To hook up or date: Which gender benefits?

Sex Roles

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 661-669

  Bradshaw, Carolyn ^a   Kahn, Arnold S ^a   Saville, Bryan K ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dating; Gender differences; Hooking up

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952950783     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bartoli, A. M., & Clark, M. D. (2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality & Culture, 10, 54-80.
2. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
3. Cohen, L. L., & Shotland, R. L. (1996). Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectation, experiences, and perceptions of others. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 291-299.
4. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13-26.
5. Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookup and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77-89.
6. Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48-78). New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sexing college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255-267.
8. Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 25, 26-43.
9. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2005). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Lanham: University Press of America.
10. Himadi, W. G., Arkowitz, H., Hinton, R., & Perl, J. (1980). Minimal dating and its relationship to other social problems and dating adjustment. Behavior Therapy, 11, 345-352.
11. Kahn, A. S., Fricker, K, Hoffman, J. L., Lambert, T. A., & Tripp, M. C. (2000, March). Hooking up: A dangerous new sexual behavior? Poster presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
12. Knox, D., & Wilson, K. (1981). Dating behaviors of university students. Family Relations, 30, 255-258.
13. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129-133.
14. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488-500.
15. Leck, K. (2006). Correlates of minimal dating. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 549-567.
16. Leigh, B. C. (1989). Reasons for having and avoiding sex: Gender, sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 199-209.
17. Lenton, A. P., & Bryan, A. (2005). An affair to remember: The role of sexual scripts in perceptions of sexual intent. Personal Relationships, 12, 483-498.
18. Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Loangmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of nonrelationship sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459-483.
19. Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175-186.
20. Medley-Rath, S. R. (2007). Am I still a virgin?: What counts as sex in 20 years of Seventeen. Sexuality and Culture, 11, 24-38.
21. Mongeau, P. A., & Carey, C. M. (1996). Who's wooing whom II? An experimental investigation of date-initiation and expectancy violation. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 195-213.
22. Mongeau, P. A., Morr Serewicz, M. C., & Therrien, L. F. (2004). Goals for cross-sex first dates: Identification, measurement, and the influence of contextual factors. Communication Monographs, 72, 121-147.
23. Mongeau, P. A., Jacobsen, J., & Donnerstein, C. (2007). Defining dates and first date goals: Generalizing from undergraduates to single adults. Communication Research, 34, 526-547.
24. Morr Serewicz, M. C., & Gale, E. (2008). First-date scripts: Gender roles, context, and relationship. Sex Roles, 58, 149-164.
25. Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297-309.
26. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 129-151.
27. Öner, B. (2000). Relationship satisfaction and dating experience: Factors affecting future time orientation in relationships with the opposite sex. Journal of Psychology, 134, 527-536.
28. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of 'casual' sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639-661.
29. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, K. A. (2000). Hookups: Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76-88.
30. Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women's reflections on sexuality and domination. NYU Press.
31. Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1995). Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female sexual desire. Personal Relationships, 2, 345-358.
32. Roscoe, B., Diana, M. S., & Brooks, R. H. (1987). Early, middle, and late adolescents' views on dating and factors influencing partner selection. Adolescence, 85, 59-68.
33. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499-510.
34. Smith, G., Mysak, K., & Michael, S. (2008). Sexual double standards and sexually transmitted illnesses: Social rejection and stigmatization of women. Sex Roles, 58, 391-401.
35. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the decent of man (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.