Corrigendum: Automated structure modeling of large protein assemblies using crosslinks as distance restraints (Nature Methods (2016) 13 (515-520) DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3838);Automated structure modeling of large protein assemblies using crosslinks as distance restraints

Nature Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 515-520

  Ferber, Mathias ^a   Kosinski, Jan ^b   Ori, Alessandro ^b,c   Rashid, Umar J ^b   Moreno Morcillo, Maria ^b,d   Simon, Bernd ^b   Bouvier, Guillaume ^a   Batista, Paulo Ricardo ^a,e   Muller, Christoph W ^b   Beck, Martin ^b   Nilges, Michael ^a  

^a INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^c FRITZ LIPMANN INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^d Centro Nacional de Investigations Oncológicas   (Spain)

^e INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA POLYMERASE II; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; DNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE III; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CROSS LINKING; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENZYME SUBUNIT; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMISTRY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RNA POLYMERASE III; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84964225177     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth0318-226b     Document Type: Erratum

References (46)

1. Merkley, E.D., Cort, J.R., Adkins, J.N. Crosslinking and mass spectrometry methodologies to facilitate structural biology: finding a path through the maze. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 14, 77-90 (2013).
2. Rappsilber, J. The beginning of a beautiful friendship: crosslinking/mass spectrometry and modelling of proteins and multi-protein complexes. J. Struct. Biol. 173, 530-540 (2011).
3. Wu, C.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, H.-T. The TFIIF-like Rpc37/53 dimer lies at the center of a protein network to connect TFIIIC, Bdp1, and the RNA polymerase III active center. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 2715-2728 (2011).
4. Wu, C.-C. et al. RNA polymerase III subunit architecture and implications for open promoter complex formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19232-19237 (2012).
5. Forné, I., Ludwigsen, J., Imhof, A., Becker, P.B., Mueller-Planitz, F. Probing the conformation of the ISWI ATPase domain with genetically encoded photoreactive crosslinkers and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111-012088 (2012).
6. Politis, A. et al. A mass spectrometry-based hybrid method for structural modeling of protein complexes. Nat. Methods 11, 403-406 (2014).
7. Lasker, K. et al. Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1380-1387 (2012).
8. Erzberger, J.P. et al. Molecular architecture of the 40S•eIF1•eIF3 translation initiation complex. Cell 158, 1123-1135 (2014).
9. Street, T.O. et al. Elucidating the mechanism of substrate recognition by the bacterial Hsp90 molecular chaperone. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 2393-2404 (2014).
10. de Vries, S.J. et al. HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets. Proteins 69, 726-733 (2007).
11. Kahraman, A. et al. Crosslink guided molecular modeling with ROSETTA. PLoS ONE 8, e73411 (2013).
12. Kalisman, N., Adams, C.M., Levitt, M. Subunit order of eukaryotic TRiC/CCT chaperonin by crosslinking, mass spectrometry, and combinatorial homology modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2884-2889 (2012).
13. Chen, Z.A. et al. Architecture of the RNA polymerase II-TFIIF complex revealed by crosslinking and mass spectrometry. EMBO J. 29, 717-726 (2010).
14. Robinson, P.J. et al. Molecular architecture of the yeast Mediator complex. Elife 4, e08719 (2015).
15. Rieping, W., Habeck, M., Nilges, M. Inferential structure determination. Science 309, 303-306 (2005).
16. Nilges, M. et al. Accurate NMR structures through minimization of an extended hybrid energy. Structure 16, 1305-1312 (2008).
17. Habeck, M., Rieping, W., Nilges, M. Weighting of experimental evidence in macromolecular structure determination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1756-1761 (2006).
18. Bouvier, G., Desdouits, N., Ferber, M., Blondel, A., Nilges, M. An automatic tool to analyze and cluster macromolecular conformations based on self-organizing maps. Bioinformatics 31, 1490-1492 (2015).
