-
1
-
-
0037321596
-
Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality
-
M.G.Alexander,, & T.D.Fisher, (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35. doi:10.1080/00224490309552164
-
(2003)
Journal of Sex Research
, vol.40
, pp. 27-35
-
-
Alexander, M.G.1
Fisher, T.D.2
-
2
-
-
84878791511
-
A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality?
-
R.Allison,, & B.Risman, (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006
-
(2013)
Social Science Research
, vol.42
, pp. 1191-1206
-
-
Allison, R.1
Risman, B.2
-
3
-
-
0003695958
-
-
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
-
F.H.Allport, (1933). Institutional behavior. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
-
(1933)
Institutional behavior
-
-
Allport, F.H.1
-
4
-
-
84861749558
-
Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships
-
E.A.Armstrong,, P.England,, & A.C.K.Fogarty, (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802
-
(2012)
American Sociological Review
, vol.77
, pp. 435-462
-
-
Armstrong, E.A.1
England, P.2
Fogarty, A.C.K.3
-
5
-
-
85055407571
-
Is hooking up bad for young women?
-
E.A.Armstrong,, L.Hamilton,, & P.England, (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9, 22–27. doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22
-
(2010)
Contexts
, vol.9
, pp. 22-27
-
-
Armstrong, E.A.1
Hamilton, L.2
England, P.3
-
7
-
-
77952950783
-
To hook up or date? Which gender benefits?
-
C.Bradshaw,, A.S.Kahn,, & B.K.Saville, (2010). To hook up or date? Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7
-
(2010)
Sex Roles
, vol.62
, pp. 661-669
-
-
Bradshaw, C.1
Kahn, A.S.2
Saville, B.K.3
-
8
-
-
0037322163
-
Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research
-
M.Crawford,, & D.Popp, (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163
-
(2003)
Journal of Sex Research
, vol.40
, pp. 13-26
-
-
Crawford, M.1
Popp, D.2
-
9
-
-
84884469347
-
Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture
-
D.Currier, (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender and Society, 27, 704–727. doi:10.1177/0891243213493960
-
(2013)
Gender and Society
, vol.27
, pp. 704-727
-
-
Currier, D.1
-
10
-
-
77953906745
-
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students
-
R.L.Fielder,, & M.P.Carey, (2010). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118
-
(2010)
Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy
, vol.36
, pp. 346-359
-
-
Fielder, R.L.1
Carey, M.P.2
-
11
-
-
84874946018
-
Gender roles and pressure to be truthful: The bogus pipeline modifies gender differences in sexual but not non-sexual behavior
-
T.D.Fisher, (2013). Gender roles and pressure to be truthful: The bogus pipeline modifies gender differences in sexual but not non-sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 68, 401–414. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0266-3
-
(2013)
Sex Roles
, vol.68
, pp. 401-414
-
-
Fisher, T.D.1
-
12
-
-
33845993261
-
Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response
-
W.F.Flack,, Jr., K.A.Daubman,, M.L.Caron,, J.A.Asadorian,, N.R.D’Aureli,, S.N.Gigliotti,, & E.R.Stine, (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. doi:10.1177/0886260506295354
-
(2007)
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
, vol.22
, pp. 139-157
-
-
Flack, W.F.1
Daubman, K.A.2
Caron, M.L.3
Asadorian, J.A.4
D’Aureli, N.R.5
Gigliotti, S.N.6
Stine, E.R.7
-
13
-
-
33746597060
-
Changes in college women’s attitudes toward sexual intimacy
-
S.K.Gilmartin, (2006). Changes in college women’s attitudes toward sexual intimacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 429–454. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00501.x
-
(2006)
Journal of Research on Adolescence
, vol.16
, pp. 429-454
-
-
Gilmartin, S.K.1
-
14
-
-
8644255753
-
-
New York, NY: Institute for American Values
-
N.Glenn,, & E.Marquardt, (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.
