메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 881-891

A reflection on some practices in the use of risk matrices

Author keywords

Risk analysis; Risk assessment; Risk matrix

Indexed keywords

RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA; RISK EVALUATION; RISK LEVELS; RISK MATRIX; RISK SCORING; RISK TREATMENT;

EID: 84873191482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (16)

References (16)
  • 2
    • 84873152221 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To what extent should all the attributes be transformed to one comparable unit when evaluating safety measures?
    • Cambridge
    • Abrahamsen, E.B., Asche, F. and Aven, T. (2011) To what extent should all the attributes be transformed to one comparable unit when evaluating safety measures? The Business Review Cambridge, 19(1), 70-76.
    • (2011) The Business Review , vol.19 , Issue.1 , pp. 70-76
    • Abrahamsen, E.B.1    Asche, F.2    Aven, T.3
  • 5
    • 77949654989 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On how to define, understand and describe risk
    • Aven, T. (2010) On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(6), 623-631.
    • (2010) Reliability Engineering & System Safety , vol.95 , Issue.6 , pp. 623-631
    • Aven, T.1
  • 7
    • 34848875011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On the use of goals, quantitative criteria and requirements in safety management
    • Aven, T., Vinnem, J.E. and Røed, W. (2006) On the Use of Goals, Quantitative Criteria and Requirements in Safety Management. Risk Management - An International Journal, 8, 118-132.
    • (2006) Risk Management - An International Journal , vol.8 , pp. 118-132
    • Aven, T.1    Vinnem, J.E.2    Røed, W.3
  • 9
    • 42249094900 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What's wrong with risk matrices?
    • Cox, L.A. (2008) What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497-512.
    • (2008) Risk Analysis , vol.28 , Issue.2 , pp. 497-512
    • Cox, L.A.1
  • 10
    • 0031127374 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is wrong with criterion FN-lines for judging the tolerability of risk?
    • Evans, A.W. and Verlander, N.Q. (1997) What is wrong with criterion FN-lines for judging the tolerability of risk? Risk Analysis, 17(2), 157-168.
    • (1997) Risk Analysis , vol.17 , Issue.2 , pp. 157-168
    • Evans, A.W.1    Verlander, N.Q.2
  • 11
    • 77953854592 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis (QRA)
    • Flage, R. and Aven, T. (2009) Expressing and communicating uncertainty in relation to quantitative risk analysis (QRA). Reliability & Risk Analysis: Theory & Applications, 2(2), 9-18.
    • (2009) Reliability & Risk Analysis: Theory & Applications , vol.2 , Issue.2 , pp. 9-18
    • Flage, R.1    Aven, T.2
  • 13
    • 77952324838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International Organization for Standardization ISO 31000:2009
    • International Organization for Standardization (2009a) ISO 31000:2009 Risk management - Principles and guidelines.
    • (2009) Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines
  • 14
    • 78649573321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 31010:2009
    • International Organization for Standardization (2009b) ISO/IEC 31010:2009 Risk management - Risk assessment techniques.
    • (2009) Risk Management - Risk Assessment Techniques


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.