Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 600-607

  Seyb, Stacy T ^a   Berka, Ronald J ^a   Socol, Michael L ^a   Dooley, Sharon L ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MODEL; NULLIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; PARITY; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0032860537     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00377-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rates of cesarean delivery - United States, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 44:1995;303-307.
2. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of final natality statistics, 1996. Monthly vital statistics report, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics 1998;46(supp):11.
3. Mathews T.J. Trends in stimulation and induction of labor 1989-1995. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 78:1997;20-26.
4. Smith L.P., Nagourney B.A., McLean F.H., Usher R.H. Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 148:1984;579-585.
5. Martin D.H., Thompson W., Pinkerton J.H.M., Watson J.D. A randomized controlled trial of selected planned delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 85:1978;109-113.
6. Cole R.A., Howie P.W., Macnaughton M.C. Elective induction of labor A randomized prospective trial . Lancet. i:1975;767-770.
7. Sande H.A., Tuveng J., Fonstelien T. A prospective randomized study of induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 21:1983;333-336.
8. Macer J.A., Macer C.L., Chan L.S. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor A retrospective study of complications and outcome . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 166:1992;1690-1697.
9. Yudkin P., Fumar A.M., Anderson A.B. A retrospective study of induction of labor. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 86:1979;257-265.
10. Lampe L.G. Elective induction of labour in the obstetrical practice. Acta Chir Hung. 27:1986;143-149.
11. Prysak M., Castronova F.C. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor A case-control analysis of safety and efficacy . Obstet Gynecol. 92:1998;47-52.
12. Lopez-Zeno J.A., Peaceman A.M., Adashek J.A., Socol M.L. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Engl J Med. 326:1992;450-454.
13. Lin A., Kupferminc M., Dooley S.L. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus laminaria for cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 86:1995;545-549.
14. Davis L.A., Dube R.J. Alternative costing methods in health care. Hosp Cost Account Advis. 3:1988;1-8.
15. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 57:1981;537-545.
16. Mastrogiannis D.S., Knuppel R.A. Labor induced using methods that do not involve oxytocin. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 38:1995;259-266.
17. Crane S.S., Wojtowycz M.A., Dye T.D., Aubry R.H., Artal R. Association between prepregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 89:1997;213-216.
18. Brost B.C., Goldenberg R.L., Mercer B.M., Iams J.D., Meis P.J., Moawad A.H., et al. The preterm prediction study Association of cesarean delivery with increases in maternal weight and body mass index . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 177:1997;333-341.
19. Garbaciak J.A., Richter M., Miller S., Barton J.J. Maternal weight and pregnancy complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 152:1985;238-245.
20. Witter F.R., Caulfield L.E., Stoltzfus R.J. Influence of maternal anthropometric status and birth weight on the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 85:1995;947-951.
21. Turner M.J., Rasmussen M.J., Turner J.E., Boylan P.C., MacDonald D., Stronge J.M. The influence of birth weight on labor in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 76:1990;159-163.
22. Satin A.J., Maberry M.C., Leveno K.J., Sherman M.L., Kline D.M. Chorioamnionitis A harbinger of dystocia . Obstet Gynecol. 79:1992;913-915.
23. Lieberman E., Lang J.M., Cohen A., D'Agnostino R., Sanjay D., Frigoletto F.D. Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 88:1996;993-1000.
24. Thorp J.A., Eckert L.O., Ang M.S., Johnston D.A., Peaceman A.M., Parisi V.M. Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia Risk factors in nulliparas . Am J Perinatol. 8:1991;402-410.
25. Thorp J.A., Parisi V.M., Boylan P.C., Johnston D.A. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 161:1989;670-675.
26. Thorp J.A., Hu D.H., Albin R.M., McNitt J., Meyer B.A., Cohen G.R., et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor A randomized, controlled, prospective trial . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 169:1993;851-858.
27. Ramin S.M., Gambling D.R., Lucas M.J., Sharma S.K., Sidawi J.E., Leveno K.J. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 86:1995;783-789.
28. Philipsen T., Jensen N.H. Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labor A randomized study concerning progress in labor and instrumental deliveries . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 30:1989;27-33.