No Difference in Dislocation Seen in Anterior Vs Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 127-130

  Maratt, Joseph D ^a   Gagnier, Joel J ^a   Butler, Paul D ^b   Hallstrom, Brian R ^a,c   Urquhart, Andrew G ^a   Roberts, Karl C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Grand Rapids Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program   (United States)

^c Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

complication; direct anterior approach; dislocation; outcome; posterior approach; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; GENDER; HEMATOMA; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HIP REPLACEMENT; JOINT DISLOCATION; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; REGISTER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMANS; JOINT DISLOCATIONS; MALE; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84962653602     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.071     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1 Ethgen, O., Bruyère, O., Richy, F., et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A, 2004, 963.
2. 2 Khatod, M., Barber, T., Paxton, E., et al. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 447, 2006, 19.
3. 3 Palan, J., Beard, D.J., Murray, D.W., et al. Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: anterolateral or posterior?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, 2009, 473.
4. 4 Second AJRR annual report on hip and knee arthroplasty data, 2015, American Joint Replacement Registry, Rosemont, IL.
5. 5 Restrepo, C., Mortazavi, S.M.J., Brothers, J., et al. Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, 2010, 417.
6. 6 Barrett, W.P., Turner, S.E., Leopold, J.P., Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 28(9), 2013, 1634.
7. 7 Rodriguez, J.A., Deshmukh, A.J., Rathod, P.A., et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach?. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, 2013, 455.
8. 8 Sheth, D., Cafri, G., Inacio, M.C.S., et al. Anterior and anterolateral approaches for THA are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1, 2015.
9. 9 De Geest, T., Vansintjan, P., De Loore, G., Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: complications and early outcome in a series of 300 cases. Acta Orthop Belg, 79, 2013, 166.
10. 10 Goulding, K., Beaulé, P.E., Kim, P.R., et al. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 2010, 2397.
11. 11 Jewett, B.A., Collis, D.K., High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, 2010, 503.
12. 12 Spaans, A.J., van den Hout, J.A.A.M., Bolder, S.B.T., High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop, 83, 2012, 342.
13. 13 Browne, J.A., Pagnano, M.W., Surgical technique: a simple soft-tissue-only repair of the capsule and external rotators in posterior-approach THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, 2011, 511.
14. 14 Pellicci, P.M., Bostrom, M., Poss, R., Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, 224.
15. 15 Siguier, T., Siguier, M., Brumpt, B., Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, 164.
16. 16 Poehling-Monaghan, K.L., Kamath, A.F., Taunton, M.J., et al. Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473(2), 2014, 623.
17. 17 Hughes, R.E., Hallstrom, B.R., Cowen, M.E., et al. Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality initiative (MARCQI) as a model for regional registries in the United States. Orthopaedic Res Rev, 7, 2015, 47.
18. 18 Farrell, C.M., Springer, B.D., Haidukewych, G.J., et al. Motor nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, 2005, 2619.
19. 19 Woo, R.Y., Morrey, B.F., Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64, 1982, 1295.
20. 20 Amlie, E., Hovik, O., Reikerås, O., Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head. J Orthop Traumatol, 11, 2010, 111.
21. 21 Bistolfi, A., Crova, M., Rosso, F., et al. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Hip Int, 21, 2011, 559.
22. 22 Ho, K.W.K., Whitwell, G.S., Young, S.K., Reducing the rate of early primary hip dislocation by combining a change in surgical technique and an increase in femoral head diameter to 36 mm. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 132, 2012, 1031.
23. 23 Hailer, N.P., Weiss, R.J., Stark, A., et al. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthop, 83, 2012, 442.