"Anyone know what species this is?" - Twitter conversations as embryonic citizen science communities

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Daume, Stefan ^a,b,c   Galaz, Victor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONVERSATION; DATA MINING; EMBRYO; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONITORING; SOCIAL MEDIA; SPECIES; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PROCEDURES; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENCE; TIME FACTOR;

CLASSIFICATION; COMMUNICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SCIENCE; SOCIAL MEDIA; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84962554059     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151387     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Xu K, Li J, Song Y. Identifying valuable customers on social networking sites for profit maximization. Expert SystAppl. 2012;39:13009-13018. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.098
2. Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci. 2011;2:1-8. doi: 10. 1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007
3. Sobkowicz P, Kaschesky M, Bouchard G. Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web. Gov Inf Q. 2012;29:470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.005
4. Crooks A, Pfoser D, Jenkins A, Croitoru A, Stefanidis A, Smith D, et al. Crowdsourcing urban form and function. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. Taylor & Francis; 2015;1-22. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2014.977905
5. Vieweg S, Hughes AL, Starbird K, Palen L. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems-CHI'10. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2010. p. 1079. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753486
6. Qu Y, Huang C, Zhang P, Zhang J. Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work-CSCW'11. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2011. pp. 25-34. doi: 10.1145/1958824.1958830
7. Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y. Earthquake Shakes Twitter Users: Real-time Event Detection by Social Sensors. WWW'10 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM; 2010. pp. 851-860. doi: 10.1145/1772690.1772777
8. Crooks A, Croitoru A, Stefanidis A, Radzikowski J. Earthquake: Twitter as a Distributed Sensor System. Trans GIS. 2013;17:124-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01359.x
9. Mykhalovskiy E, Weir L. The Global Public Health Intelligence Network and early warning outbreak detection: a Canadian contribution to global public health. Can J public Heal Rev Can santé publique. 2006;97:42-4. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41994676
10. Salathé M, Bengtsson L, Bodnar TJ, Brewer DD, Brownstein JS, Buckee C, et al. Digital Epidemiology. Bourne PE, editor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002616 PMID: 22844241
11. Gomide J, Veloso A, Meira W, Almeida V, Benevenuto F, Ferraz F, et al. Dengue surveillance based on a computational model of spatio-temporal locality of Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM WebSci'11, June 14-17 2011, Koblenz, Germany. 2011. pp. 1-8. doi: 10.1145/2527031.2527049
12. De Longueville B, Smith RS, Luraschi G. "OMG, from here, I can see the flames!": a use case mining Location Based Social Networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks-LBSN'09. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2009. pp. 73-80. doi: 10.1145/1629890.1629907
13. Galaz V, Crona B, Daw T, Bodin Ö, Nyström M, Olsson P. Can web crawlers revolutionize ecological monitoring? Front Ecol Environ. Ecological Society of America; 2010;8:99-104. doi: 10.1890/070204
14. Daume S, Albert M, von Gadow K. Forest monitoring and social media-Complementary data sources for ecosystem surveillance? For Ecol Manage. 2014;316:9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.004
15. Cha Y, Stow CA. Mining web-based data to assess public response to environmental events. Environ Pollut. 2015;198:97-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.027 PMID: 25577650
16. Malcevschi S, Marchini A, Savini D, Facchinetti T. Opportunities for Web-Based Indicators in Environmental Sciences. Perc M, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042128 PMID: 22905118
17. Stafford R, Hart AG, Collins L, Kirkhope CL, Williams RL, Rees SG, et al. Eu-social science: the role of internet social networks in the collection of bee biodiversity data. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14381. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0014381 PMID: 21179423
18. Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:467-471. doi: 10.1016/j.tree. 2009.03.017 PMID: 19586682
19. Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S, Crowston K. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Front Ecol Environ. Ecological Society of America; 2012;10:298-304. doi: 10.1890/110294
20. Biggs R, Carpenter SR, Brock WA. Turning back from the brink: detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:826-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811729106 PMID: 19124774
21. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 2007;12. Available: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art11/
22. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horiz. 2010;53:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
