Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: Reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Duracinsky, Martin ^a,b   Lalanne, Christophe ^a,c   Goujard, Cécile ^b,d   Herrmann, Susan ^e   Cheung Lung, Christian ^b   Brosseau, Jean Paul ^b,f   Schwartz, Yannick ^g,h   Chassany, Olivier ^a,i  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^e MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f Service ACT du Val de Marne   (France)

^g INRIA SACLAY   (France)

^h SERVICE HOSPITALIER FRÉDÉRIC JOLIOT   (France)

ⁱ SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Electronic records; HIV; Patient reported outcomes; Quality of life; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ELECTRONIC RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAPER; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION STUDY;

ELECTRONIC RECORDS; HIV; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTERS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAPER; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84901440863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3330     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Reiser SJ. The clinical record in medicine. Part 1: Learning from cases. Ann Intern Med 1991 May 15;114(10):902-907. [Medline: 2014953]
2. Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Gorden SM. Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999 Jun;6(3):245-251 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10332657]
3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration; 2009. URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf [accessed 2014-02-12] [WebCite Cache ID 6NKQY89wp]
4. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 2002 May 18;324(7347):1193-1194 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12016186]
5. Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res 2011 Oct;2(4):137-144 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.86879] [Medline: 22145124]
6. Bernhard J, Cella DF, Coates AS, Fallowfield L, Ganz PA, Moinpour CM, et al. Missing quality of life data in cancer clinical trials: serious problems and challenges. Stat Med 1998;17(5-7):517-532. [Medline: 9549801]
7. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 2008 Apr;11(2):322-333. [doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x] [Medline: 18380645]
8. McKenzie S, Paty J, Grogan D, Rosano M, Curry L, Sciarappa K, et al. Applied Clinical Trials. 2004. Proving the eDiary dividend URL: http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/appliedclinicaltrials/article/ articleDetail.jsp?id=98374 [accessed 2014-02-12] [WebCite Cache ID 6NKSDLr46]
9. Ganser AL, Raymond SA, Pearson JD. In: Byrom B, Tiplady B, editors. Epro: Electronic Solutions for Patient-Reported Data. Oxford: Gower Pub Co; 2010.
10. Juniper EF, Langlands JM, Juniper BA. Patients may respond differently to paper and electronic versions of the same questionnaires. Respir Med 2009 Jun;103(6):932-934. [doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.019] [Medline: 19028085]
11. Miller CW, Himelhoch S. Acceptability of Mobile Phone Technology for Medication Adherence Interventions among HIV-Positive Patients at an Urban Clinic. AIDS Res Treat 2013;2013:670525 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1155/2013/670525] [Medline: 23997948]
12. Swendeman D, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Innovation in sexually transmitted disease and HIV prevention: internet and mobile phone delivery vehicles for global diffusion. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2010 Mar;23(2):139-144 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328336656a] [Medline: 20087189]
13. Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, ISPOR ePRO Task Force. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 2009 Jun;12(4):419-429. [doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x] [Medline: 19900250]
14. Duracinsky M, Herrmann S, Berzins B, Armstrong AR, Kohli R, Le Coeur S, et al. The development of PROQOL-HIV: an international instrument to assess the health-related quality of life of persons living with HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012 Apr 15;59(5):498-505. [doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318245cafe] [Medline: 22205438]
15. Duracinsky M, Lalanne C, Le Coeur S, Herrmann S, Berzins B, Armstrong AR, et al. Psychometric validation of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire, a new health-related quality of life instrument-specific to HIV disease. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012 Apr 15;59(5):506-515. [doi: 10.1097/QAI. 0b013e31824be3f2] [Medline: 22293550]
16. Streiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
17. Dray-Spira R, Wilson d'Almeida K, Aubriere C. Living With HIV: First Results of ANRS-VESPA2 Study. 2013. Health status of people living with HIV followed at hospital in metropolitan France in 2011 and characteristics of those recently diagnosed URL: http://www.invs.sante.fr/beh/2013/27/201326-271.html [accessed 2014-02-12] [WebCite Cache ID 6NKQKpdtz]