roles of Canadian physicians and nurses regarding genetic testing and adult onset hereditary disease. Community Genet. 2005; 8:80-7. [PMID: 15925883]
29. Houwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Jan Dinant G, Cornel MC. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Fam Pract. 2011; 12:5. [PMID: 21329524] doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-5
30. Powell KP, Christianson CA, Cogswell WA, Dave G, Verma A, Eubanks S, et al. Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2012; 21:469-78. [PMID: 22207397] doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9471-9
31. Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998; 47:213-20. [PMID: 9752374]
32. Burke W, Emery J. Genetics education for primary-care providers. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3:561-6. [PMID: 12094234]
33. Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD. Educating healthcare professionals about genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2007; 8:151-7. [PMID: 17230201]
34. Feero WG. Genetics of common disease: a primary care priority aligned with a teachable moment? Genet Med. 2008; 10:81-2. [PMID: 18281913] doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181639a6d
35. Feero WG, Green ED. Genomics education for health care professionals in the 21st century. JAMA. 2011; 306:989-90. [PMID: 21900139] doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1245
36. Frueh FW, Gurwitz D. From pharmacogenetics to personalized medicine: a vital need for educating health professionals and the community. Pharmacogenomics. 2004; 5:571-9. [PMID: 15212593]
37. Nelson EA, McGuire AL. The need for medical education reform: genomics and the changing nature of health information [Editorial]. Genome Med. 2010; 2:18. [PMID: 20236478] doi:10.1186/gm139
38. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002; 15:25-38. [PMID: 11841136]
39. Boguski MS, Boguski RM, Berman MR. Personal genotypes are teachable moments. Genome Med. 2013; 5:22. [PMID: 23514125] doi:10.1186/gm426
40. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 52:609-20. [PMID: 11206657]
41. Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Krupat E, Azari R. Unmet expectations for care and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17:817-24. [PMID: 12406352]
42. Rosenberg L. Does direct-to-consumer marketing of medical technologies undermine the physician-patient relationship? Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9:22-3. [PMID: 19326306] doi:10.1080/152651 60802716852