Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs

Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface

Volumn 19, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-260

  Hansen, Maj Britt Mosegaard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962972597     PISSN: 14727870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (300)

1. Abraham, Werner. (1991). The grammat1c1zation of the German modal particles. In:Approaches to Grammaticalization (Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, eds.), Vol. II, pp. 331-380. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
2. Aijmer, Karin. (2002). English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
3. Allerton, D.J. And A. Cruttenden. ( 1978). Syntactic, illocutionary, thematic and attitudinal factors in the intonation of adverbials. Journal of Pragmatics, 2, 155-188.
4. Andersen, Henning. (1984). Language structure and semiotic processes. ArbejdsPapirer fra lnstitut for Lingvistik ved Kbenhavns Universitet (AP!LKU) 3.
5. Anscombre, Jean-Claude. (1979). Delocutivite benvenistienne, delocutivite generalisee et performativite. Langue franaise, 42. 69-84.
6. Anscombre, Jean-Claude. ( 1985). Onomatopees, delocutivite et autres blab las. Revue Romane, 20(2), 169-207.
7. Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot. (1983). L'argumentation dans la langue. Mardaga, Brussels.
8. Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot. (1989). Argumentativity and informativity. In:From Metaphysics to Rhetoric (Michel Meyer, ed.), pp. 71-87. K1uwer, Dordrecht.
9. Aristotle. Topiques, vol. 1, books 1-4. (Jacques Brunschwig, ed., 1967). Les belles lettres 〉〉, Paris.
10. Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Translated by G.R.G. Mure, 2004 (Downloaded April 3rd, 2006, from 〈http://etext.library .adelaide.edu.au/a!aristotle/a8poa!〉)
11. Bach, Kent. (1999). The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 327-366.
12. Barcelona, Antonio. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In: Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective (Antonio Barcelona, ed.), pp. 31-58. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
13. Beeching, Kate. (2002). Gender, Politeness, and Pragmatic Particles in French. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
14. Benveniste, Emile. ( 1966[ 1958]). Les verbes delocutifs. In his: Problemes de linguistique generale, Vol. 1, pp. 277-285. Gallimard, Paris.
15. Biber, Douglas. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Blakemore, Diane. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Blackwell, Oxford.
17. Blakemore, Diane. (1988). The organization of discourse. In: Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey (Frederick Newmeyer, ed.), vol. IV, pp. 229-250. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Blank, Andreas. (1997). Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Max Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
19. Bolinger, Dwight. (1972). Degree Words. Mouton, The Hague.
20. Breal, Michel. (1897). Essai de sbnantique. Paris, Hachette.
21. Brinton, Laurel J. And Elizabeth Closs Traugott. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Brown, Gillian and George Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Brown, R. And A. Gilman. (1972). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: Language and Social Context (P. P. Giglioli, ed.), pp. 252-282. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
25. Buchi, Eva. (Forthcoming). Approche diachronique de Ia (poly)pragmaticalisation de fr. Deja (Quand le grammeme est-il devenu pragmateme, deja?〉〉). In: Actes du XX!Ve Congres international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (David Trotter, ed.). Max Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
26. Bybee, Joan L. (1988). Semantic substance vs contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 247-264.
27. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago University Press. Chicago, IL.
28. Campbell, Lyle. (2001). What's wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences, 23, 113-161.
29. Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. (1997). On an alleged connection between indirect speech and the theory of meaning. Mind and Language, 12(3/4), 278-296.
30. Carston, Robyn. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. Blackwell, Oxford.
31. Chafe, Wallace L. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In: Literacy, Language, and Learning (David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance and Angela Hildyard, eds.), pp. 105-123. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Chomsky, Noam. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague.
33. Chomsky, Noam. (1995). Language and nature. Mind, 104, l-61.
34. Clark, Eve V. (1992). Conventionality and contrast: pragmatic principles with lexical consequences. In: Frames, Fields, and Contrasts. New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization (Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Feder Kittay, eds.), 171-188. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
35. Clark, Eve V. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Comrie, Bernard. ( 1976). Aspect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Coseriu, Eugenio. ( 1973[ 1957]). Sincron(a, diacronia e historia. El problema del cambio lingiiistico. Editorial Gredos, Madrid. (First published in Revista de la Faculdad de Humanidades y Ciencias, 15, 201-335.)
38. Craig, Colette. (1991). Ways to go in Rama: a case study in polygrammaticalization. In:Approaches to Grammaticalization (Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine. Eds.), vol. II, pp. 455-492. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
39. Croft, William. (2000). Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London, Longman.
40. Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Cruse, D.A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Culioli, Antoine. (1990). Pour une linguistique de l'enonciation, Vol. I. Ophrys, Paris.
43. Darmesteter, Arsene. (1937). La vie des mots etudies dans leurs significations. Delagrave, Paris.
44. Deledalle, Gerard. ( 1979). Theorie et pratique du signe. Introduction a la semiotique de Charles S. Peirce. Payot, Paris.
45. Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit. (2002). Grammaticalization vs reanalysis: a semanticpragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft, 21(2), 151-195.