-
(2001)
Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today
-
-
Glenn, N.1
Marquardt, E.2
-
15
-
-
27244447174
-
Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships
-
K.Greene,, & S.L.Faulkner, (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239–251. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
-
(2005)
Sex Roles
, vol.53
, pp. 239-251
-
-
Greene, K.1
Faulkner, S.L.2
-
16
-
-
70350073687
-
Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options
-
L.Hamilton,, & E.A.Armstrong, (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender and Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/0891243209345829
-
(2009)
Gender and Society
, vol.23
, pp. 589-616
-
-
Hamilton, L.1
Armstrong, E.A.2
-
17
-
-
65049089594
-
Common versus uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard
-
P.K.Jonason,, & M.J.Marks, (2009). Common versus uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60, 357–365. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z
-
(2009)
Sex Roles
, vol.60
, pp. 357-365
-
-
Jonason, P.K.1
Marks, M.J.2
-
18
-
-
79952000894
-
Hooking up: Hot hetero sex or the new numb normative?
-
R.Kalish,, & M.Kimmel, (2011). Hooking up: Hot hetero sex or the new numb normative? Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 137–151. doi:10.1080/08164649.2011.546333
-
(2011)
Australian Feminist Studies
, vol.26
, pp. 137-151
-
-
Kalish, R.1
Kimmel, M.2
-
19
-
-
79952110043
-
Going along with it: Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex
-
J.Katz,, & V.Tirone, (2010). Going along with it: Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex. Violence Against Women, 16, 730–742. doi:10.1177/1077801210374867
-
(2010)
Violence Against Women
, vol.16
, pp. 730-742
-
-
Katz, J.1
Tirone, V.2
-
21
-
-
84973759298
-
Hidden power in marriage
-
A.Komter, (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187–216. doi:10.1177/089124389003002003
-
(1989)
Gender and Society
, vol.3
, pp. 187-216
-
-
Komter, A.1
-
22
-
-
68649085388
-
The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance
-
D.A.Kreager,, & J.Staff, (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164. doi:10.1177/019027250907200205
-
(2009)
Social Psychology Quarterly
, vol.72
, pp. 143-164
-
-
Kreager, D.A.1
Staff, J.2
-
23
-
-
84869222954
-
Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students
-
M.A.Lewis,, H.Granato,, J.A.Blayney,, T.W.Lostutter,, & J.R.Kilmer, (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2
-
(2012)
Archives of Sexual Behavior
, vol.41
, pp. 1219-1229
-
-
Lewis, M.A.1
Granato, H.2
Blayney, J.A.3
Lostutter, T.W.4
Kilmer, J.R.5
-
24
-
-
47549115412
-
Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard
-
M.J.Marks, (2008). Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 84–91. doi:10.1080/01973530701866664
-
(2008)
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
, vol.30
, pp. 84-91
-
-
Marks, M.J.1
-
25
-
-
14944356299
-
The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction?
-
M.J.Marks,, & R.C.Fraley, (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5
-
(2005)
Sex Roles
, vol.52
, pp. 175-186
-
-
Marks, M.J.1
Fraley, R.C.2
-
26
-
-
33644521759
-
Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard
-
M.J.Marks,, & R.C.Fraley, (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 54, 19–26. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9
-
(2006)
Sex Roles
, vol.54
, pp. 19-26
-
-
Marks, M.J.1
Fraley, R.C.2
-
27
-
-
34447248995
-
The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard
-
M.J.Marks,, & R.C.Fraley, (2007). The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard. Social Influence, 2, 29–54. doi:10.1080/15534510601154413
-
(2007)
Social Influence
, vol.2
, pp. 29-54
-
-
Marks, M.J.1
Fraley, R.C.2
-
29
-
-
79952484706
-
Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters
-
J.J.Owen,, & F.D.Fincham, (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
-
(2011)
Archives of Sexual Behavior
, vol.40
, pp. 321-330
-
-
Owen, J.J.1
Fincham, F.D.2
-
30
-
-
84901277625
-
Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women
-
J.J.Owen,, K.Quirk,, & F.D.Fincham, (2014). Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40(5), 396–409. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751074
