In a randomized controlled trial, patients preferred electronic data collection of breast cancer risk-factor information in a mammography setting

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 77-81

  Aiello, Erin J ^a   Taplin, Stephen ^b   Reid, Robert ^a,c   Hobbs, Maria ^d   Seger, Deborah ^a   Kamel, Hakim ^e   Tufano, Jim ^f   Ballard Barbash, Rachel ^b  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e WrinkleBrain Inc   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Data quality; Health informatics; Patient acceptance; Screening mammography; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MICROCOMPUTERS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 29144456095     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. G.C. Harewood, R.F. Yacavone, G.R. Locke 3rd, and M.J. Wiersema Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone Am J Gastroenterol 96 2001 3312 3317
2. A.S. Wilson, G.D. Kitas, D.M. Carruthers, C. Reay, J. Skan, S. Harris, G.J. Treharne, S.P. Young, and P.A. Bacon Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36 Rheumatology (Oxford) 41 2002 268 273
3. A. McTiernan, M.A. Gilligan, and C. Redmond Assessing individual risk for breast cancer: risky business J Clin Epidemiol 50 1997 547 556
4. S.H. Taplin, R.S. Thompson, F. Schnitzer, C. Anderman, and V. Immanuel Revisions in the risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative Cancer 66 1990 812 818 [Erratum in: Cancer 1991;67:2400]
5. A.P. Carter, R.S. Thompson, R.V. Bourdeau, J. Andenes, H. Mustin, and H. Straley A clinically effective breast cancer screening program can be cost-effective, too Prev Med 16 1987 19 34
6. S.H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa, D.S. Buist, D. Seger, and E. White Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 2004 225 234
7. D.J. Wilkie, M.K. Judge, D.L. Berry, J. Dell, S. Zong, and R. Gilespie Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain J Pain Symptom Manage 25 2003 213 224
8. C.L. Berthelsen, and K.R. Stilley Automated personal health inventory for dentistry: a pilot study J Am Dent Assoc 131 2000 59 66
9. G. Velikova, E.P. Wright, A.B. Smith, A. Cull, A. Gould, D. Forman, T. Perren, M. Stead, J. Brown, and P.J. Selby Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires J Clin Oncol 17 1999 998 1007
10. B. Fortner, T. Okon, L. Schwartzberg, K. Tauer, and A.C. Houts The Cancer Care Monitor: psychometric content evaluation and pilot testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients J Pain Symptom Manage 26 2003 1077 1092
11. P.P. Le, I.S. Kohane, and J.C. Weeks Using a pen-based computer to collect health-related quality of life and utilities information Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995 839 843
12. B.D. Bliven, S.E. Kaufman, and J.A. Spertus Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference Qual Life Res 10 2001 15 22
13. S.W. McRoy, A. Liu-Perez, and S.S. Ali Interactive computerized health care education J Am Med Inform Assoc 5 1998 347 356
14. J. Buxton, M. White, and D. Osoba Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life Qual Life Res 7 1998 513 519
15. J. Kim, D. Trace, K. Meyers, and M. Evens An empirical study of the Health Status Questionnaire System for use in patient-computer interaction Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997 86 90
16. R. Theiler, J. Spielberger, H.A. Bischoff, N. Bellamy, J. Huber, and S. Kroesen Clinical evaluation of the WOMAC 3.0 OA Index in numeric rating scale format using a computerized touch screen version Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10 2002 479 481
17. P.A. Taenzer, M. Speca, M.J. Atkinson, B.D. Bultz, S. Page, P. Harasym, and J.L. Davis Computerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic Cancer Pract 5 1997 168 175
18. L. Kleinman, N.K. Leidy, J. Crawley, A. Bonomi, and P. Schoenfeld A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire Med Care 39 2001 181 189
19. A. Boyes, S. Newell, and A. Girgis Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: are computers the way forward in a clinical setting? Qual Life Res 11 2002 27 35
20. J.H. Lofland, M. Schaffer, and N. Goldfarb Evaluating health-related quality of life: cost comparison of computerized touch-screen technology and traditional paper systems Pharmacotherapy 20 2000 1390 1395