Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 215, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 243.e1-243.e7

  Feghali, Maisa N ^a   Caritis, Steve N ^a   Catov, Janet M ^a   Scifres, Christina M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

gestational diabetes; induction of labor; timing of delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BISHOP SCORING; BODY MASS; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; NEONATAL HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; PARITY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; TERM BIRTH;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TERM BIRTH;

EID: 84964330465     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1 Crowther, C.A., Hiller, J.E., Moss, J.R., et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 352 (2005), 2477–2486.
2. 2 Spong, C.Y., Mercer, B.M., D'Alton, M., Kilpatrick, S., Blackwell, S., Saade, G., Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 118 (2011), 323–333.
3. 3 Martin, J.A., Hamilton, B.E., Ventura, S.J., et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 60 (2011), 1–70.
4. 4 Vahratian, A., Zhang, J., Troendle, J.F., Sciscione, A.C., Hoffman, M.K., Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 105 (2005), 698–704.
5. 5 Luthy, D.A., Malmgren, J.A., Zingheim, R.W., Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004), 1511–1515.
6. 6 Darney, B.G., Snowden, J.M., Cheng, Y.W., et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 122 (2013), 761–769.
7. 7 Caughey, A.B., Nicholson, J.M., Cheng, Y.W., Lyell, D.J., Washington, A.E., Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 (2006), 700–705.
8. 8 Koopmans, C.M., Bijlenga, D., Groen, H., et al. Induction of labor versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Lancet 374 (2009), 979–988.
9. 9 Boulvain, M., Senat, M.V., Perrotin, F., et al. Induction of labor versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 385 (2015), 2600–2605.
10. 10 Bailit, J.L., Grobman, W., Zhao, Y., et al. Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212 (2015), 103.e1–103.e7.
11. 11 Bishop, E.H., Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24 (1964), 266–268.
12. 12 Laughon, S.K., Zhang, J., Troendle, J., Sun, L., Reddy, U.M., Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 117 (2011), 805–811.
13. 13 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Practice bulletin no. 137. Obstet Gynecol 122 (2013), 406–416.
14. 14 Conway, D.L., Langer, O., Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 (1998), 922–925.
15. 15 Lurie, S., Insler, V., Hagay, Z.J., Induction of labor at 38 to 39 weeks of gestation reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia in gestational diabetic patients class A2. Am J Perinatol 13 (1996), 293–296.
16. 16 Lurie, S., Matzkel, A., Weissman, A., Gotlibe, Z., Friedman, A., Outcome of pregnancy in class A1 and A2 gestational diabetic patients delivered beyond 40 weeks' gestation. Am J Perinatol 9 (1992), 484–488.
17. 17 Peled, Y., Perri, T., Chen, R., Pardo, J., Bar, J., Hod, M., Gestational diabetes mellitus–implications of different treatment protocols. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 17 (2004), 847–852.
18. 18 Kjos, S.L., Henry, O.A., Montoro, M., Buchanan, T.A., Mestman, J.H., Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 (1993), 611–615.
19. 19 Sutton, A.L., Mele, L., Landon, M.B., et al. Delivery timing and cesarean delivery risk in women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211 (2014), 244.e1–244.e7.
20. 20 Carpenter, M.W., Coustan, D.R., Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144 (1982), 768–773.
21. 21 Alexander, G.R., Himes, J.H., Kaufman, R.B., Mor, J., Kogan, M., A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 87 (1996), 163–168.
22. 22 Glantz, J.C., Elective induction vs spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 50 (2005), 235–240.
23. 23 Seyb, S.T., Berka, R.J., Socol, M.L., Dooley, S.L., Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 94 (1999), 600–607.
24. 24 Glantz, J.C., Term labor induction compared with expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 115 (2010), 70–76.
25. 25 Caughey, A.B., Sundaram, V., Kaimal, A.J., et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 151 (2009), 252–263 W53-63.
26. 26 Gulmezoglu, A.M., Crowther, C.A., Middleton, P., Heatley, E., Induction of labor for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, 2012, CD004945.
27. 27 Smith, G.C., Celik, E., To, M., Khouri, O., Nicolaides, K.H., Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 358 (2008), 1346–1353.
28. 28 Tajik, P., van der Tuuk, K., Koopmans, C.M., et al. Should cervical favorability play a role in the decision for labor induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial. BJOG 119 (2012), 1123–1130.
29. 29 Niu, B., Lee, V.R., Cheng, Y.W., Frias, A.E., Nicholson, J.M., Caughey, A.B., What is the optimal gestational age for women with gestational diabetes type A1 to deliver?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211 (2014), 418.e1–418.e6.
30. 30 Hibbard, J.U., Wilkins, I., Sun, L., et al. Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births. JAMA 304 (2010), 419–425.