46. Diewald, Gabriele. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In:New Reflections on Grammaticalization (Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald, eds.), pp. 103-120. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
47. Dik, Simon C., Kees Hengeveld, Elseline Vester and Co Vet. (1990). The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of adverbial satellites. In: Layers and Levels ofRepresentation in Language Theory (Jan Nuyts, A. Machtelt Bolkestein and Co Vet, eds.). Pp. 25-70. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
48. Dinesen, Anne Marie. (1991). C.S. Peirce-fcenomenologi, semiotik og logik. Nordisk Sommeruniversitet, Aalborg.
49. Doherty, Monika. (1973). Noch and schon and their presuppositions. In: Generative Grammar in Europe (Ferenc Kiefer and Nicolas Ruwet, eds.), pp. 154-177. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
50. Dostie, Gaetane. (2004). Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs. Analyse semantique et traitement lexicographique. De Boeck/Duculot, Brussels.
51. Ducrot, Oswald. ( 1970). Peu et un peu. Cahiers de lexicologie, XV1(1), 21-52.
52. Ducrot, Oswald. (1973). Les echelles argumentatives. In his: La preuve et le dire, pp. 225-285. Marne, Paris.
53. Ducrot, Oswald. ( 1980). Analyses pragmatiques. Communications, 32, 11-60.
54. Ducrot, Oswald. (1983). Puisque: essai de description polyphonique. In: Analyses grammaticales du franais. Etudes publiees a/'occasion du 50e anniversaire de Carl Vikner (Michael Herslund, Ole M0rdrup and Finn S(Jrensen, eds.), pp. 166-185. (Etudes romanes 24). Akadernisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
55. Ducrot, Oswald. (1984). Le dire et le dit. Editions de Minuit, Paris.
56. Ducrot, Oswald. (1991[1972]). Dire et ne pas dire. Hermann, Paris.
57. Ducrot, Oswald et al. (1980). Les mots du discours. Editions de Minuit, Paris.
58. Eckardt, Regine. (2003). The Structure (}f Change. Meaning Change under Reanalysis. Habilitation-thesis. Humboldt Universitat, Berlin. (Revised version published in 2006 by Oxford University Press, Oxford)
59. Enfield, Nick. 2003). Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. Routledge/Curzon, London.
60. Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas. (1993). Pragmaticalization: the case of ba' and you know. Studier i modem sprakvetenskap, 10, 76-93.
61. Fasold, Ralph. (1984). The Sociolinguistics of Society. Blackwell, Oxford.
62. Fauconnier, Gilles. (1975). Polarity and the scale principle. Proceedings of the I 7'" Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 188-199.
63. Fauconnier, Gilles. (1984). Espaces mentaux. Editions de Minuit, Paris.
64. Fillmore, Charles J. (1982). Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in the Morning Calm (Linguistic Society of Korea, ed. ), pp. 111-137. Han shin, Seoul.
65. Fillmore, Charles J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica, V1(2), 222-254.
66. Foolen, Ad. (1993). De betekenis van partikels. Doctoral thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
67. Franckel, Jean-Jacques. ( 1989). Etude de quelques marqueurs aspectuels du fram;ais. Droz, Geneva.
68. Fraser, Bmce. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6(2), 167-190.
69. Fuchs, Catherine. (1988). Encore, dej(1, toujours: de !'aspect a Ia modalite. In: Temps et aspects (Nicole Tersis & Alain Kim, eds.), pp. 135-148. Peeters/SELAF, Paris.
70. Garfinkel, Harold. (1984[1967]). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge.
71. Geeraerts, Dirk. (1993). Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(3). 223-272.
72. Geeraerts, Dirk. (1997). Diachronic Prototype Semantics. A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Clarendon, Oxford.
73. Geis, Michael L. And Arnold M. Zwicky. (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, Il(4), 561-566.
74. Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
75. Greenbaum, Sidney. (1969). Studies in English Adverbial Usage. Longman, London.
76. Greenbaum, Sidney. (1976). Contextual influence on acceptability judgements. Linguistics, 187, 5-11.
77. Grevisse, Maurice. (1988). Lebon usage, 12'11 ed. Revised by Andre Goosse. Duculot, Paris.
78. Grice, H. Paul. (1974). Meaning. In: Semantics (D.D. Steinberg & L.A. Jakobovits, eds.), pp. 53-59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
79. Grice, Paul. (1989a[l975]). Logic and conversation. In his Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 22-40.
80. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (First published in Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, pp. 41-58. Academic Press, New York, NY.)
81. Grice, Paul. (1989b). Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. In his Studies in the Way of Words. Pp. 117-137. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
82. Groupe A.-I. (1975). Car, parce que, puisque. Revue Romane, X(2), 248-280.
83. Guimier, Claude. (1998). Pourquoi peut-on dire Heureusement que Pierre est parti, mais pas Malheureusement que Pierre est parti? Revue de semantique et pragmatique, 3, 161-176.
84. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274-307.
