The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: A conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1147-1158

  Tiro, Jasmin A ^a   Kamineni, Aruna ^b   Levin, Theodore R ^d   Zheng, Yingye ^c   Schottinger, Joanne S ^e   Rutter, Carolyn M ^b   Corley, Douglas A ^d   Skinner, Celette S ^a   Chubak, Jessica ^b   Doubeni, Chyke A ⁱ   Halm, Ethan A ^a   Gupta, Samir ^f,g   Wernli, Karen J ^b   Klabunde, Carrie ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^f VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENDOSCOPY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POLICY; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84903974200     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1217     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2013. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2013.
2. Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Seeff LC, White A. Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, includingCTcolonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21: 895-904.
3. Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20: 1611-1.
4. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149: 627-8.
5. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134: 1570-95.
6. McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, Pickhardt PJ, Johnson CD, Glick SN, et al. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 2008; 248: 717-0.
7. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010;152: 668-76.
8. Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN. Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27: 1033-6.
9. Taplin SH, Rodgers AB. Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010: 3-0.
10. Taplin SH, Clauser S, Rodgers AB, Breslau E, Rayson D. Interfaces across the cancer continuum offer opportunities to improve the process of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010: 104-0.
11. Taplin SH, Anhang PR, Edwards HM, Foster MK, Breslau ES, Chollette V, et al. Introduction: understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2012; 2012: 2-0.
12. Yano EM, Green LW, Glanz K, Ayanian JZ, Mittman BS, Chollette V, et al. Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum. JNCI Monographs 2012; 2012: 86-99.
13. Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR; RFA-CA-1-3) [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; [updated 2011 Oct 27; cited 2013 Jun 1]. Available from: http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/networks/prospr.
14. Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12: 4-3.
15. Anhang PR, Zapka J,Edwards H, Taplin SH. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010: 38-7.
16. Zapka J, Taplin SH, Price RA, Cranos C, Yabroff R. Factors in quality care-The case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests-problems in the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010: 58-71.
17. Nekhlyudov L, Latosinsky S. The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptomsto diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010: 11-7.
18. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012;143: 844-7.
19. Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW, Kinney AY, Miesfeldt S, Lu KH, et al. Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1507-7.
20. Sewitch MJ, Jiang M, Joseph L, Hilsden RJ, Bitton A. Developing model-based algorithms to identify screening colonoscopies using administrative health databases. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 45.
21. Sewitch MJ, Stein D, Joseph L, Bitton A, Hilsden RJ, Rabeneck L, et al. Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication. Can J Gastroenterol 2010;24: 656-60.
22. Fisher DA, Grubber JM, Castor JM, Coffman CJ. Ascertainment of colonoscopy indication using administrative data. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 1721-5.
23. Weiss NS. Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening. Epidemiol Rev 1994;16: 102-8.
24. Weiss NS. Analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer: how should we deal with tests done in persons with symptoms? Am J Epidemiol 1998;147: 1099-2.
25. Church TR. Screening for colorectal cancer-which strategy is the best? J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103: 1282-3.
26. TaplinSH, Ichikawa L, Yood MU, ManosMM,Geiger AM, Weinmann S, et al. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96: 1518-7.
27. Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmann S, Mouchawar J, Bischoff K, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97: 675-83.
28. Fiscella K, Humiston S, Hendren S, Winters P, Jean-Pierre P, Idris A, et al. Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take? J Health Care Poor Underserved 2011;22: 83-0.
29. Zapka J. Innovative provider-And health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. Med Care 2008;46: S62-7.
30. Zapka J, Taplin SH, Ganz P, Grunfeld E, Sterba K. Multilevel factors affecting quality: examples from the cancer care continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2012;2012: 11-9.
31. Zapka JM, Klabunde CN, Arora NK, Yuan G, Smith JL, Kobrin SC. Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011; 20: 509-1.
32. Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Breslau ES, Zapka JG, Fletcher RH, Ransohoff DF, et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22: 1195-05.
33. Arroyave AM, Penaranda EK, Lewis CL. Organizational change: a way to increase colon, breast and cervical cancer screening in primary care practices. J Community Health 2011;36: 281-8.
34. Haug U, Brenner H. A simulation model for colorectal cancer screening: potential of stool tests with various performance characteristics compared with screening colonoscopy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14: 422-8.
