The same in German as in English? Investigating the subject-specificity of teaching quality;Wie in Deutsch, so in Englisch? Zur Fachspezifität von Unterrichtsqualität

Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 191-209

  Praetorius, Anna Katharina ^a   Vieluf, Svenja ^a   Saß, Steffani ^b   Bernholt, Andrea ^b   Klieme, Eckhard ^a  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION   (Germany)

Author keywords

Generalizability theory; Subject specificity; Teacher effectiveness; Teaching quality; Value added model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963548460     PISSN: 1434663X     EISSN: 18625215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11618-015-0660-4     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems came out on top. London: McKinsey.
2. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.
3. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., & Jordan, A. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.
4. Borg, W. R., & Ascione, F. R. (1982). Classroom management in elementary mainstreaming classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 85–95.
5. Brennan, R. L. (2001a). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.
6. Brennan, R. L. (2001b). Manual for urGenova (Version 2.1). Iowa City: Iowa Testing Programs, University of Iowa.
7. Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069–1077.
8. Chetty, R., Friedmann, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2013). Measuring the impact of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. NBER Working Paper No. 19423.
9. Cohen, D. K. (1993). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143.
11. Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.
12. Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207–234.
13. DESI-Konsortium (Ed.) (2008). Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch: Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie. Weinheim: Beltz.
14. Eichler, W. (2008). Sprachbewusstheit Deutsch. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie (pp. 149–156). Weinheim: Beltz.
15. Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36, 103–112.
16. Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9.
17. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P., Treiman, D. J., & De Leeuw, J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1–56.
18. Goldhaber, D., Cowan, J., & Walch, J. (2012). Is a good elementary teacher always good? Assessing teacher performance estimates across subjects. CEDR working paper 2012—7.2. Seattle: University of Washington.
19. Grossman, P., Cohen, J., Ronfeldt, M., & Brown, L. (2014). The test matters: The relationship between classroom observation scores and teacher value added on multiple types of assessment. Educational Researcher, 43, 293–303.
20. Haertel, E. H. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores. Princeton: Education Testing Service.
21. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100, 267–271.
22. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 131–157.
23. Harsch, C., & Schröder, K. (2008). Textrekonstruktion Englisch. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie (pp. 149–156). Weinheim: Beltz.
24. Hartig, J., Jude, N., & Wagner, W. (2008). Methodische Grundlagen der Messung und Erklärung sprachlicher Kompetenzen. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie (pp. 34–54). Weinheim: Beltz.
25. Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 92–102.
26. Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the G-study. Educational Researcher, 41, 56–64.
27. Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598.
28. Kersting, N. B., Chen, M.-K., & Stigler, J. W. (2013). Value-Added Teacher Estimates as Part of Teacher Evaluations: Exploring the Effects of Data and Model Specifications on the Stability of Teacher-Value Added Scores (Special issue on value-added research for policy). Educational Policy Analysis Archives.
29. Klieme, E., & Rakoczy, K. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität aus Schülerperspektive: Kulturspezifische Profile, regionale Unterschiede und Zusammenhänge mit Effekten von Unterricht. In J. Baumert, C. Artelt, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, & K.-J. Tillmann (Eds.), PISA 2000. Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 334–359). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
30. Klieme, E., & Vieluf, S. (2009). Teaching practices, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes. In OECD (Ed.), Creating effective teaching and learning environments. First results from TALIS (pp. 87–135). Paris: OECD.
31. Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: Aufgabenkultur und Unterrichtsgestaltung. In Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (Ed.), TIMSS—Impulse für Schule und Unterricht. Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitiativen, Praxisberichte und Video-Dokumente (pp. 43–57). Munich: Medienhaus Biering.
32. Koedel, C., & Betts, J. (2007). Re-Examining the Role of Teacher Quality In the Educational Production Function (Working Papers 0708, Department of Economics, University of Missouri).
33. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34. Kunter, M. (2005). Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht. Münster: Waxmann.
35. Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805–820.
36. Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19, 527–537.
37. Loeb, S., & Candelaria, C. A. (2013). How stable are value-added estimates across years, subjects and student groups? http://www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/briefs/value-added/value-added-stability/. Accessed 10 Sept 2015.
38. Loeb, S., Kalogrides, D., & Beteille, T. (2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 269–304.
39. Lotz, M. (2016). Kognitive Aktivierung im Leseunterricht der Grundschule. Eine Videostudie zur Gestaltung und Qualität von Leseübungen im ersten Schuljahr. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
40. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
41. McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67–101.
42. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998–2012). Mplus (Version 7.11). Los Angeles: StatModel.
43. Papay, J. P. (2011). Different test, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 163–193.
44. Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2014). Is effective teaching stable? The Journal of Experimental Education, 11, 1–25.
45. Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83–98.
46. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119.
47. Piwowar, V., Thiel, F., & Ophardt, D. (2013). Training inservice teachers’ competencies in classroom management—a quasi-experimental study with teachers of secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 1–12.
48. Praetorius, A.-K., Lenske, G., & Helmke, A. (2012). Observer ratings of instructional quality: Do they fulfill what they promise? Learning and Instruction, 6, 387–400.
49. Praetorius, A.-K., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014). One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction, 31, 2–12.
50. Prange, K. (2011). Didaktik und Methodik. In J. Kade, W. Helsper, C. Lüders, B. Egloff, F.-O. Radtke, & W. Thole (Eds.), Pädagogisches Wissen. Erziehungswissenschaft in Grundbegriffen (pp. 183–190). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
51. Rakoczy, K. (2008). Motivationsunterstützung im Mathematikunterricht – Unterricht aus der Perspektive von Lernenden und Beobachtern. Münster: Waxmann.
52. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
53. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.
54. Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 700–712.
55. Rjosk, C., Richter, D., Hochweber, J., Lüdtke, O., Klieme, E., & Stanat, P. (2014). Socioeconomic and language minority classroom composition and individual reading achievement: The mediating role of teaching quality. Learning and Instruction, 32, 63–72.
56. Rost, J. (2004). Lehrbuch Testtheorie – Testkonstruktion (2nd edn.). Bern: Huber.
57. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools (Conceptual Paper). Michigan: University of Michigan.
58. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: Role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.
59. Shavelson, R., & Webb, N. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
60. Shumate, S. R., Surles, J., Johnson, R. L., & Penny, J. (2007). The effects of the number of scale points and non-normality on the generalizability coefficient: A Monte Carlo study. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 357–376.
61. Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1993). Form 5 cognitive abilities test – norms booklet. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.
62. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001) Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
63. Vieluf, S., & Klieme, E. (2011). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs about the nature of teaching and learning and their classroom teaching practices in cross-cultural comparison. In G. Kaiser & Y. Li (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction. An international perspective (pp. 295–325). New York: Springer.
64. Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S., & Looney, L. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 193–202.