Interactive social media interventions to promote health equity: An overview of reviews

Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 63-75

  Welch, Vivian ^a   Petkovic, J ^a   Pardo Pardo, J ^a   Rader, T ^b   Tugwell, P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disadvantaged populations; Health equity; Health promotion; Public health; Social media

Indexed keywords

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EQUITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; LITERATURE; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL MEDIA;

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EQUITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84963602668     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2368738X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.4.01     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Van Wagenen SA, Hanson CL, West JH, Barnes MD, et al. Use of social media in health promotion: purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):159-64.
2. Public Health Agency of Canada. Public Health PHAC [Internet]. @PHAC_GC; 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 17]. Available from: https://twitter.com/phac_gc
3. Public Health Agency of Canada. Public Health Agency of Canada. Government Organisation [Internet]. Menlo Park (CA): Facebook; 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.facebook.com/Public-Health-Agency-of-Canada-10860597051/timeline/
4. Davies J, Mai D, Williams M, Dhaliwal M, Brankley L, McColl K; Social Media & Technology Project Team. Environmental scan of social media at Ontario Public Health Units: analyzing the effectiveness of social media planning, implementation and evaluation at Health Units in Ontario. Guelph (ON): Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health; 2013.
5. Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smitth A, Zickuhr K. Social media and young adults [Internet]. Washington (DC): Pew Research Center; 2010 Feb 3 [cited 2015 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/02/03/social-media-and-young-adults/
6. Statistics Canada. Table 358-0153. Canadian Internet use survey, Internet use, by age group, Internet activity, sex, level of education and household income, occasional (percent) [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): CANSIM database; [modified 2013 Oct 28; cited 2014 Nov 04]. Available from: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?id¼3580153&retrLang¼eng&lang¼eng
7. Kietzmann JH, Hermkens K, McCarthy IP, Silvestre BS. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus Horizons.2011;54(3):241-51.
8. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1933.
9. Chang T, Chopra V, Zhang C, Woolford SJ. The role of social media in online weight management: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e262. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2852.
10. Bailey JV, Murray E, Rait G, et al. Computerbased interventions for sexual health promotion: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23(6):408-13. DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.011221.
11. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2005(4): CD004274.
12. Newton MS, Ciliska D. Internet-based innovations for the prevention of eating disorders: a systematic review. Eat Disor. 2006;14(5):365-84.
13. Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(2): 190-3. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2012-201257.
14. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Services. 1992;22(3):429-45.
15. O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JP. Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews of intervention: Cochrane Book Series Collaboration. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
16. Meglic M, Lamut A, Sinkovec A, Yared W. Chapter 3: Online social media as a tool to improve cancer prevention and health promotion. In: Boosting innovation and cooperation in European cancer control: key findings from the European Partnership for Action Against Cancer. Martin-Moreno JM, Albreht T, Rados Krnel S [Eds] Ljubljana: National Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia; Brussels: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2013. ISBN 978-961-6911-22-1.
17. Sterne J. Social media metrics: how to measure and optimize your marketing investment. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
18. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000387. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387.
19. French B, Day E, Watkins C, et al. The challenges of implementing a telestroke network: a systematic review and case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:125. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-125.
20. Jackson N, Waters E. Guidelines for systematic reviews in health promotion and public health taskforce. Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promot Int. 2005;20(4):367-74.
21. O’Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clinical Epidemiology. 2014;67(1): 56-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005.
22. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10.
23. Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E, et al. EPC Methods: an exploration of methods and context for the production of rapid reviews. Research White Paper. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015.
24. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330(7482):68.
25. Sampson M, McGowan J, Lefebvre C, Moher D, Grimshaw J. PRESS: peer review of electronic search strategies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2008.
26. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009.
27. Welch V, Brand K, Kristjansson E, Smylie J, Wells G, Tugwell P. Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm. BMC Med Res Method. 2012;12:187. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-187.
28. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Health rquity impact assessment (HEIA) workbook. Toronto (ON): Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2012.
29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
30. Williams G, Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Vandermeer B, Hartling L. Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2014;4(2):e003926.
31. Lai MH, Maniam T, Chan LF, Ravindran AV. Caught in the web: a review of web-based suicide prevention. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e30. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2973.
32. Medina EL, Loques Filho O, Mesquita CT. Health social networks as online life support groups for patients with cardiovascular diseases. Arq Bras Cardio. 2013;101(2):e39-45.
33. Nef T, Ganea RL, Muri RM, Mosimann UP. Social networking sites and older users - a systematic review. Int Psychogeriat. 2013; 25(7):1041-53.
34. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004;328(7449):1166.
35. Hong Y, Pena-Purcell NC, Ory MG. Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(3): 288-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.014.
36. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and metaanalysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
37. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
38. Povall SL, Haigh FA, Abrahams D, Scott- Samuel A. Health equity impact assessment. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(4):621-33. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dat012.
39. Griffiths KM, Calear AL, Banfield M. Systematic review on Internet support groups (ISGs) and depression (1): do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms?. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e40. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1270.
40. Nieto R, Miro J, Huguet A. [New information and communication technologies in the treatment of chronic pain]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2008;55:426-33.