Mechanical chest compressions improved aspects of CPR in the LINC trial

Resuscitation

Volumn 91, Issue , 2015, Pages 116-121

  Esibov, Alexander ^a   Banville, Isabelle ^a   Chapman, Fred W ^a   Boomars, René ^b   Box, Martyn ^c   Rubertsson, Sten ^d  

^a Physio Control Inc ^*  (United States)

^b Regional Ambulance Facilities Utrecht   (Netherlands)

^c Abbey Ct ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Chest compression fraction; Defibrillation; Mechanical CPR; Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); Perishock pause

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFIBRILLATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSOR; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESUSCITATION; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIOVERSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; HEART MASSAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PROCEDURES; THORAX;

AGED; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ELECTRIC COUNTERSHOCK; FEMALE; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; THORAX;

EID: 84929281865     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lloyd-Jones D., Adams R.J., Brown T.M., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2010 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010, 121:e46-e215.
2. Berg R.A., Hemphill R., Abella B.S., et al. Part 5: Adult basic life support. 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010, 122:S685-S705.
3. Nolan J.P., Soar J., Zideman D.A., et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1219-1276.
4. McDonald C.H., Heggie J., Jones C.M., Thorne C.J., Hulme J. Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance. J Emerg Med 2013, 30:623-627.
5. Sugerman N.T., Edelson D.P., Leary M., et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation 2009, 80:981-984.
6. Krarup N.H., Terkelsen C.J., Johnsen S.P. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is hampered by interruptions in chest compressions-a nationwide prospective feasibility study. Resuscitation 2011, 82:263-269.
7. Fox J., Fiechter R., Gerstl P., et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions. Acute Card Care 2013, 15:1-6.
8. ®) over hands off and good quality chest compression time. Resuscitation 2012, 83:e77-e78.
9. Putzer G., Braun P., Zimmermann A., et al. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study. Am J Emerg Med 2013, 31:384-389.
10. Gässler H., Ventzke M.M., Lampl L., Helm M. Transport with ongoing resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical compression. J Emerg Med 2013, 30:589-592.
11. Wyss C.A., Fox J., Franzech F., et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression during CPR in a cardiac catherisation setting. Cardiovasc Med 2010, 13:92-96.
12. Yost D., Phillips R.D., Gonzales L., et al. Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system. Resuscitation 2012, 83:961-965.
13. Rubertsson S., Silfverstolpe J., Rehn L., et al. The study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013, 21:5.
14. Rubertsson S., Lindgren E., Smekal D., et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The LINC randomized trial. JAMA 2014, 311:53-61.
15. Nolan J.P., Deakin C.D., Soar J., Böttiger B.W., Smith G. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005, 67:S39-S86.
16. Vaillancourt C., Everson-Stewart S., Christenson J., et al. The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2011, 82:1501-1507.
17. Christenson J., Andrusiek D., Everson Stewart S., et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009, 120:1241-1247.
18. Wik L., Olsen J.A., Persse D., et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation 2014, 85:741-748.
19. Perkins G.D., Lall R., Quinn T., et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2014, 14:61886-61889.
20. Smekal D., Johansson J., Huzevka T., Rubertsson S. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2011, 82:702-706.
21. Hallstrom A., Rea T.D., Sayre M.R., et al. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2006, 295:2620-2628.
22. Brouwer T.F., Walker R.G., Chapman F.W., Koster R.W. Duration of longest chest compression interruption predicts poor cardiac arrest independent of chest compression fraction. Circulation 2012, 126:A87.
23. Levy M., Yost D., Walker R.G., Scheunemann E., Mendive S.R. Optimizing the application of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance cpr approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. Circulation 2014, 130:A222.
24. Cheskes S., Schmicker R.H., Verbeek P.R., et al. The impact of peri-shock pause on survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest during the resuscitation outcomes consortium PRIMED trial. Resuscitation 2014, 85:336-342.
25. Cheskes S., Schmicker R.H., Christenson J., et al. Perishock pause: an independent predictor of survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest. Circulation 2011, 124:58-66.
26. Sullivan J.L., Chapman F.W. Will medical examination gloves protect rescuers from defibrillation voltages during hands-on defibrillation?. Resuscitation 2012, 83:1467-1472.
27. Kramer-Johansen J., Edelson D.P., Abella B.S., Becker L.B., Wik L., Steen P.A. Pauses in chest compression and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts. Resuscitation 2007, 73:212-220.
28. Yost D.A., Moorhead A., Whitney J., Whorton A., Walker R.G. Accuracy of manual shocks by paramedics. Circulation 2014, 130:A256.
29. Abella B.S., Alvarado J.P., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:305-310.
30. Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:299-304.
31. Hostler D., Everson-Stewart S., Rea T.D., et al. Effect of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside hospital: prospective, cluster-randomised trial. BMJ 2011, 342:d512.
32. LUCASTM 2 Chest Compression System-Instructions for Use 100901-00 Rev A, Valid from COJ2716© 2014 Jolife AB.