85. Giinthner, Susanne. (1996). From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions. Pragmatics, 6(3), 323-356.
86. Hansen, Anita Berit. (1998). Les voyelles nasales du franr,:ais parisien moderne. Aspects linguistiques, sociolinguistiques et perceptuels des changements en cours. Museum Tusculanum, Copenhagen.
87. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (1998a). The Function of" Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
88. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (1998b). La grammaticalisation de !'interaction, ou, Pour nne approche polysemique de l'adverbe bien. Revue de semantique et pragmatique, 4, 111-138.
89. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (1998c). The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua, 104, 235-260.
90. Hansen. Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (2000). The syntactic and semiotic status of direct quotes, with reference to French. Transactions of the Philological Society, 98(2), 281-322.
91. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (2002). From aspectuality to discourse marking: the case ofFrench deja and encore. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 16,23-51.
92. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (2005a). A comparative study of the semantics and pragmatics of elfin andfinalement, in synchrony and diachrony. Journal of French Language Studies, 15(2), 153-171.
93. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (2005b). From prepositional phrase to hesitation marker: the semantic and pragmatic evolution of French enfin. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 6(1). 37-68.
94. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (2005c). La polysemie de l'adverbe toujours. Travaux: de linguistique, 49, 39-55.
95. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (2006). A dynamic polysemy approach to the lexical semantics of discourse markers (with an exemplary analysis of French toujours). In: Approaches to Discourse Particles (Kerstin Fischer, ed.), pp. 21-41. Elsevier, Oxford. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. (Submitted). On the availability of "literal" meaning: evidence from courtroom interaction.
96. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Corinne Rossari. (2005). The evolution of pragmatic markers. Introduction. Journal o.fHistorical Pragmatics, 6(2), 177-187.
97. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Erling Strudsholm. (2008). The semantics of particles:advantages of a contrastive and panchronic approach. A study of the polysemy of French deja and Italian gia. Linguistics. 46(3).
98. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Richard Waltereit. (2006). GCI theory and language change. Acta Lingvistica Hafniensia, 38, 235-268.
99. Harder, Peter. (1996). Functional Semantics. A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
100. Harder, Peter and Ole Togeby. (1993). Pragmatics, cognitive science and connectionism. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 119-140.
101. Harris, Alice C. And Lyle Campbell. (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
102. Harris, Roy. (1987). Reading Saussure. A Critical Commentary on the "Cours de linguistique generale ". Duckworth, London.
103. Haspelmath, Martin. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In: The New Psychology of Language. Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (Michael Tomasello, ed.), vol. 2, pp. 211-242. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
104. Heim, Irene. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D.-thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
105. Heine, Bernd. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In: New Reflections onGrammaticalization (lise Wischer and Gabriele Diewald, eds.), pp. 83-101. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
106. Heine, Bernd, U1rike Claudi and Friederike Hi.innemeyer. (1991). Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
107. Hentschel, Elke and Harald Weydt. (2002). Die Wortart 'Partikel'. In: Lexikologie. Lexicology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wortern und Wortschatzen. An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies (D.A. Cruse eta!., ed.), pp. 646-653. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
108. Heritage, John. (1984). Gaifinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge.
109. Herslund, Michael and Hanne Korzen. (1999). Det franske sprag, vol. VIII.i. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg.
110. Herweg, Michael. (1992). A critical examination of two classical approaches to aspect. Journal of Semantics, 8, 363-402.
111. Hirschberg, Julia. (1991). A Theory of Scalar Implicature. Garland, New York, NY.
112. Hoepelman, J. And C. Rohrer. (1980). Deja et encore et les temps du passe du fran〈;:ais. In: La notion d'aspect (J. David and R. Martin, eds.), pp. 119-143. Centre d'analyse syntaxique, Universite de Metz, Metz.
113. Hookway, Christopher. (1985). Peirce. Routledge, London.
114. Hopper, Paul J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In: Approaches to Grammaticalization (Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, eds.), vol. 1, pp. 17-35. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
115. Hopper, Paul J. And Sandra A. Thompson. (1984). The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language, 60(4), 703-752.
116. Hopper, Paul J. And Elizabeth Closs Traugott. ( 1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
117. Horn, Laurence R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
118. Hymes, Dell. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In: Directions in Sociolinguistics (John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, eds.), pp. 35-71. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY.
119. Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. (1995). The historical perspective in pragmatics. In:Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History rf English (Andreas H. Jucker, ed.), pp. 3-33. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
120. Jakobson, Roman. (1966[ 1936]). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In: Readings in Linguistics (Eric P. Hamp, Fred W. Householder and Robert Austerlitz, eds.), vol. II, pp. 51-89. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
121. Jayez, Jacques and Corinne Rossari. (2004). Parentheticals as conventional implicatures. In:Handbook of French Semantics (Francis Corblin & Henriette de Swart, eds.), pp. 211-229. CSLI, Stanford, CA.
122. Jones, Michael Allan. (1996). Foundations of French Syntax. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
123. Jucker, Andreas H. And Irma Taavitsainen. (2003). Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. In: Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems (Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker, eds.), pp. 1-25. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.
