Retraction: "Individual and group performance suffers from social niche disruption" (The American Naturalist, 2016, 776-785);Individual and group performance suffers from social niche disruption

American Naturalist

Volumn 187, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 776-785

  Laskowski, Kate L ^a   Montiglio, Pierre Olivier ^b   Pruitt, Jonathan N ^c  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal personality; Familiarity; Group living; Individual specialization; Social niches; Stegodyphus dumicola

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FAMILIARITY; GROUP BEHAVIOR; NICHE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIALIZATION; SPIDER; WEIGHT;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; STEGODYPHUS DUMICOLA;

ANIMAL; BODY WEIGHT; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPIDER;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; PERSONALITY; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPIDERS;

EID: 84963703111     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: 15375323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/708066     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Avilés, L. 1986. Sex-ratio bias and possible group selection in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. American Naturalist 128:1-12.
2. Avilés, L. 1997. Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent-sociality in spiders. Pages 476-498 in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, eds. The evolution of social behaviour in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Avilés, L., W. P. Maddison, and I. Agnarsson. 2006. A new independently derived social spider with explosive colony proliferation and a female size dimorphism. Biotropica 38:743-753.
4. Bell, A. M., S. J. Hankison, and K. L. Laskowski. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour 77:771-783.
5. Bergmüller, R., andM. Taborsky. 2010. Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:504-511.
6. Carter, A. J., S. English, and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 2014. Cooperative personalities and social niche specialization in female meerkats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27:815-825.
7. Clark, C. W. 1994. Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle. Behavioral Ecology 5:159-170.
8. Dingemanse, N. J., and N. A. Dochtermann. 2013. Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. Journal of Animal Ecology 82:39-54.
9. Dingemanse, N. J., and M. Wolf. 2010. Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365:3947-3958.
10. Farine, D., P.-O. Montiglio, and O. Spiegel. 2015. From individuals to groups and back: the evolutionary implications of group phenotypic composition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30:609-621.
11. Favati, A., O. Leimar, T. Radesäter, and H. Løvlie. 2014. Social status and personality: stability in social state can promote consistency of behavioural responses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:201 32531.
12. Gordon, D. M. 1996. The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380:121-124.
13. Grinsted, L., J. N. Pruitt, V. Settepani, and T. Bilde. 2013. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280:20131407.
14. Holbrook, C. T., C. M. Wright, and J. N. Pruitt. 2014. Individual differences in personality and behavioural plasticity facilitate division of labour in social spider colonies. Animal Behaviour 97:177-183.
15. Jeanson, R., R. M. Clark, C. T. Holbrook, S. M. Bertram, J. H. Fewell, and P. F. Kukuk. 2008. Division of labour and socially induced changes in response thresholds in associations of solitary halictine bees. Animal Behaviour 76:593-602.
16. Jeanson, R., and J. H. Fewell. 2008. Influence of the social context on division of labor in ant foundress associations. Behavioral Ecology 19:567-574.
17. Keiser, C., D. Jones, A. Modlmeier, and J. Pruitt. 2014. Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68:839-850.
18. Laskowski, K. L., and A. Bell. 2014. Strong personalities, not social niches, drive individual differences in social behaviour in sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour 90:287-295.
19. Laskowski, K. L., P.-O. Montiglio, and J. N. Pruitt. 2016. Data from: Individual and group performance suffers from social niche disruption. American Naturalist, Dryad Digital Repository, http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.33f0n.
20. Laskowski, K. L., and J. N. Pruitt. 2014. Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:20133166.
21. Lubin, Y., and T. Bilde. 2007. The evolution of sociality in spiders. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 37:83-145.
22. Modlmeier, A. P., K. L. Laskowski, A. E. DeMarco, A. Coleman, K. Zhao, H. A. Brittingham, D. R. McDermott, et al. 2014. Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider. Biology Letters 10:20140419.
23. Montiglio, P.-O., C. Ferrari, and D. Réale. 2013. Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368:20120343.
24. Nakagawa, S., and H. Schielzeth. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews 85:935-956.
25. Oster, G. F., and E. O. Wilson. 1978. Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. Pruitt, J. N., and C. J. Goodnight. 2014. Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions. Nature 514:359-362.
27. Pruitt, J. N., L. Grinsted, and V. Settepani. 2013. Linking levels of personality: personalities of the “average” and “most extreme” group members predict colony-level personality. Animal Behaviour 86: 391-399.
28. Pruitt, J. N., and C. N. Keiser. 2014. The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies’ collective behaviour and success. Animal Behaviour 93:87-95.
29. Pruitt, J. N., and N. Pinter-Wollman. 2015. The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282:20151766.
30. Pruitt, J. N., S. E. Riechert, and T. C. Jones. 2008. Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider, Anelosimus studiosus. Animal Behaviour 76:871-879.
31. Riechert, S. E., and A. V. Hedrick. 1990. Levels of predation and genetically based anti-predator behaviour in the spider, Agelenopsis aperta. Animal Behaviour 40:679-687.
32. Rypstra, A. L. 1993. Prey size, social competition, and the development of reproductive division of labor in social spider groups. American Naturalist 142:868-880.
33. Salomon, M., D. Mayntz, and Y. Lubin. 2008. Colony nutrition skews reproduction in a social spider. Behavioral Ecology 19:605-611.
34. Settepani, V., L. Grinsted, J. Granfeldt, J. L. Jensen, and T. Bilde. 2013. Task specialization in two social spiders, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Eresidae) and Anelosimus eximius (Theridiidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26:51-62.
35. Sih, A., K. J. Mathot, M. Moirón, P.-O. Montiglio, M. Wolf, and N. J. Dingemanse. 2015. Animal personality and state-behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30:50-60.
36. Smith, B. R., and D. T. Blumstein. 2008. Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology 19:448-455.
37. Vollrath, F., and D. Rohde-Arndt. 1983. Prey capture and feeding in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 61:334-340.
38. Wickler, W., and U. Seibt. 1993. Pedogenetic sociogenesis via the “sibling-route” and some consequences for Stegodyphus spiders. Ethology 95:1-18.
39. Wilson, E. O. 1987. Causes of ecological success: the case of the ants. Journal of Animal Ecology 56:1-9.
40. Wolf, M., and F. J. Weissing. 2010. An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365:3959-3968.
41. Wright, C. M., C. T. Holbrook, and J. N. Pruitt. 2014. Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111:9533-9537.
42. Wright, C. M., C. N. Keiser, and J. N. Pruitt. 2015. Personality and morphology shape task participation, collective foraging and escape behaviour in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Animal Behaviour 105:47-54.