The key role of lignin in the production of low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibres for papermaking applications

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 86, Issue , 2016, Pages 295-300

  Delgado Aguilar, Marc ^a   González, Israel ^a   Tarrés, Quim ^a   Pèlach, M Àngels ^a   Alcalà, Manel ^a   Mutjé, Pere ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofibres; Lignin; Mechanical properties; Papermaking; Stone groundwood pulp

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; COSTS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; LIGNIN; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOFIBERS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OXIDATION; PAPERMAKING; REINFORCEMENT;

CELLULOSE NANOFIBRES; CHEMICAL PULPING PROCESS; MECHANICAL TREATMENTS; PAPERMAKING APPLICATIONS; PAPERMAKING INDUSTRY; REINFORCING EFFECTS; STONE GROUNDWOOD; TEMPO-MEDIATED OXIDATION;

PULP;

BLEACHING; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CHEMICAL PROCESS; CONIFEROUS TREE; LIGNIN; MECHANICAL PROPERTY; NANOPARTICLE; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; RESEARCH METHOD;

CELLULOSE; LIGNINS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PAPER MAKING;

EID: 84962633724     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahola S., Österberg M., Laine J. Cellulose nanofibrils-adsorption with poly (amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 2008, 15:303-314.
2. Besbes I., Alila S., Boufi S. Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84:975-983.
3. Brodin F.W., Gregersen O.W., Syverud K. Cellulose nanofibrils: challenges and possibilities as a paper additive or coating material-a review. Nordic Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2014, 29:156-166.
4. Chaker A., Alila S., Mutjé P., Vilar M.R., Boufi S. Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cellulose 2013, 20:2863-2875.
5. Chinga-Carrasco G. Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: the morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6:1-7.
6. Delgado-Aguilar M., González I., Pèlach M.A., De La Fuente E., Negro C., Mutjé P. Improvement of deinked old newspaper/old magazine pulp suspensions by means of nanofibrillated cellulose addition. Cellulose 2015, 22:789-802.
7. Delgado-Aguilar M., Recas E., Puig J., Arbat G., Pereira M., Vilaseca F., Mutjé P. Aplicación de celulosa nanofibrilada, en masa y superficie, a la pulpa mecánica de muela de piedra: una sólida alternativa al tratamiento clásico de refinado. MCT 2015, 0.
8. Delgado-Aguilar M., Tarrés Q., Pelach A., Mutje P., Fullana Palmer P. Are cellulose nanofibres a solution for a more circular economy of paper products?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49:12206-12213.
9. Delgado-Aguilar M., Tarrés Q., Puig J., Boufi S., Blanco Á., Mutjé P. Enzymatic refining and cellulose nanofibre addition in papermaking processes from recycled and deinked slurries. BioResources 2015, 10:5730-5743.
10. Delgado-Aguilar M., Tovar I.G., Tarrés Q., Alcalá M., Pèlach M.À., Mutjé P. Approaching a low-cost production of cellulose nanofibres for papermaking applications. BioResources 2015, 10:5345-5355.
11. Dufresne A., Cavaille J.-Y., Vignon M.R. Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 64:1185-1194.
12. Eriksen O., Syverud K., Gregersen O. The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nordic Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2008, 23:299-304.
13. Espinosa E., Tarrés Q., Delgado-Aguilar M., González I., Mutjé P., Rodríguez A. Suitability of wheat straw semichemical pulp for the fabrication of lignocellulosic nanofibres and their application to papermaking slurries. Cellulose 2016, 23:837-852.
14. Ferrer A., Filpponen I., Rodríguez A., Laine J., Rojas O.J. Valorization of residual empty palm fruit bunch fibres (EPFBF) by microfluidization: production of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 125:249-255.
15. Ferrer A., Quintana E., Filpponen I., Solala I., Vidal T., Rodríguez A., Laine J., Rojas O.J. Effect of residual lignin and heteropolysaccharides in nanofibrillar cellulose and nanopaper from wood fibres. Cellulose 2012, 19:2179-2193.
16. González I., Boufi S., Pèlach M.A., Alcalà M., Vilaseca F., Mutjé P. Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps. BioResources 2012, 7:5167-5180.
17. González I., Vilaseca F., Alcalá M., Pèlach M., Boufi S., Mutjé P. Effect of the combination of biobeating and NFC on the physico-mechanical properties of paper. Cellulose 2013, 20:1425-1435.
18. González I., Alcalà M., Chinga-Carrasco G., Vilaseca F., Boufi S., Mutjé P. From paper to nanopaper: evolution of mechanical and physical properties. Cellulose 2014, 21:2599-2609.
19. Henriksson M., Henriksson G., Berglund L., Lindström T. An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibres. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43:3434-3441.
20. ISO302, 2004. ISO 302:2004: Pulps - Determination of Kappa number. International Organization for Standardization.
21. ISO, 2008. 1924-2: Paper and board-Determination of tensile properties-Part 2: Constant rate of elongation method (20 mm/min).
22. Khalil H.A., Davoudpour Y., Islam M.N., Mustapha A., Sudesh K., Dungani R., Jawaid M. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr. polym. 2014, 99:649-665.
23. Klemm D., Kramer F., Moritz S., Lindström T., Ankerfors M., Gray D., Dorris A. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50:5438-5466.
24. Orblin E., Fardim P. Interactions between cationic polyelectrolyte and pulp fines. BioResources 2011, 6:2340-2355.
25. Pääkkö M., Ankerfors M., Kosonen H., Nykänen A., Ahola S., Österberg M., Ruokolainen J., Laine J., Larsson P., Ikkala O. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1934-1941.
26. Rodionova G., Saito T., Lenes M., Eriksen Ø., Gregersen Ø., Kuramae R., Isogai A. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of Norway spruce and Eucalyptus pulps: preparation and characterization of nanofibres and nanofibre dispersions. J. Polym. Environ. 2013, 21:207-214.
27. Rojo E., Peresin M.S., Sampson W.W., Hoeger I.C., Vartiainen J., Laine J., Rojas O.J. A comprehensive investigation to understand the effect of residual lignin on the physical, barrier, mechanical and surface properties of nanocellulose films. Green Chem. 2015, 17:1853-1866.
28. Saito T., Kimura S., Nishiyama Y., Isogai A. Cellulose nanofibres prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:2485-2491.
29. Siró I., Plackett D., Hedenqvist M., Ankerfors M., Lindström T. Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 119:2652-2660.
30. Spence K.L., Venditti R.A., Rojas O.J., Habibi Y., Pawlak J.J. A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 2011, 18:1097-1111.
31. Taipale T., Österberg M., Nykänen A., Ruokolainen J., Laine J. Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 2010, 17:1005-1020.
32. Wågberg L., Decher G., Norgren M., Lindström T., Ankerfors M., Axnäs K. The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 2008, 24:784-795.
33. Wang W., Mozuch M.D., Sabo R.C., Kersten P., Zhu J., Jin Y. Production of cellulose nanofibrils from bleached eucalyptus fibres by hyperthermostable endoglucanase treatment and subsequent microfluidization. Cellulose 2015, 22:351-361.
34. Zhang H., Zhao C., Li Z., Li J. The fibre charge measurement depending on the poly-DADMAC accessibility to cellulose fibres. Cellulose 2015, 1-11.