124. Kadmon, Nirit. (2001 ). Formal Pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford.
125. Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer. Dordrecht.
126. Kay, Paul. (I 990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59-111.
127. Keller, Rudi. (1994[19901). On Language Change. The Invisible Hand in Language. Routledge, London.
128. Kleiber, Georges. (1987). Du cote de la rejerence verhale. Les phrases habituelles. Peter Lang, Bern.
129. Kleiber, Georges. ( 1990). La semantique du prototype. Presses universitaires de France, Paris.
130. Klein, Wolfgang. (1992). The present perfect puzzle. Language, 68(3), 525-552.
131. Koch, Peter. (199 1 ). Semantische Valenz, Polysemie und Bedeutungswandel bei romanischen Verben. Ln: Connexiones romanicae. Dependenz und Valenz in romanischen Sprachen (Peter Koch & Thomas Krefeld, eds.), pp. 279-306. Max Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
132. Koch, Peter. (1996). La semantique du prototype: semasiologie ou onomasiologie? Zeitschrift fiirfranzosische Sprache und Literatur, CVI(3), 223-240.
133. Koch, Peter. (1999). Frame and contiguity. On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In: Metonymy in Language and Thought (Kiaus-Uwe Panther and Giinter Radden, eds.), pp. 139-167. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
134. Koch, Peter. (2001). Metonymy: unity in diversity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2, 201-244.
135. Koch, Peter. (2004). Metonymy between pragmatics, reference, and diachrony. Metaphorik.de, 7, 6-54. 〈 www.metaphorik.de 〉
136. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher. (1990). Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania:Franzosisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. Max Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
137. Kortmann, Bernd. (1991). The triad "tense-aspect-Aktionsart". Problems and possible solutions. Belgian .Journal (?f Linguistics, 6, 9-30.
138. Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlsson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link and Gennaro Chierchia. (1995). Genericity: an introduction. In: The Generic Book (Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, eds.), pp. 1-124. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
139. Kroon, Caroline and Rodie Risselada. (2002). Phasality, polarity, focality: a feature analysis of the Latin particle IAM. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 16, 65-78.
140. Kurylowicz, Jerzy. (1975[1965]). The evolution of grammatical categories. In his Esquisses linguistiques, vol. II, pp. 38-54. Wilhelm Fink, Munich.
141. Konig, Ekkehard. (1977). Temporal and non-temporal uses of noch and schon in German. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 173-198.
142. Konig, Ekkehard. (1988). Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In: Explaining Language Universals (John A. Hawkins, ed.), pp. 145-166. Blackwell, Oxford.
143. Konig, Ekkehard. (1991). The Meaning of Focus Particles. Routledge, London.
144. Konig, Ekkehard and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. (1982). Divergence and apparent convergence in the development of yet and still. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 8, 170-179.
145. Labov, William. (1975). Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In: The Scope ofAmerican Linguistics (Robert Austerlitz, ed.), pp. 77-133. Peter de Ridder, Lisse.
146. Lakoff, George. (1970). A note on vagueness and ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 357-359.
147. Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
148. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University ofChicago Press, Chicago, TL.
149. Langacker, Ronald W. (1977). Syntactic reanalysis. In: Mechanisms C?f Syntactic Change (Charles N. Li, ed.), pp. 57-139. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
150. Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
151. Langacker, Ronald W. ( 1991 ). Subjectification. In his Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 315-342. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
152. Lehmann, Christian. (1985). Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Linguae stile, XX(3), 303-318.
153. Lehrer, Adrienne J. (2002). Paradigmatic relations of exclusion and opposition I: Gradable antonymy and complementarity. In: Handbook of Lexicology (D.A.Cruse, F.
154. Hundsnurscher, M. Job and P. Lutzeier, eds.), pp. 498-507. De Gruyter, Berlin.
155. Levelt, Willem J.M. (1989). Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
156. Levelt, W.J.M., J.A.W.M van Gent, A.F.J. Haans and A.J.A. Meijers. (1977). Grammaticality, paraphrase and imagery. In: Acceptability in Language (Sidney Greenbaum, ed.), pp. 87-101. Mouton: The Hague.
157. Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
158. Levinson, Stephen C. (1995). Three levels of meaning. In: Grammar and Meaning (F.R. Palmer, ed.), pp. 90-115. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
159. Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
160. Lewis. David. ( 1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Language, 8, 339-359.
161. Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics, Vols. 1-2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
162. Lyons, John. (1995). Linguistic Semantics. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
163. Li:ibner, Sebastian. (1989). German schon-erst-noch: an integrated analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 167-212.
164. Li:ibner, Sebastian. (1999). Why noch and schon are still duals: a reply to van der Auwera. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 45-107.
165. Martin, Robert. (1974). La notion d'"adverbe de phrase": essai d'interpretation en grammaire generative. In: Actes du Colloque franco-allemand de grammaire transformationnelle. II:Etudes de semantiques et mttres (Christian Rohrer and Nicolas Ruwet, eds.), pp. 66-75. Max Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
166. Martin, Robert. (1980). Deja et encore: de Ia presupposition a !'aspect. In: La notion d'aspect (J. David and R. Martin, eds.), pp. 167-180. Centre d'analyse syntaxique, Universite de Metz, Metz.
