Effects of different topographic correction methods on the simulation of surface wind speed and temperature in parameterization scheme of the YSU boundary layer

Acta Geophysica Sinica

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 803-815

  Zheng, Yi Jia ^a   Liu, Shu Hua ^a   Miao, Yu Cong ^a   Wang, Shu ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Boundary layer scheme; Surface meteorological factors; Topographic correction; Wind speed; WRF model

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; BOUNDARY LAYERS; SPEED; WEATHER FORECASTING;

METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS; PARAMETERIZATION SCHEMES; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TOPOGRAPHIC CORRECTION; UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON; WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODELS; WIND SPEED; WRF MODEL;

WIND;

AIRFLOW; BOUNDARY LAYER; ERROR CORRECTION; METEOROLOGY; PARAMETERIZATION; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE TEMPERATURE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TOPOGRAPHY; VERTICAL PROFILE; WIND VELOCITY;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

EID: 84962514836     PISSN: 00015733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6038/cjg20160304     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arino O, Bicheron P, Frédéric A, et al. 2008. GLOBCOVER: the most detailed portrait of earth. ESA Bulletin-European Space Agency, 136: 24-31.
2. Bontemps S, Defourney P, Van Bogaert P, et al. 2010. GLOBCOVER 2009: products description and validation report. Accessed January 20, 2012. http://www.gscloud.cn/userfiles/file/GLOBCOVER2009_Validation_ Report_2_2.pdf.
3. Chen F, Dudhia J. 2001. Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Review, 129(4): 569-585.
4. Cheng W Y Y, Steenburgh W J. 2005. Evaluation of surface sensible weather forecasts by the WRF and the Eta Models over the western United States. Weather and Forecasting, 20(5): 812-821.
5. Darby L S. 2005. Cluster analysis of surface winds in Houston, Texas, and the impact of wind patterns on ozone. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 44(12): 1788-1806.
6. Dudhia J. 1989. Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 46(20): 3077-3107.
7. Emery C A, Tai E, Yarwood G. 2001. Enhanced meteorological modeling and performance evaluation for two Texas ozone episodes. Prepared for the Texas Near Non-Attainment Areas through the Alamo Area Council of Governments, by ENVIRON International Corp, Novato, CA.
8. García-Bustamante E, González-Rouco J F, Jiménez P A, et al. 2009. A comparison of methodologies for monthly wind energy estimation. Wind Energy, 12(7): 640-659.
9. Georgelin M, Bougeault P, Black T, et al. 2000. The second COMPARE exercise: A model intercomparison using a case of a typical mesoscale orographic flow, the PYREX IOP3. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 126(564): 991-1029.
10. Guo H, Xu M, Hu Q. 2011. Changes in near-surface wind speed in China: 1969-2005. International Journal of Climatology, 31(3): 349-358.
11. Hong S Y, Pan H L. 1996. Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast Model. Monthly Weather Review, 124(10): 2322-2339.
12. Hong S Y, Dudhia J, Chen S H. 2004. A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Monthly Weather Review, 132(1): 103-120.
13. Hong S Y, Noh Y, Dudhia J. 2006. A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Monthly Weather Review, 134(9): 2318-2341.
14. Jiménez P A, González-Rouco J F, Montávez J P, et al. 2009. Climatology of wind patterns in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula. International Journal of Climatology, 29(4): 501-525.
15. Jiménez P A, González-Rouco J F, Garcia-Bustamante E, et al. 2010. Surface wind regionalization over complex terrain: Evaluation and analysis of a high-resolution WRF simulation. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49(2): 268-287.
16. Jiménez P A, Dudhia J. 2012. Improving the representation of resolved and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF Model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 51(2): 300-316.
17. Jimenez P A, Dudhia J. 2013. On the ability of the WRF model to reproduce the surface wind direction over complex terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 52(7): 1610-1617.
18. Kain J S. 2004. The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 43(1): 170-181.
19. Klink K. 2002. Trends and interannual variability of wind speed distributions in Minnesota. Journal of Climate, 15(22): 3311-3317.
20. Kusaka H, Kondo H, Kikegawa Y, et al. 2001. A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models: Comparison with multi-layer and slab models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 101(3): 329-358.
21. Kusaka H, Kimura F. 2004. Coupling a single-layer urban canopy model with a simple atmospheric model: Impact on urban heat island simulation for an idealized case. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 82(1): 67-80.
22. Mass C, Ovens D. 2010. WRF model physics: Problems, solutions, and a new paradigm for progress. // Preprints, 2010 WRF Users' Workshop, Boulder, CO, NCAR.
23. Mass C, Ovens D. 2011. Fixing WRF's high speed wind bias: A new subgrid scale drag parameterization and the role of detailed verification. // Preprints, 24th Conf. on Weather and Forecasting/20thConf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9B.6.
24. Mass C. 2012. Improved subgrid drag of hyper PBL/vertical resolution? Dealing with the stable PBL problems in WRF. WRF users' workshop, Boulder, CO.
25. Milton S F, Wilson C A. 1996. The impact of parameterized subgrid-scale orographic forcing on systematic errors in a global NWP model. Monthly Weather Review, 124(9): 2023-2045.
26. Mlawer E J, Taubman S J, Brown P D, et al. 1997. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 102(D14): 16663-16682.
27. Rife D L, Davis C A, Liu Y B, et al. 2004. Predictability of low-level winds by mesoscale meteorological models. Monthly Weather Review, 132(11): 2553-2569.
28. Rontu L. 2006. A study on parametrization of orography-related momentum fluxes in a synoptic-scale NWP model. Tellus A, 58(1): 69-81.
29. Roux G, Liu Y B, Monache L D, et al. 2009. Verification of high resolution WRF-RTFDDA surface forecasts over mountains and plains. 10th WRF users' workshop, 20-23.
30. Shimada S, Ohsawa T, Chikaoka S, et al. 2011. Accuracy of the wind speed profile in the lower PBL as simulated by the WRF model. Sola, 7: 109-112.
31. Skamarock W C, Klemp J B, Dudhia J, et al. 2008. A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Rep. TN-4751STR, 113 pp.
32. Stull R B. 1988. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Netherlands: Springer.
33. Whiteman C D. 2000. Mountain Meteorology: Fundamentals and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Willmott C J, Ackleson S G, Davis R E, et al. 1985. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 90(C5): 8995-9005.
35. Yang G, Liu S H, Zhu R, et al. 2011. Numerical simulation of features of boundary-layer over Poyang Lake area. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 54(4): 896-908, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.04.003.
36. Zhang B H, Liu S H, Liu H P, et al. 2012. The effect of MYJ and YSU schemes on simulation of boundary layer meteorological factors of WRF. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 55(7): 2239-2248, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.07.010.