Update on mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 225-229

  Rubertsson, Sten ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; mechanical chest compressions; outcome

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

BRAIN OXYGEN TENSION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DEFIBRILLATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART ARREST; HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSOR; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; SURVIVAL; THERAPY DELAY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; DEVICES; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; HEART MASSAGE; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84964077449     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000302     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Aickin R, et al. 2015 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2015; (Suppl 1):132
2. Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:840-848
3. Stiell IG, Brown SP, Christenson J, et al. What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation? Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1192-1198
4. Wik L. Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2000; 471:7-25
5. Perkins GD, Brace S, Gates S. Mechanical chest compression devices: current and future roles. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16:201-210
6. Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, et al. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-ofhospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006; 295:2620-2628
7. Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, et al. Manual vs integrated automatic loaddistributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation 2014; 85:741-748
8. Gates S, Quinn T, Deakin CD, et al. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: systemic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2015; 94:91-97
9. Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, et al. Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus CPR including a mechanical chest compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a comprehensive meta-analysis from randomized and observational studies. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 67:349.e3-360.e3
10. Olsen J-A, Lerner EB, Persse D, et al. Chest compression duration influences outcome between integrated load-distributing band and manual CPR during cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60:222-229
11. Steinberg MT, Olsen J-A, Brunborg C, et al. Defibrillation success during different phases of the mechanical chest compression cycle. Resuscitation 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
12. Ogawa Y, Shiozaki T, Hirose T, et al. Load-distributing-band cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increases regional cerebral oxygenation: a single-center prospective pilot study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2015; 23:99-105
13. Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, Rubertsson S. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCASTM device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2011; 82:702-706
14. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The LINC randomized trial. JAMA 2014; 311:53-61
15. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, et al. Per-protocol and pre-defined population analysis of the LINC study. Resuscitation 2015; 96:92-99
16. Esibov A, Banville I, Chapman FW, et al. Mechanical chest compressions improved aspects of CPR in the LINC trial. Resuscitation 2015; 91: 116-121
17. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385:947-955
18. Zeiner S, Sulzgruber P, Datler P, et al. Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial. Resuscitation 2015; 96:220-225
19. Lameijer H, Immink RS, Broekema JJ, Ter Maaten JC. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Eur J Emerg Med 2015; 22:379-383
20. Pinto DC, Haden-Pinneri K, Love JC. Manual and automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of associated injury patterns. J Forensic Sci 2013; 58:904-909
21. Koga Y, Fujita M, Yagi T, et al. Effects of mechanical chest compression device with a load-distributing band on postresuscitation injuries identified by postmortem computed tomography. Resuscitation 2015; 96:226-231
22. Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, Rubertsson S. No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS devicea pilot study. Resuscitation 2009; 80:1104-1107
23. Smekal D, Hansen T, Sandler H, Rubertsson S. Comparison of computed tomography and autopsy in detection of injuries after unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2013; 84:357-360
24. Smekal D, Lindgren E, Sandler H, et al. CPR related injuries after manual or mechanical chest compressions with the LUCASTM device: a multicenter study of victims after unsuccessful resuscitation. Resuscitation 2014; 85:1708-1712.