Topologically associating domains: An invariant framework or a dynamic scaffold?

Nucleus

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 430-434

  Cubeñas Potts, Caelin ^a   Corces, Victor G ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D architecture; Architectural proteins; Chromatin; CTCF; Differentiation; Epigenetics; Heat shock; Insulators; TAD

Indexed keywords

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; GENE DISRUPTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; ENHANCER REGION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENOME; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PROMOTER REGION; TEMPERATURE;

CCCTC-BINDING FACTOR; CHROMATIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENOME; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84964510311     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2015.1096467     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, Servant N, Piolot T, van Berkum NL, Meisig J, Sedat J, et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 2012; 485:381-5; PMID:22495304; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11049
2. Hou C, Li L, Qin ZS, Corces VG. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol Cell 2012; 48:471-84; PMID:23041285; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.031
3. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, Hu M, Liu JS, Ren B. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012; 485:376-80; PMID:22495300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11082
4. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, Hoichman M, Parrinello H, Tanay A, Cavalli G. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 2012; 148:458-72; PMID:22265598; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010
5. Phillips-Cremins JE, Sauria ME, Sanyal A, Gerasimova TI, Lajoie BR, Bell JS, Ong CT, Hookway TA, Guo C, Sun Y, et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 2013; 153:1281-95; PMID:23706625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053
6. Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, Sanborn AL, Machol I, Omer AD, Lander ES, et al. A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping. Cell 2014; 159:1665-80; PMID:25497547; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
7. Li L, Lyu X, Hou C, Takenaka N, Nguyen HQ, Ong CT, Cubenas-Potts C, Hu M, Lei EP, Bosco G, et al. Widespread rearrangement of 3D chromatin organization underlies polycomb-mediated stress-induced silencing. Mol Cell 2015; 58:216-31; PMID:25818644; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.023
8. LeDily F, Bau D, Pohl A, Vicent GP, Serra F, Soronellas D, Castellano G, Wright RH, Ballare C, Filion G, et al. Distinct structural transitions of chromatin topological domains correlate with coordinated hormone-induced gene regulation. Genes Dev 2014; 28:2151-62; PMID:25274727; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.241422.114
9. Giorgetti L, Galupa R, Nora EP, Piolot T, Lam F, Dekker J, Tiana G, Heard E. Predictive polymermodeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell 2014; 157:950-63; PMID:24813616; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.025
10. Van Bortle K, Nichols MH, Li L, Ong CT, Takenaka N, Qin ZS, Corces VG. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy. Genome Biol 2014; 15:R82; PMID:24981874; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-5-r82
11. Vietri Rudan M, Barrington C, Henderson S, Ernst C, Odom DT, Tanay A, Hadjur S. Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture. Cell Rep 2015; 10:1297-309; PMID:25732821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. celrep.2015.02.004
12. Gomez-Marin C, Tena JJ, Acemel RD, Lopez-Mayorga M, Naranjo S, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Maeso I, Beccari L, Aneas I, Vielmas E, et al. Evolutionary comparison reveals that diverging CTCF sites are signatures of ancestral topological associating domains borders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:7542-7; PMID:26034287; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505463112
13. Pope BD, Ryba T, Dileep V, Yue F, Wu W, Denas O, Vera DL, Wang Y, Hansen RS, Canfield TK, et al. Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature 2014; 515:402-5; PMID:25409831; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13986
14. Sofueva S, Yaffe E, Chan WC, Georgopoulou D, Vietri Rudan M, Mira-Bontenbal H, Pollard SM, Schroth GP, Tanay A, Hadjur S. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J 2013; 32:3119-29; PMID:24185899; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.237
15. Arner E, Daub CO, Vitting-Seerup K, Andersson R, Lilje B, Drablos F, Lennartsson A, Ronnerblad M, Hrydziuszko O, Vitezic M, et al. Gene regulation. Transcribed enhancers lead waves of coordinated transcription in transitioning mammalian cells. Science 2015; 347:1010-4; PMID:25678556; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259418
16. Lupianez DG, Kraft K, Heinrich V, Krawitz P, Brancati F, Klopocki E, Horn D, Kayserili H, Opitz JM, Laxova R, et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 2015; 161:1012-25; PMID:25959774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004
17. Guo Y, Xu Q, Canzio D, Shou J, Li J, Gorkin David U, Jung I, Wu H, Zhai Y, Tang Y, et al. CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function. Cell; 162:900-10; PMID:26276636; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038
18. Wang H, Maurano MT, Qu H, Varley KE, Gertz J, Pauli F, Lee K, Canfield T, Weaver M, Sandstrom R, et al. Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation. Genome Res 2012; 22:1680-8; PMID:22955980; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.136101.111
19. Engel N, West AG, Felsenfeld G, Bartolomei MS. Antagonism between DNA hypermethylation and enhancer-blocking activity at the H19 DMD is uncovered by CpG mutations. Nat Genetics 2004; 36:883-8; PMID:15273688; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1399
20. Dixon JR, Jung I, Selvaraj S, Shen Y, Antosiewicz-Bourget JE, Lee AY, Ye Z, Kim A, Rajagopal N, Xie W, et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stemcell differentiation. Nature 2015; 518:331-6; PMID:25693564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14222
21. Williamson I, Berlivet S, Eskeland R, Boyle S, Illingworth RS, Paquette D, Dostie J, Bickmore WA. Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Dev 2014; 28:2778-91; PMID:25512564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.251694.114
22. Seitan VC, Faure AJ, Zhan Y, McCord RP, Lajoie BR, Ing-Simmons E, Lenhard B, Giorgetti L, Heard E, Fisher AG, et al. Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments. Genome Res 2013; 23:2066-77; PMID:24002784; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.161620.113
23. Zuin J, Dixon JR, van der Reijden MI, Ye Z, Kolovos P, Brouwer RW, van de Corput MP, van de Werken HJ, Knoch TA, van IWF, et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:996-1001
24. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. Comprehensive mapping of longrange interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009; 326:289-93; PMID:19815776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1181369