167. Meillet, Antoine. (1921). L'evolution des formes grammaticales. In his Linguistique historique et linguistique generale, pp. 130-148. Honore Champion, Paris.
168. Meillet, Antoine. ( 1964[1922]). Introduction a l 'etude comparative des langues indoeuropeennes. University of Alabama Press, University, AL.
169. Meillet, Antoine. (1975[1905-06]). Comment Jes mots changent de sens. In his Linguistique historique et linguistique generale, pp. 230-271. Honore Champion, Paris.
170. Michaelis, Laura A. (1992). Aspect and the semantics-pragmatics interface: the case ofalready. Lingua, 87, 321-339.
171. Michaelis, Laura A. (1993). "Continuity" within three scalar models. The polysemy ofadverbial still. Journal of Semantics, 10, 193-237.
172. Michaelis, Laura A. ( 1996). On the use and meaning of already. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19,477-502.
173. Michaelis, Laura A. (1998). Aspectual Grammar and Past-Time Reference. Routledge, London.
174. Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Blackwell, Oxford.
175. Mittwoch, Anita. (1993). The relationship between schon/already and noch/still: a reply to Li:ibner. Natural Language Semantics, 2, 71-82.
176. Moens, Marc and Mark Steedman. (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics. 14(2), 15-28.
177. Morel, Mary-Annick. (1996). La concession enfranr;ais. Ophrys, Paris.
178. Morgan, Jerry L. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In: Syntax and Semantics (Peter Cole, ed.), vol. 9, pp. 261-280. Academic Press: New York.
179. Muller, Claude. (1975). Remarques syntactico-semantiques sur certains adverbes de temps. Le franr;ais moderne, 43, 12-38.
180. Muller. Claude. (1999). Encore et toujours les modifieurs aspectuels: de encore a toujours. In: L'emprise du sens. Structures linguistiques et interpretations (M. Plenat, M. Aurnague, A. Condamines, J.-P. Maurel, Ch. Molinier and Cl. Muller, eds.), pp. 217-237. Rodopi, Amsterdam.
181. Murphy, M. Lynne. (1997). Afrikaans, American and British models for South African English lexicography: racial label usage. Lexikos, 7, 153-164.
182. Murphy, M. Lynne. (2003). Semantic Relations and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
183. Nemo, Franc;ois. (2000). Enfin, encore, toujours entre indexicalite et emplois. In: Actes du XXIIe Congres de li1:guistique et philologies romanes (Annick Englebert, Michel Pierrard, Laurence Rosier and Dan Van Raemdonck, eds.), Vol. VII, pp. 499-511. Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
184. Nemo, Franc;ois. (2006). Discourse particles as morphemes and constructions. In:Approaches to discourse particles (Kerstin Fischer, ed.), pp. 375-402. Elsevier, Oxford.
185. Nerlich, Brigitte and David D. Clarke. (1992). Outline of a model of semantic change. In:Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition (Gunter Kellerman & Michael D. Morrissey, eds.), pp. 125-141. Peter Lang, Frankfurt-am-Main.
186. Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1998). Language Form and Language Function. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
187. Nguyen, Thanh-Binh. (1986). Toujours est-il. Revue Romane, 21(2), 192-207.
188. Nguyen, Thanh-Binh. (1988). Toujours en position finale: emploi pragmatique particulier. Revue Romane, 23(1), 36-46.
189. Nunberg, Geoffrey D. (1978). The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
190. Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag and Thomas Wasow. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491-538.
191. Nyrop, Kristoffer. (1913). Grammaire historique de Ia langue franaise, Vol. IV. Nordisk forlag, Copenhagen.
192. N0lke, Henning. (1983). Les adverbes paradigmatisants. Fonction et analyses. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
193. N0lke, Henning. (1985). Le subjonctif. Fragments d'une theorie enonciative. Langages, 80, 55-70.
194. Noike, Henning. (1990). Les adverbiaux contextuels: problemes de classification. Langue franaise, 88, 12-27.
195. N0lke, Henning, Kjersti Fl0ttum and Coco Noren. (2004). ScaPoLine. La theorie scandinave de Ia polyphonie linguistique. Kime, Paris. Paillard, Denis. (n.d.). Deja: adverbe ou marqueur discursif? Ms.
196. Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Linda L. Thornburg. (2003). Introduction. On the nature ofconceptual metonymy. In: Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg, eds.), pp. 1-20. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
197. Partee, Barbara H. (1984). Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 243-286.
198. Pedersen, John, Ebbe Spang-Hanssen and Carl Vikner. (1980). Fransk grammatik. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
199. Peirce, Charles Sanders. (1931-35). Collected Papers, (Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss, eds.), Vols. 1-6. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
200. Peirce, Charles Sanders. (1958). Collected Papers (Arthur W. Burkes, ed.), Vols. 7-8. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
201. Pons Borderfa, Salvador. (1998). Conexi6n y conectores. Estudio de su relaci6n en el registro informal de la lengua. (Cuadernos de filologia, supplement no. XXVII). Universitat de Valencia, Valencia.