19. Armache, K.-J., Mitterweger, S., Meinhart, A., Cramer, P. Structures of complete RNA polymerase II and its subcomplex, Rpb4/7. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7131-7134 (2005).
20. Méndez, R., Leplae, R., De Maria, L., Wodak, S.J. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 52, 51-67 (2003).
21. Hoffmann, N.A. et al. Molecular structures of unbound and transcribing RNA polymerase III. Nature 528, 231-236 (2015).
22. Fernández-Tornero, C. et al. Conformational flexibility of RNA polymerase III during transcriptional elongation. EMBO J. 29, 3762-3772 (2010).
23. Vannini, A. et al. Molecular basis of RNA polymerase III transcription repression by Maf1. Cell 143, 59-70 (2010).
24. Fernández-Tornero, C. et al. Crystal structure of the 14-subunit RNA polymerase I. Nature 502, 644-649 (2013).
25. Engel, C., Sainsbury, S., Cheung, A.C., Kostrewa, D., Cramer, P. RNA polymerase I structure and transcription regulation. Nature 502, 650-655 (2013).
26. Lefèvre, S. et al. Structure-function analysis of hRPC62 provides insights into RNA polymerase III transcription initiation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 352-358 (2011).
27. Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: fully automated protein structure prediction in CASP8. Proteins 77 (suppl. 9), 100-113 (2009).
28. Merkley, E.D. et al. Distance restraints from crosslinking mass spectrometry: mining a molecular dynamics simulation database to evaluate lysine-lysine distances. Protein Sci. 23, 747-759 (2014).
29. Ferri, M.L. et al. A novel subunit of yeast RNA polymerase III interacts with the TFIIB-related domain of TFIIIB70. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 488-495 (2000).
30. He, Y., Fang, J., Taatjes, D.J., Nogales, E. Structural visualization of key steps in human transcription initiation. Nature 495, 481-486 (2013).
31. Thuillier, V., Stettler, S., Sentenac, A., Thuriaux, P., Werner, M. A mutation in the C31 subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase III affects transcription initiation. EMBO J. 14, 351-359 (1995).
32. Kosinski, J. et al. Xlink Analyzer: software for analysis and visualization of crosslinking data in the context of three-dimensional structures. J. Struct. Biol. 189, 177-183 (2015).
33. Moreno-Morcillo, M. et al. Solving the RNA polymerase I structural puzzle. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 70, 2570-2582 (2014).
34. Leitner, A. et al. Expanding the chemical crosslinking toolbox by the use of multiple proteases and enrichment by size exclusion chromatography. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11, M111-014126 (2012).
35. Kettenberger, H., Armache, K.-J., Cramer, P. Complete RNA polymerase II elongation complex structure and its interactions with NTP and TFIIS. Mol. Cell 16, 955-965 (2004).
36. Xu, H., Freitas, M.A. MassMatrix: a database search program for rapid characterization of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 9, 1548-1555 (2009).
37. Rinner, O. et al. Identification of crosslinked peptides from large sequence databases. Nat. Methods 5, 315-318 (2008).
38. Walzthoeni, T. et al. False discovery rate estimation for crosslinked peptides identified by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 9, 901-903 (2012).
39. Kosinski, J., Barbato, A., Tramontano, A. MODexplorer: an integrated tool for exploring protein sequence, structure and function relationships. Bioinformatics 29, 953-954 (2013).
40. Söding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21, 951-960 (2005).
41. Eswar, N. et al. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 51, 291-2931 (2007).
42. Nilges, M., Malliavin, T., Bardiaux, B. in Solid-State NMR Studies of Biopolymers (eds. McDermott, A.E., Polenova, T.) Ch. 22 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2010).
43. Nilmeier, J.P., Crooks, G.E., Minh, D.D.L., Chodera, J.D. Nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo is an efficient tool for equilibrium simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E1009-E1018 (2011).
44. Brünger, A.T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921 (1998).
45. Joosten, R.P. et al. A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D411-D419 (2011).
46. Marks, D.S. et al. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS ONE 6, e28766 (2011)