Within-subject pooling of biological samples to reduce exposure misclassification in biomarker-based studies

Epidemiology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 378-388

  Perrier, Flavie ^a,b   Giorgis Allemand, Lise ^a,b   Slama, Rémy ^a,b   Philippat, Claire ^a,b,c,d  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED BIOSCIENCES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; CALIBRATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EXPOSURE VARIABLE; HUMAN; KIDNEY CONCENTRATING CAPACITY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; URINALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECIMEN HANDLING; STATISTICAL BIAS; URINE;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMARKERS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECIMEN HANDLING; URINE;

EID: 84964067915     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000460     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Calafat AM, Ye X, Silva MJ, Kuklenyik Z, Needham LL. Human exposure assessment to environmental chemicals using biomonitoring. Int J Androl. 2006;29:166-171; discussion 181.
2. Schisterman E F, Albert PS. the biomarker revolution. Stat Med. 2012;31:2513-2515.
3. Ye X, Wong LY, Bishop AM, Calafat AM. Variability of urinary concentrations of bisphenol a in spot samples, frst morning voids, and 24-hour collections. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:983-988.
4. Preau Jr JL, Wong LY, Silva MJ, Needham LL, calafat AM. Variability over one week in the urinary concentrations of metabolites of diethyl phthalate and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate among 8 adults: an observational study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1748-1754.
5. Wielgomas B. Variability of urinary excretion of pyrethroid metabolites in seven persons over seven consecutive days: implications for observational studies. Toxicol Lett. 2013;221:15-22.
6. Armstrong BG. effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:651-656.
7. Rappaport SM, Symanski E, Yager J W, Kupper LL. the relationship between environmental monitoring and biological markers in exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(Suppl 3):49-53.
8. Brunekreef B, Noy D, Clausing P. Variability of exposure measurements in environmental epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125:892-898.
9. De Klerk NH, English DR, Armstrong BK. a review of the effects of random measurement error on relative risk estimates in epidemiological studies. Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18:705-712.
10. Bateson TF, Wright JM. regression calibration for classical exposure measurement error in environmental epidemiology studies using multiple local surrogate exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:344-352.
11. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA. (eds). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. 2nd ed. london: chapman & Hall; 1995.
12. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, calafat AM, et al. impact of early-life bi-sphenol a exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics. 2011;128:873-882.
13. Snijder CA, Heederik D, Pierik FH, et al. Fetal growth and prenatal exposure to bisphenol a: the generation r study. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:393-398.
14. Tielemans E, Heederik D, Burdorf A, Loomis D, Habbema DF. intraindividual variability and redundancy of semen parameters. Epidemiology. 1997;8:99-103.
15. Dorfman R. the detection of defective members of large populations. Ann Math Stat. 1943;14:436-440.
16. Malinovsky Y, Albert PS, Schisterman e F. Pooling designs for outcomes under a gaussian random effects model. Biometrics. 2012;68:45-52.
17. Weinberg CR, Umbach DM. Using pooled exposure assessment to improve effciency in case-control studies. Biometrics. 1999;55:718-726.
18. Schisterman EF, Vexler A. to pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22:486-496.
19. Veronesi G, Ferrario MM, Chambless LE. comparing measurement error correction methods for rate-of-change exposure variables in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013;22:583-597.
20. Adibi JJ, Whyatt RM, Williams PL, et al. characterization of phthalate exposure among pregnant women assessed by repeat air and urine samples. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:467-473.
21. Philippat C, Wolff MS, Calafat AM, et al. Prenatal exposure to environmental phenols: concentrations in amniotic fuid and variability in urinary concentrations during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:1225-1231.
22. Philippat C, Botton J, Calafat AM, Ye X, Charles MA, Slama r; eDen Study group. Prenatal exposure to phenols and growth in boys. Epidemiology. 2014;25:625-635.
23. Fuller WA. Measurement Error Model. new York, nY: John Wiley & Sons 1987.
24. Hardin J W, Schmiediche H, Carroll RJ. the regression-calibration method for fitting generalized linear models with additive measurement error. Stata J. 2003;3:361-372.
25. Hardin J W, Schmiediche H, Carroll RJ. the simulation extrapolation method for ftting generalized linear models with additive measurement error. Stata J. 2003;3:373-385.
26. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, calafat AM, et al. Variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol a concentrations during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:131-137.
27. Attfeld KR, Hughes MD, Spengler JD, Lu C. Within-and between-child variation in repeated urinary pesticide metabolite measurements over a 1-year period. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:201-206.
28. Slama R, Vrijheid M. Some challenges of studies aiming to relate the exposome to human health. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72:383-384.
29. Patel CJ, Yang T, Hu Z, et al.; March of Dimes Prematurity research center at Stanford University School of Medicine. investigation of maternal environmental exposures in association with self-reported preterm birth. Reprod Toxicol. 2014;45:1-7.
30. Lenters V, Portengen L, Smit LA, et al. Phthalates, perfuoroalkyl acids, metals and organochlorines and reproductive function: a multipollutant assessment in greenlandic, Polish and Ukrainian men. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72:385-393.
31. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Just AC, et al. gestational exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and reciprocal social, repetitive, and stereo-typic behaviors in 4-and 5-year-old children: the HOMe study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:513-520.
32. Christensen K, Sobus J, Phillips M, Blessinger T, Lorber M, Tan YM. changes in epidemiologic associations with different exposure metrics: a case study of phthalate exposure associations with body mass index and waist circumference. Environ Int. 2014;73:66-76.
33. Batistatou E, Mcnamee R. Performance of bias-correction methods for exposure measurement error using repeated measurements with and without missing data. Stat Med. 2012;31:3467-3480.
34. Fung KY, Krewski D. evaluation of regression calibration and SiMeX methods in logistic regression when one of the Predictors is subject to additive measurement error. J Epidemiol Biostat. 1999;4:65-74.
35. Van roosbroeck S, Li R, Hoek G, Lebret E, Brunekreef B, Spiegelman D. traffc-related outdoor air pollution and respiratory symptoms in children: the impact of adjustment for exposure measurement error. Epidemiolog Y. 2008;19:409-416.
36. Horick N, Weller E, Milton DK, Gold DR, Li R, Spiegelman D. Home endotoxin exposure and wheeze in infants: correction for bias due to exposure measurement error. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:135-140.
37. Beydoun MA, Kaufman JS, Ibrahim J, Satia JA, Heiss G. Measurement error adjustment in essential fatty acid intake from a food frequency questionnaire: alternative approaches and methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:41.
38. Spiegelman D, McDermott A, Rosner B. regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4 Suppl):1179S-1186S.