202. Pons Borderfa, Salvador. (2006). From pragmatics to semantics: esto es in formulaic expressions. Acta Lingvistica Hafniensia, 38, 180-206.
203. Prevost, Sophie, Serge Heiden and Celine Guillot. (2000). Base de fran〈;ais medieval:presentation generale et outils d'exploitation. Ms.
204. Quine, Willard Van Orman. (1960). Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
205. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman, London.
206. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London.
207. Radden, Gunter. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In: Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Per.1pective (Antonio Barcelona, ed.), pp. 93-108. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
208. Ramat, Paolo and Davide Ricca. (1994). Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality ofthe notion of ADVERB. Rivista di linguistica, 6(2), 289-326.
209. Ramat, Paolo and Davide Ricca. ( 1998). Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In:Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe (Johan van der Auwera and Donal! P. 6 Baoill, eds.), pp. 187-275. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
210. Recanati, Fran〈;ois. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
211. Reichenbach, Hans. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. Free Press, New York, NY.
212. Riemer, Nick. (2005). The Semantics of Polysemy. Reading Meaning in English and Warlpiri. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
213. Rosch, Eleanor. ( 1977). Human categorization. In: Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology (Neil Warren, ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 1-49. Academic Press, London.
214. Rossari, Corinne. (2000). Connecteurs et relations de discours: des liens entre cognition et signification. Presses universitaires de Nancy, Nancy.
215. Roulet, Eddy. (1987). Completude interactive et connecteurs reformulatifs. Cahiers de linguistique franqaise, 8, 111-140.
216. Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R.L. Petruck and Christopher R. Johnson. (2005). FrameNet: Theory and Practice. Downloaded from 〈http://framenet.icsi. Berkeley .edul〉.
217. Sacks, Harvey. (1995). Lectures on Conversation, Vol. II. Blackwell, Oxford.
218. Sandra, Dominiek and Sally Rice. ( 1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning:mirroring whose mind-the linguist's or the language user's? Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89-130. De Saussure, Ferdinand. (1972[1916]). Cours de linguistique genera/e. Payot, Paris.
219. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1978). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In:Current Trends in Text Linguistics (Wolfgang U. Dressler, ed.), pp. 81-102. De Gruyter, Berlin.
220. Schelling. Marianne. (1982). Quelques modalites de cloture, les conclusifs finalement, en somme, au fond, de toute faqon. Cahiers de linguistique franqaise, 4, 63-105.
221. Schiitze, Carson T. (1996). The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
222. Schwenter, Scott and Richard Waltereit. (2005). Presupposition accommodation and language change: From additivity to speech-act marking. Paper presented at the FITIGRA conference, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, February 10-12.
223. Searle, John R. (1976). A classification ofillocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, l-23.
224. Smith, Carlota S. (1991 ). The Parameter of Aspect. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
225. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. (1986). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.
226. Stem, Gustaf. ( 1932). Meaning and Change of Meaning. (Goteborgs Hogskolas arsskrift XXXVIII(l)). Elanders Boktryckeri, Gothenburg.
227. de Swart, Henriette Elisabeth. (1991). Adverbs of Quantification: a Generalized Quantifier Approach. Ph.D.-thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen.
228. de Swart, Henriette. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347-385.
229. Sweetser, Eve E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
230. Tabor, Whitney and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. ( 1998). Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In: The Limits of Grammaticalization (Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paul J. Hopper, eds.), pp. 229-272. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
231. Timberlake, Alan. (1977). Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In: Mechanisms of Syntactic Change (Charles N. Li, ed.), pp. 141-177. University of Texas Press, Austin.
232. Togeby, Knud. (1974). Precis historique de grammaire franf;aise. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
233. Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Scott A. Schwenter. (Forthcoming). Towards an operational notion of subjectification. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31.
234. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. ( 1986). From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 12, 539-550.
235. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. ( 1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ({the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14,406-416.
236. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65(1), 31-55.
237. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1990). From less to more situated in language: the unidirectionality of semantic change. In: Papers from the 51" International Conference onEnglish Historical Linguistics (Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent and Susan Wright, eds.), pp. 497-517. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
238. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1999). From subjectification to intersubjectification. Paper presented at the Workshop on Historical Pragmatics, XIV International Conference onHistorical Linguistics. Vancouver, August.
239. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (2004). Historical pragmatics. In: Handbook of Pragmatics (Laurence R. Hom and Gregory Ward, eds.), pp. 538-561. Blackwell, Oxford.
240. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
241. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Bernd Heine. (1991 ). Introduction. In: Approaches to Grammaticalization (Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, eds. ), Vol. I, pp. 1-14. John Benjarnins, Amsterdam.
242. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and John Waterhouse. (1969). Already and yet: a suppletive set ofaspect-markers? Journal of Linguistics, 5, 287-304.