23. Smith A, Brenner J. Twitter Use 2012. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. [Internet]. 2012. Available: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Twitter-Use-2012.aspx
24. Wiggins A, Newman G, Stevenson RD, Crowston K. Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science. 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops. IEEE; 2011. pp. 14-19. doi: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.27
25. Crall AW, Newman GJ, Stohlgren TJ, Holfelder KA, Graham J, Waller DM. Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study. Conserv Lett. 2011;4:433-442. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x
26. See L, Comber A, Salk C, Fritz S, van der Velde M, Perger C, et al. Comparing the quality of crowdsourced data contributed by expert and non-experts. Preis T, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2013;8:e69958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069958 PMID: 23936126
27. Butt N, Slade E, Thompson J, Malhi Y, Riutta T. Quantifying the sampling error in tree census measurements by volunteers and its effect on carbon stock estimates. Ecol Appl. Ecological Society of America; 2013;23:936-943. doi: 10.1890/11-2059.1
28. Smith AM, Lynn S, Sullivan M, Lintott CJ, Nugent PE, Botyanszki J, et al. Galaxy Zoo Supernovae. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2011;412:1309-1319. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17994.x
29. Hochachka WM, Fink D, Hutchinson RA, Sheldon D, Wong W-K, Kelling S. Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27:130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11. 006 PMID: 22192976
30. van Strien AJ, van Swaay CAM, Termaat T. Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. Devictor V, editor. J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:1450-1458. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12158
31. Reichman OJ, Jones MB, Schildhauer MP. Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology. Science (80-). 2011;331. doi: 10.1126/science.1197962
32. Sheppard SA, Wiggins A, Terveen L. Capturing quality: retaining provenance for curated volunteer monitoring data. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing-CSCW'14. ACM Press; 2014. pp. 1234-1245. doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531689
33. Otegui J, Ariño AH, Encinas MA, Pando F. Assessing the Primary Data Hosted by the Spanish Node of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Raghava GPS, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055144 PMID: 23372828
34. Crowl TA, Crist TO, Parmenter RR, Belovsky G, Lugo AE. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6:238-246. doi: 10.1890/070151
35. Shirk JL, Ballard HL, Wilderman CC, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Jordan R, et al. Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecol Soc. 2012;17:art29. doi: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
36. Wiggins A, Crowston K. Goals and Tasks: Two Typologies of Citizen Science Projects. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE; 2012. pp. 3426-3435. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.295
37. Daume S. Ecoveillance (Social media analysis web platform) [Internet]. 2012. Available: http://www.ecoveillance.org
38. Lindsey Kuper (@lindsey). "Saw this beautiful iridescent green bug today. Anyone know what it is? https://www.flickr.com/photos/lindseykuper/14360920608/...", 30 June 2014, 8:04 pm. Tweet. [Internet]. 2014. Available: https://twitter.com/lindsey/status/483808338015047680
39. Croitoru A, Crooks A, Radzikowski J, Stefanidis A, Vatsavai RR, Wayant N. Geoinformatics and Social Media: A New Big Data Challenge. In: Karimi HA, editor. Big Data Techniques and Technologies in Geoinformatics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014. pp. 207-232.
40. Darling E, Shiffman D, Côté I, Drew J. The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution. 2013. doi: 10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f
41. Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE. The science and application of ecological monitoring. Biol Conserv. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;143:1317-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon. 2010.02.013
42. Gärdenfors U, Jönsson M, Obst M, Wremp AM, Kindvall O, Nilsson J. Swedish LifeWatch - a biodiversity infrastructure integrating and reusing data from citizen science, monitoring and research. Hum Comput. 2014;1. doi: 10.15346/hc.v1i2.6
43. Davies L, Bell JNB, Bone J, Head M, Hill L, Howard C, et al. Open Air Laboratories (OPAL): a community-driven research programme. Environ Pollut. 2011;159:2203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02. 053 PMID: 21458125
44. Wood C, Sullivan B, Iliff M, Fink D, Kelling S. eBird: engaging birders in science and conservation. PLoSBiol. 2011;9:e1001220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001220 PMID: 22205876
45. Hu H, Wen Y, Chua T-S, Li X. Toward Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial. IEEE Access. IEEE; 2014;2:652-687. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2332453
46. Hill A, Guralnick R, Smith A, Sallans A, Rosemary Gillespie, Denslow M, et al. The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science. Zookeys. 2012;219-33. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.209.3472