Per-Protocol and Pre-Defined population analysis of the LINC study

Resuscitation

Volumn 96, Issue , 2015, Pages 92-99

  Rubertsson, Sten ^a   Lindgren, Erik ^a   Smekal, David ^a   Östlund, Ollie ^a   Silfverstolpe, Johan ^b   Lichtveld, Robert A ^c   Boomars, Rene ^c   Bruins, Wendy ^c   Ahlstedt, Björn ^d   Skoog, Gunnar ^e   Kastberg, Robert ^e   Halliwell, David ^f   Box, Martyn ^f   Herlitz, Johan ^g   Karlsten, Rolf ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c Regional Ambulance Services   (Netherlands)

^d CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e GÄVLE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^f South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust Abbey Court ^*  (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cardiac arrest; Defibrillation; LUCAS CPR; Mechanical chest compression; Out of hospital cardiac arrest; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARDIAC RESUSCITATOR; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEFIBRILLATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDUCED HYPOTHERMIA; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANUAL CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; MECHANICAL CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESUSCITATION; RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; AMBULANCE; CARDIOVERSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART MASSAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULANCES; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ELECTRIC COUNTERSHOCK; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84944899107     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rubertsson S., Grenvik A., Zemgulis V., Wiklund L. Systemic perfusion pressure and blood flow before and after administration of epinephrine during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:1984-1996.
2. Weil M.H., Bisera J., Trevino R.P., Rackow E.C. Cardiac output and end-tidal carbon dioxide. Crit Care Med 1985, 13:907-909.
3. Steen S., Liao Q., Pierre L., Paskevicius A., Sjöberg T. The critical importance of minimal delay between chest compressions and subsequent defibrillation: a haemodynamic explanation. Resuscitation 2003, 58:249-258.
4. Sato Y., Weil M.H., Sun S., et al. Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1997, 25:733-736.
5. Paradis N.A., Martin G.B., Rivers E.P., et al. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 1990, 263:1106-1113.
6. Eftestøl T., Sunde K., Steen P.A. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2002, 105:2270-2273.
7. Nolan J.P., Deakin C.D., Soar J., Bottiger B.W., Smith G. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005, 67:39-86.
8. Rubertsson S., Silfverstolpe J., Rehn L., et al. The Study Protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest) Study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013, 21:5. Available at: http://www.sjtrem.com/content/21/1/5.
9. Rubertsson S., Lindgren E., Smekal D., et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA 2014, 311:53-61.
10. Jennet B., Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975, 305:480-484.
11. Steen S., Liao Q., Pierre L., Paskevicius A., Sjöberg T. Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 2002, 55:285-299.
12. Forti A., Zilio G., Zanatta P., et al. Full recovery after prolonged cardiac arrest and resuscitation with mechanical chest compression device during helicopter transportation and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Emerg Med 2014, 47:632-634.
13. Zimmerman S., Rohde D., Marwan M., Ludwig J., Achenbach S. Complete recovery after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with prolonged (59min) mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mild therapeutic hypothermia and complex percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 2014, 43:62-65.
14. Wik L., Kiil S. Use of an automatic mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS) as a bridge to establishing cardiopulmonary bypass for a patient with hypothermic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005, 66:391-394.
15. Wagner H., Terkelsen C.J., Friberg H., et al. Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: a 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. Resuscitation 2010, 81:383-387.