The use of conservation biomass feedstocks as potential bioenergy resources in the United Kingdom

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 212, Issue , 2016, Pages 271-279

  Phillips, D ^a   Mitchell, E J S ^a   Lea Langton, A R ^b   Parmar, K R ^a   Jones, J M ^a   Williams, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomass; Combustion; Conservation biofuels; Emissions

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMBUSTION; FEEDSTOCKS; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; STOVES;

BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK; COMBUSTION TEST; CONSERVATION AREAS; DOMESTIC STOVES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; NATURE RESERVES; UNITED KINGDOM; WOOD FEEDSTOCKS;

BIOMASS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; FUEL; BIOFUEL;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS; COMBUSTION; EMISSION CONTROL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; RAISED BOG; REEDBED; RESOURCE ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; ASH; BIOENERGY; BIOMASS; COMBUSTION; ESTUARY; FOREST; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROLYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM; WILDERNESS; CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; WETLAND; WOOD;

UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ESTUARIES; FORESTS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; UNITED KINGDOM; WETLANDS; WOOD;

EID: 84963967743     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.057     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akagi S.K., Yokelson R.J., Wiedinmyer C., Alvarado M.J., Reid J.S., Karl T.J., Crounse D., Wennberg P.O. Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11:4039-4072.
2. Amaral S.S., de Carvalho J.A., Costa M.A.M., Neto T.G.S., Dellani R., Henrique L., Leite S. Comparative study for hardwood and softwood forest biomass: chemical characterization, combustion phases and gas and particulate matter emissions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164:55-63.
3. Bernes C., Jonsson B.G., Junninen J., Löhmus A., Macdonald E., Müller J.J., Sandström J. What is the impact of active management on biodiversity in forests set aside for conservation or restoration? A systematic review protocol. Environ. Evidence 2014, 3:22.
4. Bostrom D., Skoglund N., Grimm A., Boman C., Ohman M., Brostrom M.M., et al. Ash transformation chemistry during combustion of biomass. Energy Fuels 2012, 26(1):85-93.
5. Cowie R., Sutherland W.J., Ditlhogo M.K.M., James R. The effects of conservation management of Reed beds. II. The flora and litter disappearance. J. Appl. Ecol. 1992, 29(2):277-284.
6. Cui X., Hao H., He Z., Stoffella P.J., Yang X. Pyrolysis of wetland biomass waste: potential for carbon sequestration and water remediation. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 173:95-104.
7. DEFRA, 2014. Nature Conservation: Local Sites in Positive Conservation Management in England, 2008-09 to 2013-14, Statistical Release 27 November, 2014.
8. Ditlhogo M.K.M., James R., Laurence B.R., Sutherland W.J. The effects of conservation management of reed beds I. The invertebrates. J. Appl. Ecol. 1992, 29(2):265-276.
9. DUKES Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2015, Department of Energy and Climate Change, HMSO, London.
10. Forestry Statistics Forestry Commission 2015, , UK.
11. Fitzpatrick E.M., Jones J.M., Pourkashanian M., Ross A.B., Williams A., Bartle K.D. Mechanistic aspects of soot formation from the combustion of pine wood. Energy Fuels 2008, 22(6):3771-3778.
12. Fournel S., Marcos B., Godbout S., Heitz M., M., m Predicting gaseous emissions from small-scale combustion of agricultural biomass fuels. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 179:165-172.
13. Friedl A., Padouvas E., Rotter H., Varmuza K. Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental composition. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 544:191-198.
14. Gerssen-Gondelach S.J., Saygin D., Wicke B., Patel M.K., Faaij A.P.C. Competing uses of biomass: assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 40:964-998.
15. Hytonen J., Issakainen J. Effect of repeated harvesting on biomass production and sprouting of Betula pubescens. Biomass Bioenergy 2001, 20:237-245.
16. Jacobson M.Z. Effects of biomass burning on climate accounting for heat and moisture fluxes, black and brown carbon, and cloud absorption effects. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119(14):8980-9002.
17. Kask U., Kask L., Link S. Combustion Characteristics of Reed and its Suitability as a Boiler Fuel 2013/2014, (Mires and Peat. 13, Art. 5).
18. Kobbing J.F., Patuzzi F., Baratieri M., Beckmann V., Thevs N., Zerbe S. Economic evaluation of common reed potential for energy production: a case study in Wuliangsuhai Lake (Inner Mongolia, China). Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 70:315-329.
19. Kuhlman T., Diog V., Koomen E. Exploring the potential of reed as a bioenergy crop in the Netherlands. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 55:41-52.
20. Lemieux P.M., Lutes C.C., Santoianni D.A. Emissions of organic air toxics from open burning: a comprehensive review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2004, 30(1):1-32.
21. McMeeking G.R., Kreidenweis S.M., Baker S., Carrico C.M., Chow J.C., Collett J.L., et al. Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114(D19):D19208.
22. Mitchell E.J.S., Lea-Langton A.R., Jones J.M., Williams A., Layden P., Johnson R. The impact of fuel properties on the emissions from the combustion of biomass and other solid fuels in a fixed bed domestic stove. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 142:115-123.
23. Patuzzi F., Mimmo T., Cesco S., Gasparella A., Baratieri M. Common reeds (Phragmites australis) as sustainable energy source. Experimental and modelling analysis of torrefaction and pyrolysis processes. GCB Bioenergy 2012, 5:367-374.
24. Ranjitkar S., Sujakha N.M., Jati R., Xu J., Schmidt-Vogt D. Yield and household consumption of Rhododendron arboreum as a fuelwood species in Eastern Nepal. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 61:245-253.
25. Read D.J., Freer-Smith P.H., Morison J.I.L., Hanley N., West C.C., Snowdon P. Combating climate change - a role for UK Forests. An Assessment of the Potential of the UK's Trees and Woodlands to Mitigate and Adapt to Climate Change. The Synthesis Report 2009, The Stationary Office, Edinburgh, UK.
26. Sommersacher P., Brunner T., Oberberger I. Fuel indexes: A novel method for the evaluation of relevant combustion properties of new biomass fuels. Energy Fuels 2012, 26:380-390.
27. Sommersacher P., Brunner T., Obernberger I., Kienzl N., Kanzian W. Combustion related characterisation of Miscanthus peat blends applying novel fuel characterisation tools. Fuel 2015, 158:253-262.
28. Welfe A., Gilbert P., Thornley P. Increasing biomass resource availability through supply chain analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 70:249-266.
29. Wichtmann W., Oehmke C., Bärisch S., Deschan F., Malashevich U., Tanneberger F. Combustibility of biomass from wet Fens in Belarus and its potential as a substitute for Peat in fuel briquettes 2014, (Mires and Peat 13, Art. 6).
30. Wichtmann W., Schafer A. Alternative management options for degraded fens-utilisation of biomass from rewetted peatlands. Wetlands, Monitoring, Modelling and management 2007, 273-280. Taylor and Francis, London. T. Okruszko (Ed.).