-
(2014)
Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy
, vol.40
, Issue.5
, pp. 396-409
-
-
Owen, J.J.1
Quirk, K.2
Fincham, F.D.3
-
31
-
-
77952093055
-
Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates
-
J.J.Owen,, G.K.Rhoades,, S.M.Stanley,, & F.D.Fincham, (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
-
(2010)
Archives of Sexual Behavior
, vol.39
, pp. 653-663
-
-
Owen, J.J.1
Rhoades, G.K.2
Stanley, S.M.3
Fincham, F.D.4
-
32
-
-
80052788115
-
Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard
-
J.A.Reid,, S.Elliott,, & G.R.Webber, (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender and Society, 25, 545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642
-
(2011)
Gender and Society
, vol.25
, pp. 545-568
-
-
Reid, J.A.1
Elliott, S.2
Webber, G.R.3
-
34
-
-
3142784320
-
Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism
-
B.J.Risman, (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society, 18, 429–450. doi:10.1177/0891243204265349
-
(2004)
Gender and Society
, vol.18
, pp. 429-450
-
-
Risman, B.J.1
-
35
-
-
79960804735
-
Factors influencing university students’ explicit and implicit double standards
-
J.K.Sakaluk,, & R.R.Milhausen, (2012). Factors influencing university students’ explicit and implicit double standards. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 464–476. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.569976
-
(2012)
Journal of Sex Research
, vol.49
, pp. 464-476
-
-
Sakaluk, J.K.1
Milhausen, R.R.2
-
36
-
-
30344441661
-
Guidelines for developing rape prevention and risk reduction interventions
-
Schewe P.A., (ed), Washington, DC: APA Books
-
P.A.Schewe, (2002). Guidelines for developing rape prevention and risk reduction interventions. In P.A.Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 107–136). Washington, DC: APA Books.
-
(2002)
Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span
-
-
Schewe, P.A.1
-
37
-
-
0034549610
-
Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis
-
M.Schwalbe,, S.Godwin,, D.Holden,, D.Schrock,, S.Thompson,, & M.Wolkomir, (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419–452. doi:10.1093/sf/79.2.419
-
(2000)
Social Forces
, vol.79
, pp. 419-452
-
-
Schwalbe, M.1
Godwin, S.2
Holden, D.3
Schrock, D.4
Thompson, S.5
Wolkomir, M.6
-
38
-
-
0037321809
-
Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take no for an answer
-
C.Struckman-Johnson,, D.Struckman-Johnson,, & P.B.Anderson, (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take no for an answer. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 76–86. doi:10.1080/00224490309552168
-
(2003)
Journal of Sex Research
, vol.40
, pp. 76-86
-
-
Struckman-Johnson, C.1
Struckman-Johnson, D.2
Anderson, P.B.3
-
40
-
-
84883350118
-
Hooking up and opting out: Negotiating sex in the first year of college
-
Carpenter L.M., DeLamater J., (eds), New York: New York University Press
-
L.Wade,, & C.Heldman, (2012). Hooking up and opting out: Negotiating sex in the first year of college. In L.M.Carpenter & J.DeLamater (Eds.), Sex for life: From virginity to Viagra: How sexuality changes throughout our lives (pp. 128–145). New York: New York University Press.
-
(2012)
Sex for life: From virginity to Viagra: How sexuality changes throughout our lives
-
-
Wade, L.1
Heldman, C.2
-
42
-
-
77952954781
-
Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns
-
M.O.Wright,, D.L.Norton,, & J.A.Matusek, (2010). Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62, 647–660. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9
-
(2010)
Sex Roles
, vol.62
, pp. 647-660
-
-
Wright, M.O.1
Norton, D.L.2
Matusek, J.A.3
-
43
-
-
49249117042
-
When social situations take a turn for the worse: Situational and interpersonal risk factors for sexual aggression
-
E.A.Yeater,, K.L.Lenberg,, C.Avina,, J.K.Rinehart,, & W.O’Donohue, (2008). When social situations take a turn for the worse: Situational and interpersonal risk factors for sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 59, 151–163. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9437-z
-
(2008)
Sex Roles
, vol.59
, pp. 151-163
-
-
Yeater, E.A.1
Lenberg, K.L.2
Avina, C.3
Rinehart, J.K.4
O’Donohue, W.5
|