Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 119, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1123-1130

  Tajik, P ^a   Van Der Tuuk, K ^b   Koopmans, C M ^b   Groen, H ^b   Van Pampus, M G ^b   Van Der Berg, P P ^b   Van Der Post, J A ^a   Van Loon, A J ^c   De Groot, C J M ^d   Kwee, A ^e   Huisjes, A J M ^f   Van Beek, E ^g   Papatsonis, D N M ^h   Bloemenkamp, K W ⁱ   Van Unnik, G A ^j   Porath, M ^k   Rijnders, R J ^l   Stigter, R H ^m   De Boer, K ⁿ   Scheepers, H C ^o   Zwinderman, A H ^a   Bossuyt, P M ^a   Mol, B W ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c MARTINI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f GELRE HOSPITALS   (Netherlands)

^g ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^h AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁱ LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^j Diaconessen Hospital   (Netherlands)

^k MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^l JEROEN BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^m DEVENTER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁿ RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^o RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Bishop score; Cervical length; Expectant management; Gestational hypertension; Induction of labour; Pre eclampsia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HELLP SYNDROME; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NETHERLANDS; OBSTETRICS; PLACENTA DISORDER; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADULT; CERVICAL RIPENING; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION, PREGNANCY-INDUCED; LABOR, INDUCED; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK;

EID: 84863719437     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03405.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Sibai B,. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 181-92. (Pubitemid 36792143)
2. Gofton EN, Capewell V, Natale R, Gratton RJ,. Obstetrical intervention rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with gestational hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 798-803. (Pubitemid 32980514)
3. Sibai BM,. Management of late preterm and early-term pregnancies complicated by mild gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2011; 35: 292-6.
4. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S1-22.
5. Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, Vijgen SM, Aarnoudse JG, Bekedam DJ, et al., Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 979-88.
6. NICE. Hypertension in Pregnancy: The Management of Hypertensive Disorders During Pregnancy the Management of Hypertensive Disorders. London: NICE, 2011.
7. Bishop EH,. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 266-8.
8. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM,. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 805-11.
9. Follmann D,. Subgroups and interactions. In:, Gellers NL, editor. Advances in Clinical Trial Biostatistics. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2004. pp. 121-41.
10. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK,. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 698-704. (Pubitemid 40432184)
11. Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW,. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1511-5. (Pubitemid 39491173)
12. Vrouenraets FPJM, Roumen FJME, Dehing CJG, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ,. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 690-7. (Pubitemid 40432183)
13. Calkins LA, Irvine JH, Horsley GW,. Variation in the length of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1930; 19: 294-7.
14. Bewley S, Shennan A,. HYPITAT and the fallacy of pregnancy interruption. Lancet 2010; 375: 119; author reply 119-20.