243. Trier, Jost. (1973[1931]). Uber Wort-und Begriffsfe1der. In his: Aufvdtze und Vortrdge zur Wortfeldtheorie (Anthony van der Lee and Oskar Reichmann, eds.), pp. 40-65. Mouton, The Hague.
244. Tugendhat, Ernst and Ursula Wolf. (1983). Logisch-semantische Propddeutik. Philipp Reclam, Stuttgart.
245. Tuggy, David. ( 1993). Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(3), 273-290.
246. Tyler, Andrea and Vyvyan Evans. (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks:the case of over. Language, 77(4), 724-765.
247. Ullmann, Stephen. (1957). The Principles of Semantics, 2"d ed. Blackwell, Oxford.
248. Valikangas, Olli. (1982). La notion de deja et 1es mots qui servent ala rendre dans quelques langues europeennes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, LXXXIII, 371-404.
249. Valikangas, Olli. (1985). La naissance de l'adverbe deja. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, LXXXVI, 78-88.
250. van Baar, Tim. (1990). The Dutch Perspectivity Particles in FG. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 36.
251. van Baar, Tim. (1997). Phasal Polarity. IFOTT, Amsterdam.
252. Vandeloise, Claude. (1990). Representation, prototypes, and centrality. In: Meanings and Prototypes (S.L. Tsohatzidis, ed.), pp. 403-437. Routledge, London.
253. van der Auwera, Johan. (1993). Already and still: beyond duality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 613-653.
254. van der Auwera, Johan. (1998). Phasal adverbs in the languages of Europe. In: Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe (Johan van der Auwera and D. P. 6 BaoilL eds.), pp. 25-145. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
255. Vandeweghe, Willy. (1978). Over de semantiek van het partikel al (=reeds). De Nieuwe Taalgids, 71, 193-205.
256. Vandeweghe, Willy. (1992). Perspectivische evaluatie in het nederlands. De partikels van de AUNOG/PAS-groep. Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlanse Taal-en Letterkunde, Gent.
257. van Dijk, Teun A. (1979). Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 447-456.
258. Vendler, Zeno. (1968). Verbs and times. In his Linguistics in Philosophy, pp. 97-121. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
259. Vet, Co. (1980). Temps, aspect et adverbes de temps en franr;:ais contemporain. Droz, Geneva.
260. Victorri, Bernard and Catherine Fuchs. (1992). Construire un espace semantique pour representer Ia polysernie d'un marqueur grammatical: l'exemple de encore. Lingvisticae lnvestigationes, 16(1), 125-153.
261. Visconti, Jacqueline. (2004). Review of Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Richard B. Dasher, "Regularity in semantic change". Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 821-826.
262. Visconti, Jacqueline. (2005). On the origins of scalar particles in Italian. Journal ofHistorical Pragmatics, 6(2), 237-261.
263. Visconti, Jacqueline. (2006). The role of lexical semantics in semantic change. Acta Lingvistica Hafniensia, 38, 207-234.
264. de Vogue, Sarah. (1992). Aux frontieres des domaines notionnels: Bien que, quoique et encore que. L'il!formation grammaticale, 55, 23-27.
265. Waltereit, Richard. (1998). Metonymie und Grammatik. Kontiguitdtsphdnomene in der franzosischen Satzsemantik. Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
266. Waltereit, Richard. (2001). Modal particles and their functional equivalents: a speech-acttheoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1391-1417.
267. Waltereit, Richard. (2002a). AbtOnung. Eine pragmatische Kategorie, dargelegt am Beispiel romanischer Sprachen. Habilitation-thesis. Eberhard-Karls-Universitat, Tuebingen. (Revised version published in 2006 by Niemeyer. Tuebingen)
268. Waltereit, Richard. (2002b). Imperatives, interruption in conversation, and the rise ofdiscourse markers: a study of Italian guarda. Linguistics, 40(5), 987-1010.
269. Waltereit, Richard. (2006). The rise of discourse particles. A specific type of language change. In: Approaches to Discourse Particles (Kerstin Fischer, ed.), pp. 61-76. Elsevier, Oxford.
270. Waltereit, Richard. (Forthcoming). Evolution diachronique des marqueurs discursifs et des modalisateurs-points en commun et divergences. In: Actes du XX!Ve Congres international de linguistique et de philologie romane (David Trotter, ed.). Niemeyer, Tuebingen.
271. Waltereit, Richard and Ulrich Detges. (Forthcoming). Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal ofLinguistics.
272. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin I. Herzog. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In: Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium (Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, eds.), pp. 97-195. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
273. Weydt, Harald. (1969). Abtiinungspartikel. Gehlen, Bad Homburg.
274. Whittaker, Sunniva. (2002). La notion de gradation. Applications aux adject!fs. Peter Lang, Bern.
275. Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3-25.
276. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. ( 1971 [ 1958]). Filosojiske undersgelser. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. DATA SouRcEs d'
277. Arras Gautier. 1976 [ca. 1176-1184] Arras, Gautier. (1976[ca. 1176-1184]). Eracle (Guy Renaud de Lage. Ed.). Paris. (Brian Wo1edge, ed.). 1936[mid-13'hcent.]). Champion, Paris. Champion L'Atre Perilleu.x
278. Base defralll;ais medieval searchable internet data base: 〈http://bfm.ens-lsh.fr〉 Base de fran{:ais medieval, Concordances. 2000 CD-ROM.
279. Bardot, Brigitte. (1996). Initiates B.B. Livre de poche, Paris.
280. de Beaumanoir, Philippe. (1899[1283]). Coutumes de Beauvaisis (Am. Salmon, ed.), Vol. 1. Alphonse Picard et Fils, Paris.
281. Beroul. (1957[1180]). Tristan (Ernest Muret, ed.). Honore Champion, Paris. La chanson de Roland (Gerard Moignet, ed.). (1985[1080]). Bordas, Paris. Le charroi de Nimes (Duncan McMillan, ed.). (1972[mid-12th cent.]). Klincksieck, Paris.
282. Chretien de Troyes. (1994[1181-85]). Perceval ou le Conte du Graal (Daniel Poirion, ed.). In: Chretien de Troyes. CEuvres completes (Daniel Poirion et a!., eds.). Bibliotheque de Ia Plelade, Paris.
283. Chretien de Troyes. (1994[ca. 1177-81]). Yvain ou le Chevalier au lion. (Karl D. Uitti, ed.; annotated by Philippe Walter). In: Chretien de Troyes. CEuvres completes (Daniel Poirion et al., ed.) Bibliotheque de Ia Ple!ade, Paris.
284. de Clari, Robert. (1956[ca. 1200]). La Conquete de Constantinople (Philippe Lauer, ed.). Honore Champion, Paris. Le couronnement de Louis (Ernest Langlois, ed.). (1961 [ca. 1150]). Honore Champion, Paris.
285. Elicop searchable electronic corpus of spoken French: 〈http://bach.arts.kuleuven.be/elicop/〉 Fran.;;ois.
286. Alexandre. 1996). Cmpus de frangais oral. (Transcribed in part by M.-B. Mosegaard Hansen.) University of Paris III-Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris. (= Fran.;;ois Frantext searchable internet data base: 〈http://atilf.atilf.fr/frantext.htm〉
287. Coogle search engine: 〈http://www.google.fr〉 Hansen, Anita Berit. 1989). Corpus 2F + copine. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
288. (= 2F + copine)Joinville, Jean Sire de. (1874[1298-1309]). Histoire de Saint Louis. Credo et Lettre a Louis X, (Natalis de Wailly, ed.). Firmin Didot Freres, Fils et Co, Paris.
289. Maistre Pierre Pathelin. Farce du XVe siecle (RichardT. Holbrook ed.). 1924[1456-69]). Champion, Paris. Marie-Claire, women's monthly magazine, French edition. La Mort le Roi Artu (Jean Frappier, ed.). 1954[ca. 1230]). Droz, Geneva. Le Nouvel Observateur, weekly French news magazine.
290. Pennac, Daniel. (1996). Monsieur Malaussene. Editions Folio, Paris. La Queste del Saint Graal (Albert Pauphilet, ed.). (1967[ca. 1220]). Champion, Paris.
291. La Queste del Saint Graal-ms K (Christiane Marchello-Nizia, ed.). 2002[ca. 1220]).
292. 〈http://weblex.ens-lsh.fr/pub/kq/kq-ms-trans/kq-ms trans-f-l60ra. Html〉
293. Rabelais. Fran.;;ois. (1962[1546]). Le tiers livre. In his CEuvres completes (Pierre Jourda, ed.), Vol. I. Classiques Garnier, Paris.
294. Reboul, Anne & Jacques Moeschler. (1998). Pragmatique du discours. Armand Colin, Paris.
295. Renart, Jean. (l970[ca. 1210]). Le Roman de la rose ou de Guillaume de Dole (Felix Lecoy, ed.). Honore Champion, Paris.
296. Reumaux, Melanie. (1995). Corpus Reumaux. Universite de Ia Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris III, Paris. (= Reumaux)Le Roman de Thebes (Guy Renaud de Lage, ed.), Vols. I-II. (l966-1967[ca. 1150]). Champion, Paris.
297. Le Roman de Tristan en prose (Philippe Menard, ed.), Vol. I. (l987[13'h cent.]). Droz, Geneva.
298. Thevenon, Emmanuel. (1984). Transcription de deux debats radiophoniques. Universite de Ia Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris III, Paris. (= VS I & VS2)
299. Tobler, Adolf & Erhard Lommatzsch. (1954). Altfranzosisches Worterbuch, Vol. 3. Franz Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden.
300. Tresor de la languefranaise (Paul Imbs, dir. 6. 1978). Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris. Tresor de Ia languefrangaise (Paul Imbs, dir.), Vol. 7. 1979). Editions du Centre national de Ia recherche scientifique, Paris. La vie de Saint Alexis (Christopher Storey, ed.). (1968[ca. 1050]). Droz, Geneva.