Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: Ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA

Internal Medicine Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 220-224

  Samuel, G N ^a,b   Jordens, C F C ^a   Kerridge, I ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer; Ethics; Genetic predisposition testing; Genetics population; Regulation

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL FEATURE; DIRECT TO CONSUMER PERSONAL GENOME TESTING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY DNA SEQUENCE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DNA; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC TESTING; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 77949643459     PISSN: 14440903     EISSN: 14455994     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02190.x     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Genetic Health Personal Health Management [Homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.genetic-health.co.uk/dna- test-services/obesity-test.htm
2. Eastern Biotech and Life Sciences [Homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.easternbiotech.com/test-centers.php
3. CBC News. Personal DNA Testing Comes to Canada. [updated 2008 Jan 23; cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2008/01/ 23/dna-sale.html
4. Sui S, Sleeboom-Faulkner M. Commercial genetic testing in mainland China: social, financial and ethical issues. J Bioeth Inq 2007 4 : 229 237.
5. deCODEme [Homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.decodeme.com/complete-genetic-scan
6. National Cancer Institute [Homepage on the Internet]. National Cancer Institute Fact Sheet. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/brca
7. Health Insite: An Australian Government Initiative [Homepage on the Internet]. Huntington's Disease. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.healthinsite.gov.au/topics/Huntington-s-Disease
8. Fleming N. Rival genetic tests leave buyers confused. The Sunday Times. 7 September 2008.
9. Human Genetics Commission. Ensuring the Effective Oversight of Genetic Tests Supplied Directly to the Public. London, UK : Department of Health 2003. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4009678
10. Janssens AC, Gwinn M, Bradley LA, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM, Khoury MJ. A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. Am J Hum Genet 2008 82 : 593 599.
11. Katsanis SH, Javitt G, Hudson K. Public health. A case study of personalized medicine. Science 2008 320 : 53 4.
12. Offit K. Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? JAMA 2008 299 : 1353 1355.
13. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle-will we get our wish? N Engl J Med 2008 358 : 105 107.
14. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. Statement by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies on advertising genetic tests via the Internet. 2003. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/03/273&format= HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
15. Hudson K, Javitt G, Burke W, Byers P. ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2007 110 : 1392 1395.
16. American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. ACMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Genet Med 2006 6 : 60.
17. Wasson K, Cook ED, Helzlsouer K. Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues. Ethics Med 2006 22 : 83 91.
18. Kennedy. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2008. 110th United States Congress. Bill number H.R. 493.
19. McGuire AL, Diaz CM, Hilsenbeck SG, Wang T. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth 2009 9 : 3 11.
20. McGuire AL, Burke W. An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. JAMA 2008 300 : 2669 2671.
21. Australian Law Reform Commission and the Australian Health Ethics Committee of the NHMRC. Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia - Part C: Australian Law Reform Commission. 2003. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/ alrc/publications/reports/96
22. Australian Government Response. 2005. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.alrc.gov.au/inquiries/title/alrc96/response.htm
23. Therapeutic Goods Administration. The Regulation of Nutrigenetic Tests in Australia. 2007. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.tga.gov. au/devices/ivd-nutrigenetic.htm
24. Australian Law Reform Commission and the Australian Health Ethics Committee of the NHMRC. Direct-to-consumer Genetic Testing - Public Meeting Summary. 2008. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/ media/events/genetic-testing-summary.htm
25. Federal Trade Commission. At-Home Genetic Tests: A Healthy Dose of Skepticism May Be the Best Prescription. 2007. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/health/hea02.shtm
26. Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act S. 976. 110th Congress ed 2007.
27. Laboratory Test Improvement Act. S.736. 110th Congress ed 2007.
28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing. 2006. [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.eurogentest.org/aboutus/db/news/117/index.xhtml
29. Global Harmonization Task Force. Principles of In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Classification and Principles of Conformity Assessment for In vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices. 2007 [cited 2009 Aug 10]. Available from URL: http://www.ghtf.org/sg1/sg1-final.html
30. Prainsack B, Reardon J, Hindmarsh R, Gottweis H, Naue U, Lunshof JE. Personal genomes: misdirected precaution. Nature 2008 456 : 34 5.
31. In need of counseling? Nat Biotechnol 2008 26 : 716.
32. Jordens C, Kerridge I, Samuel G. Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: The problem isn't ignorance; it's market failure. Am J Bioeth 2009 9 : 13 15.
33. Hogarth S, Javitt G, Melzer D. The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008 9 : 161 182.