Ryk controls remapping of motor cortex during functional recovery after spinal cord injury

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 697-705

  Hollis, Edmund R ^a,c,d   Ishiko, Nao ^a   Yu, Ting ^a   Lu, Chin Chun ^a   Haimovich, Ariela ^a   Tolentino, Kristine ^a   Richman, Alisha ^a   Tury, Anna ^a   Wang, Shih Hsiu ^b,c,e   Pessian, Maysam ^a   Jo, Euna ^a   Kolodkin, Alex ^b   Zou, Yimin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BURKE MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d FEIL FAMILY BRAIN AND MIND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e Columbia University School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRIZZLED PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RYK PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; RYK PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HETEROZYGOTE; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR CORTEX; NONHUMAN; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REHABILITATION CARE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WILD TYPE; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; CONVALESCENCE; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; KINESIOTHERAPY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; BRAIN MAPPING; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FORELIMB; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PYRAMIDAL TRACTS; RATS; RECEPTOR PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 84963517892     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.4282     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lemon, R.N. & Griffiths, J. Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve 32, 261-279 (2005).
2. Whishaw, I.Q., Pellis, S.M., Gorny, B.P. & Pellis, V.C. The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: An endpoint, video recording, and movement notation analysis. Behav. Brain Res. 42, 77-91 (1991).
3. Metz, G.A.S., Dietz, V., Schwab, M.E. & van de Meent, H. The effects of unilateral pyramidal tract section on hindlimb motor performance in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 96, 37-46 (1998).
4. Schmidlin, E., Wannier, T., Bloch, J. & Rouiller, E.M. Progressive plastic changes in the hand representation of the primary motor cortex parallel incomplete recovery from a unilateral section of the corticospinal tract at cervical level in monkeys. Brain Res. 1017, 172-183 (2004).
5. Weidner, N., Ner, A., Salimi, N. & Tuszynski, M.H. Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3513-3518 (2001).
6. Liu, Y. et al. Ryk-mediated Wnt repulsion regulates posterior-directed growth of corticospinal tract. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1151-1159 (2005).
7. Liu, Y. et al. Repulsive Wnt signaling inhibits axon regeneration after CNS injury. J. Neurosci. 28, 8376-8382 (2008).
8. Hollis, E.R. II et al. Remodeling of spared proprioceptive circuit involving a small number of neurons supports functional recovery. Nat. Commun. 6, 6079 (2015).
9. Hollis, E.R. II & Zou, Y. Reinduced Wnt signaling limits regenerative potential of sensory axons in the spinal cord following conditioning lesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14663-14668 (2012).
10. Bareyre, F.M. et al. The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 269-277 (2004).
11. Ghosh, A. et al. Rewiring of hindlimb corticospinal neurons after spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 97-104 (2010).
12. Takeoka, A., Vollenweider, I., Courtine, G. & Arber, S. Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell 159, 1626-1639 (2014).
13. van den Brand, R. et al. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science 336, 1182-1185 (2012).
14. Giger, R.J., Hollis, E.R. II & Tuszynski, M.H. Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a001867 (2010).
15. Hollis, E.R. II. Axon guidance molecules and neural circuit remodeling after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics doi:10.1007/s13311-015-0416-0 (2015).
16. Lyuksyutova, A.I. et al. Anterior-posterior guidance of commissural axons by Wnt-frizzled signaling. Science 302, 1984-1988 (2003).
17. Ditunno, J.F., Little, J.W., Tessler, A. & Burns, A.S. Spinal shock revisited: A four-phase model. Spinal Cord 42, 383-395 (2004).
18. Leyton, A.S.F. & Sherrington, C.S. Observations on the excitable cortex of the chimpanzee, orang-utan, and gorilla. Exp. Physiol. 11, 135-222 (1917).
19. Streletz, L.J. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: cortical motor maps in acute spinal cord injury. Brain Topogr. 7, 245-250 (1995).
20. Topka, H., Cohen, L.G., Cole, R.A. & Hallett, M. Reorganization of corticospinal pathways following spinal cord injury. Neurology 41, 1276-1283 (1991).
21. Jacobs, K.M. & Donoghue, J.P. Reshaping the cortical motor map by unmasking latent intracortical connections. Science 251, 944-947 (1991).
22. Arenkiel, B.R. et al. In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2. Neuron 54, 205-218 (2007).
23. Ayling, O.G.S., Harrison, T.C., Boyd, J.D., Goroshkov, A. & Murphy, T.H. Automated light-based mapping of motor cortex by photoactivation of channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice. Nat. Methods 6, 219-224 (2009).
24. Hira, R. et al. Transcranial optogenetic stimulation for functional mapping of the motor cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 179, 258-263 (2009).
25. Kleim, J.A., Barbay, S. & Nudo, R.J. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 3321-3325 (1998).
26. Girgis, J. et al. Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery. Brain 130, 2993-3003 (2007).
27. Fouad, K. & Tetzlaff, W. Rehabilitative training and plasticity following spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 235, 91-99 (2012).
28. Schmitt, A.M. et al. Wnt-Ryk signaling mediates medial-lateral retinotectal topographic mapping. Nature 439, 31-37 (2006).
29. Nishimura, Y. et al. Time-dependent central compensatory mechanisms of finger dexterity after spinal cord injury. Science 318, 1150-1155 (2007).
30. García-Alías, G., Truong, K., Shah, P.K., Roy, R.R. & Edgerton, V.R. Plasticity of subcortical pathways promote recovery of skilled hand function in rats after corticospinal and rubrospinal tract injuries. Exp. Neurol. 266, 112-119 (2015).
31. Piecharka, D.M., Kleim, J.A. & Whishaw, I.Q. Limits on recovery in the corticospinal tract of the rat: partial lesions impair skilled reaching and the topographic representation of the forelimb in motor cortex. Brain Res. Bull. 66, 203-211 (2005).
32. Morawietz, C. & Moffat, F. Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 94, 2297-2308 (2013).
33. McKenna, J.E., Prusky, G.T. & Whishaw, I.Q. Cervical motoneuron topography reflects the proximodistal organization of muscles and movements of the rat forelimb: A retrograde carbocyanine dye analysis. J. Comp. Neurol. 419, 286-296 (2000).
34. Lee, J.K. et al. Assessing spinal axon regeneration and sprouting in Nogo-, MAG-, and OMgp-deficient mice. Neuron 66, 663-670 (2010).
35. Liang, F., Rouiller, E.M. & Wiesendanger, M. Modulation of sustained electromyographic activity by single intracortical microstimuli: comparison of two forelimb motor cortical areas of the rat. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 10, 51-61 (1993).