35. Haug U, Brenner H. New stool tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review focusing on performance characteristics and practicalness. Int J Cancer 2005;117: 169-76.
36. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010;116: 544-73.
37. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Changes in risk factors and increases in screening contribute to the decline in colorectal cancer mortality, 1975 to 2000. Gastroenterology 2010;139: 698.
38. van Ballegooijen M, Boer R, Zauber AG. Simulation of colorectal cancer screening: what we do and do not know and does it matter? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010;24: 427-7.
39. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van BM, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008;149: 659-69.
40. Levin TR, Jamieson L, Burley DA, Reyes J, Oehrli M, Caldwell C. Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems. Epidemiol Rev 2011;33: 101-0.
41. Green BB, Wang CY, Anderson ML, Chubak J, Meenan RT, Vernon SW, et al. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2013;158: 301-1.
42. Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, Hammons M, Koch M, Carter E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173: 1725-2.
43. Colorectal Cancer Control Program [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); [updated 2013 Nov 5; cited 2014 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/crccp/.
44. State and County QuickFacts [Internet]. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; [updated 2009 Feb 20; cited 2014 Feb 28]. Available from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html.
45. Area Resource File (ARF): National County-level Health Resource Information Database [Internet]. Fairfax, VA: Health Resources and Services Administration; [updated 2013 Jan 1; cited 2013 Oct 7]. Available from: http://arf.hrsa.gov/.
46. Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA) [Internet]. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [updated 2011 May 9; cited 2014 Feb 28]. Available from: http://hpsafind.hrsa.gov/.
47. Newhouse JP, McClellan M. Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19: 17-4.
48. Martens EP, Pestman WR, de BA, Belitser SV, Klungel OH. Instrumental variables: application and limitations. Epidemiology 2006;17: 260-7.
49. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70: 55.
50. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46: 399-24.
51. McIntoshMW.Instrumental variables when evaluating screening trials: estimating the benefit of detecting cancer by screening. Stat Med 1999;18: 2775-94.
52. Jacob BJ, Sutradhar R, Moineddin R, Baxter NN, Urbach DR. Methodological approaches to population based research of screening procedures in the presence of selection bias and exposure measurement error: colonoscopy and colorectal cancer outcomes in Ontario. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13: 59.
53. Kreft I, De Leeuw J. Introducing multilevel modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
54. Nekhlyudov L, Greene SM, Chubak J, Rabin B, Tuzzio L, Rolnick S, et al. Cancer research network: using integrated healthcare delivery systems as platforms for cancer survivorship research. J Cancer Surviv 2013;7: 55-62.
55. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, Duncan RP, Egede LE, Friedman LS, et al.National Institutes of Health state-of-The-science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010;152: 663-7.
56. Anderson RJ, Amarasingham R, Pickens SS. The quest for quality: perspectives from the safety net. Front Health Serv Manage 2007; 23: 15-8.
57. Pickens S, Boumbulian P, Anderson RJ, Ross S, Phillips S. Community-oriented primary care in action: a Dallas story. Am J Public Health 2002;92: 1728-2.
58. Katz MH, Brigham TM. Transforming a traditional safety net into a coordinated care system: lessons from healthy San Francisco. Health Aff 2011;30: 237-5.
59. Ku L, Regenstein M, Shin P, Mead H, Levy A, Buchanan K, et al.Coordinating and integrating care for safety net patients: lessons from six communities. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University; 2012.
60. Rural-Urban Community Area Codes (RUCAs) [Internet]. Seattle, WA: WWAMI Rural Health Research Center; [updated 2013 Jan 1; cited 2013 Oct 7]. Available from: http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/index.php.
61. Rural-Urban Community Area Codes [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; [updated 2013 Jul 8; cited 2013 Oct 7]. Available from: http://www.ers.usda. gov/data-products/rural- urban-commuting-Area-codes.aspx
62. Report to Congress: Medicare Ambulatory Surgical Center Value-Based Purchasing Implementation Plan [Internet]. Baltimore, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [updated 2013 Apr 11; cited 2013 Oct 7]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ASCPayment/ Downloads/C-ASC-RTC-011.pdf.
63. Conditions for Coverage & Conditions of Participations [Internet]. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); [updated 2013 May 11; cited 2013 Oct 7]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-And- Guidance/Legislation/CFCsAnd-CoPs/index.html.
64. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.