A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure – 15 Years to SPRINT

Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 721-724

  Myers, Martin G ^a,b  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC SPHYGMOMANOMETER; AUTOMATED OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; VALIDATION PROCESS; WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; HYPERTENSION;

AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION;

EID: 84963815080     PISSN: 15246175     EISSN: 17517176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jch.12820     Document Type: Note

References (42)

1. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in the office – recognizing the problem and proposing the solution. Hypertension. 2010;55:195–200.
2. Kleinert HD, Harshfield GA, Pickering TG, et al. Hypertension. 1984;6:574–578.
3. Myers MG, Reeves RA. White coat phenomenon in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:844–849.
4. Myers MG, Meglis G, Polemidiotis G. The impact of physician versus automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1997;11:491–493.
5. Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:153–159.
6. Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL Jr, et al. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:161–165.
7. White WG, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:107–110.
8. Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:18.
9. Kaczorowski J, Chambers LW, Dolovich L, et al. Improving cardiovascular health at the population level: 39 community cluster randomized trial of Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP). BMJ. 2011;342:d442.
10. Leenen FHH, Dumais J, McInnis N, et al. 2006 Ontario survey on the prevalence and control of hypertension. CMAJ. 2008;178:1441–1449.
11. Myers MG, McInnis NH, Fodor GJ. Leenen: comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:280–283.
12. Wilkins K, Campbell NRC, Joffres MR, et al. Blood pressure in Canadian adults. Health Rep. 2010;21:1–10.
13. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Fam Pract. 2012;29:376–382.
14. Myers MG. Automated blood pressure measurement in routine office practice. Blood Press Monit. 2006;11:59–62.
15. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Optimum frequency of automated blood pressure measurements using an automated sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2008;13:333–338.
16. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A, Tobe SW. Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14:45–47.
17. Myers MG, Valdivieso M. Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting. Blood Press Monit. 2012;17:116–119.
18. Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, et al. Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Chaveles IA, Mousoulis GP. Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:661–666.
19. Myers MG, Oh P, Reeves RA, Joyner CD. Prevalence of white coat effect in treated hypertensive patients in the community. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:591–597.
20. Brown MA, Buddle ML, Martin A. Is resistant hypertension really resistant? Am J Hypertens. 2001;14:1263–1269.
21. Graves JW, Nash C, Burger K, et al. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:823–827.
22. Gustavsen PH, Hoegholm A, Bang LE, Kristensen KS. White coat hypertension is a cardiovascular risk factor. A 10-year follow-up study. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:811–817.
23. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens. 2009;27:280–286.
24. Myers MG. A proposed algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using automated office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2010;28:703–708.
25. Head GA, Mihallidou AS, Duggan KA, et al. Definition of ambulatory blood pressure targets for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in relation to clinic blood pressure: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;340:1104–1111.
26. Burgess SE, MacLaughlin EJ, Smith PA, et al. Blood pressure rising: differences between current clinical and recommended measurement techniques. J Amer Soc Hypertens. 2011;5:484–488.
27. de la Sierra A, Segura J, Banega JR, et al. Clinical features of 8295 patients with resistant hypertension classified on the basis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2011;57:898–902.
28. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomized parallel design controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;342:d286.
29. Campbell NRC, Conradson HE, Kang J, et al. Automated assessment of blood pressure using BpTRU compared with assessments by a trained technician and a clinic nurse. Blood Press Monit. 2005;10:257–262.
30. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14:108–111.
31. Dawes MG, Coats AJ, Juszczak E. Daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure is more effective at predicting mortality than clinic blood pressure. Blood Pressure Monit. 2006;11:111–118.
32. Godwin M, Birtwhistle R, Delva D, et al. Measuring blood pressure in the office setting: manual and automated office measurements in relation to awake ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Fam Pract. 2011;28:110–117.
33. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Chessman M, Kiss A. Can sphygmomanometers designed for self-measurement of blood pressure in the home be used in office practice? Blood Press Monit. 2010;15:300–304.
34. Armstrong D, Matangi M, Brouillard D, Myers MG. Automated office blood pressure – being alone and not location is what matters most. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20:204–208.
35. Greiver M, White D, Kaplan DM, et al. Where should automated blood pressure measurements be taken? Blood Press Monit. 2012;17:137–138.
36. Chambers LW, Kaczorowski J, O'Reilly S, et al. Comparison of blood pressure measurements using an automated blood pressure device in community pharmacies and family physicians' offices: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ Open. 2013;1:E37. doi:10.9778/cmajo.2013005.
37. SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–2116.
38. Cushman WC, Whelton PK, Fine LJ, et al. SPRINT trial results. Latest news in hypertension management. Hypertension. 2016;67:263–265.
39. Rabi DM, Daskalopoulou SS, Padwal RS, et al. The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk and therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27:415–433.
40. Daskalopoulou SS, Rabi DM, Zarnke KB, et al. The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program rcommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:549–568.
41. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Paterson JM, et al. Thresholds for diagnosing hypertension based upon automated office blood pressure measurements and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension. 2015;66:489–495.
42. Mancia G, Fagard R, Krzysztof N, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–1357.