Patient characteristics predicting failure to receive indicated care for type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 247-258

  Mounce, L T A ^a   Steel, N ^b   Hardcastle, A C ^b   Henley, W E ^a   Bachmann, M O ^b   Campbell, J L ^a   Clark, A ^b   Melzer, D ^a   Richards, S H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Patient education; Prediction; Quality of care

Indexed keywords

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; FEMALE; FOOT CARE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH LITERACY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROTEINURIA; SELF CARE; SINGLE (MARITAL STATUS); TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 84964301189     PISSN: 01688227     EISSN: 18728227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hu F.B. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care 2011, 34(6):1249-1257.
2. Swinburn B.A., Sacks G., Hall K.D., McPherson K., Finegood D.T., Moodie M.L., et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 2011, 378(9793):804-814.
3. American Diabetes Association Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2002, 25(Suppl. 1):s28-s32.
4. Holman R.R., Paul S.K., Bethel M.A., Matthews D.R., Neil H.A.W. 10-Year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008, 359(15):1577-1589.
5. Pyörälä K., Pedersen T.R., Kjekshus J., Faergeman O., Olsson A.G., Thorgeirsson G., et al. Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease: a subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Diabetes Care 1997, 20(4):614-620.
6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998, 317(7160):703-713.
7. National Institute for Clinical Excellence The management of type 2 diabetes 2009, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London.
8. Kringos D., Boerma W., Bourgueil Y., Cartier T., Dedeu T., Hasvold T., et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract 2013, 63(November (616)):e742-e750.
9. NHS Confederation BMA The new general medical services contract 2003, The NHS Confederation, London.
10. Pierce M.B., Zaninotto P., Steel N., Mindell J. Undiagnosed diabetes - data from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Diabet Med 2009, 26(7):679-685.
11. The NHS Information Centre The National Diabetes Audit 2009-10 2011, NHS Information Centre, Leeds.
12. de Wet C., McKay J., Bowie P. Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12(1):351.
13. Kontopantelis E., Reeves D., Valderas J.M., Campbell S., Doran T. Recorded quality of primary care for patients with diabetes in England before and after the introduction of a financial incentive scheme: a longitudinal observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 2013, 22(January (1)):53-64.
14. Steel N., Bachmann M., Maisey S., Shekelle P., Breeze E., Marmot M., et al. Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England. BMJ 2008, 337:a957.
15. Wenger N.S., Solomon D.H., Roth C.P., MacLean C.H., Saliba D., Kamberg C.J., et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139(9):740-747.
16. Kiran T., Victor J.C., Kopp A., Shah B.R., Glazier R.H. The relationship between financial incentives and quality of diabetes care in Ontario, Canada. Diabetes Care 2012, 35(5):1038-1046.
17. National Institute for Clinical Excellence Diabetes in adults quality standard 2011, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London.
18. Nolan T., Berwick D. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA 2006, 295:10.
19. Shekelle P., Vijan S. Quality indicators for the care of diabetes mellitus in vulnerable elders. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007, 55(Suppl. 2):S312-S317.
20. Shekelle P.G., MacLean C.H., Morton S.C., Wenger N.S. Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135(8 (Pt. 2)):647-652.
21. Steel N., Melzer D., Shekelle P.G., Wenger N.S., Forsyth D., McWilliams B.C. Developing quality indicators for older adults: transfer from the USA to the UK is feasible. Qual Saf Health Care 2004, 13(4):260-264.
22. Taylor R., Conway L., Calderwood L., Lessof C., Cheshire H., Cox K., et al. Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England: The 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Technical Report 2007, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.
23. Scholes S., Medina J., Cheshire H., Cox K., Hacker E., Lessof C. Living in the 21st century: older people in England: The 2006 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Technical Report 2009, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.
24. Cheshire H., Hussey D., Medina J., Pickering K., Wood N., Ward K., et al. Financial circumstances, health and well-being of the older population in England: The 2008 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Technical Report 2012, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.
25. Wenger N.S., Shekelle P.G. Assessing care of vulnerable elders: ACOVE project overview. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135(8 (Pt. 2)):642-646.
26. Mant J., Hicks N. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction. BMJ 1995, 311(7008):793-796.
27. Brook R.H., Chassin M.R., Fink A., Solomon D.H., Kosecoff J., Park R.E. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986, 2(1):53-63.
28. Kirk S.A., Campbell S.M., Kennell-Webb S., Reeves D., Roland M.O., Marshall M.N. Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems. Qual Saf Health Care 2003, 12(December (6)):421-427.
29. Llewellyn D.J., Lang I.A., Langa K.M., Naughton F., Matthews F.E. Exposure to secondhand smoke and cognitive impairment in non-smokers: national cross sectional study with cotinine measurement. BMJ 2009, 338.
30. Radloff L.S. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 1(June (3)):385-401.
31. Banks J., Nazroo J., Steptoe A. The dynamics of ageing: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2002-10 (Wave 5) 2012, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.
32. Hyde M., Wiggins R.D., Higgs P., Blane D.B. A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment Health 2003, 7(3):186-194.
33. Doran T., Fullwood C., Kontopantelis E., Reeves D. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework. Lancet 2008, 372(9640):728-736.
34. Khunti K., Gadsby R., Millett C., Majeed A., Davies M. Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality-of-care reports with results of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for diabetes. Diabet Med 2007, 24(12):1436-1441.
35. Oluwatowoju I., Abu E., Wild S., Byrne C. Improvements in glycaemic control and cholesterol concentrations associated with the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a regional 2-year audit of diabetes care in the UK. Diabet Med 2010, 27(3):354-359.
36. Kennedy A., Bower P., Reeves D., Blakeman T., Bowen R., Chew-Graham C., et al. Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013, 346.
37. Rogers A., Kennedy A., Bower P., Gardner C., Gately C., Lee V., et al. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust 2008, 189(10):S21-S24.
38. Chang J., MacLean C., Roth C., Wenger N. A comparison of the quality of medical care measured by interview and medical record. J Gen Intern Med 2004, 19(Suppl. 1):s109-s110.
39. Tisnado D.M., Adams J.L., Liu H., Damberg C.L., Chen W-P., Hu F.A., et al. What is the concordance between the medical record and patient self-report as data sources for ambulatory care?. Med Care 2006, 44(2):132-140.
40. Gillam S.J., Siriwardena A.N., Steel N. Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2012, 10(September-October (5)):461-468.