Postoperative Hemodynamic Index Measurement with Miniaturized Dynamic Light Scattering Predicts Colorectal Anastomotic Healing

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 115-123

  Wu, Zhouqiao ^a,b   Boersema, Geesien S A ^a   Taha, Diman ^a   Fine, Ilya ^c   Menon, Anand ^d   Kleinrensink, Gert Jan ^a   Jeekel, Johannes ^a   Lange, Johan F ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY CANCER HOSPITAL AND INSTITUTE   (China)

^c Elfi Tech Limited   (Israel)

^d Academic Colorectal Center   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

anastomotic leakage; colorectal surgery; early detection; ischemia; perfusion; real time monitor

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ABSCESS; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOTIC BURSTING PRESSURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXPERIMENTAL COLITIS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LOCAL HEMODYNAMIC INDEX; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERFUSION; PHOTON CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE; RAT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WEIGHT REDUCTION; WOUND HEALING; ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL; COLON; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECTUM; SURGERY; WISTAR RAT;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANIMALS; COLON; DYNAMIC LIGHT SCATTERING; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RECTUM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84962513810     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350615618286     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Snijders HS, Wouters MW, van Leersum NJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38: 1013-1019.
2. Komen N, de Bruin RW, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF,. Anastomotic leakage, the search for a reliable biomarker: a review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2008; 10: 109-115; discussion 115-117.
3. Erb L, Hyman NH, Osler T,. Abnormal vital signs are common after bowel resection and do not predict anastomotic leak. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1195-1199.
4. Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA,. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 254-258.
5. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery. 2010; 147: 339-351.
6. Cong ZJ, Hu LH, Bian ZQ, et al. Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e75519.
7. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW,. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000; 179: 92-96.
8. Guo S, Dipietro LA,. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010; 89: 219-229.
9. Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V,. Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 76-82.
10. Wang H, Shi L, Qin J, Yousefi S, Li Y, Wang RK,. Multimodal optical imaging can reveal changes in microcirculation and tissue oxygenation during skin wound healing. Lasers Surg Med. 2014; 46: 470-478.
11. Núñez SC, Nogueira GEC, Ribeiro MS, Garcez AS, Lage-Marques JL,. He-ne laser effects on blood microcirculation during wound healing: a method of in vivo study through laser doppler flowmetry. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 35: 363-368.
12. Boyle NH, Pearce A, Hunter D, Owen WJ, Mason RC,. Intraoperative scanning laser doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 188: 498-502.
13. Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Baas PC, et al. Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy in esophageal and colorectal anastomoses. Eur Surg Res. 2008; 41: 303-311.
14. Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF,. Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 6: 14-26.
15. Fine I, Kaminsky A, Kuznik B, Shenkman L,. A non-invasive method for the assessment of hemostasis in vivo by using dynamic light scattering. Laser Phys. 2012; 22: 469-475.
16. Hathcock JJ,. Flow effects on coagulation and thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1729-1737.
17. Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C,. Vascular wall shear stress: basic principles and methods. Hell J Cardiol. 2005; 46: 9-15.
18. Wu Z, Daams F, Boersema GS, et al. Colorectal anastomotic leakage caused by insufficient suturing after partial colectomy: a new experimental model. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014; 15: 733-738.
19. Wu Z, Boersema GSA, Kroese LF, et al. Reducing colorectal anastomotic leakage with tissue adhesive in experimental inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory bowel diseases 2015; 21: 1038-1046
20. Rodgers K, Xiong S, Espinoza T, Roda N, Maldonado S, diZerega GS,. Angiotensin II increases host resistance to peritonitis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000; 7: 635-640.
21. Verco SJS, Peers EM, Brown CB, Rodgers KE, Roda N,. Development of a novel glucose polymer solution (icodextrin) for adhesion prevention: pre-clinical studies. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 1764-1772.
22. Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM, Straub EM, Savvas V,. Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1990: 1009-1016.
23. Phillips JD, Kim CS, Fonkalsrud EW, Zeng H, Dindar H,. Effects of chronic corticosteroids and vitamin a on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1992; 163: 71-77.
24. Wu Z, Vakalopoulos KA, Boersema GSA, et al. The prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage with tissue adhesives in a contaminated environment is associated with the presence of anti-inflammatory macrophages. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014; 29: 1507-1516.
25. Daams F, Wu Z, Cakir H, Karsten TM, Lange JF,. Identification of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery using microdialysis of the peritoneal cavity. Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 18: 65-71.
26. Komen N, Slieker J, de Kort P, et al. High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011; 26: 1075-1078.
27. Tateishi S, Arima S, Futami K,. Assessment of blood flow in the small intestine by laser doppler flowmetry: comparison of healthy small intestine and small intestine in Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol. 1997; 32: 457-463.
28. Wilson SB, Jennings PE, Belch JJ,. Detection of microvascular impairment in type I diabetics by laser Doppler flowmetry. Clin Physiol. 1992; 12: 195-208.
29. Komen N, Klitsie P, Dijk JW, et al. Calcium score: a new risk factor for colorectal anastomotic leakage. Am J Surg. 2011; 201: 759-765.
30. Tateishi S, Arima S, Futami K,. Assessment of blood flow in the small intestine by laser Doppler flowmetry: comparison of healthy small intestine and small intestine in Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol. 1997; 32: 457-463.
31. Millan M, Garcia-Granero E, Flor B, Garcia-Botello S, Lledo S,. Early prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery by intramucosal ph. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49: 595-601.
32. Fine I, Kaminsky A,. Speckle-based measurement of the light scattering by red blood cells in vivo. Proc SPIE. 2011; 7898: 78980A-78914.
33. de Hingh I, De Man BM, Lomme R, Van Goor H, Hendriks T,. Colonic anastomotic strength and matrix metalloproteinase activity in an experimental model of bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg. 2003; 90: 981-988.
34. Shandall A, Lowndes R, Young HL,. Colonic anastomotic healing and oxygen tension. Br J Surg. 1985; 72: 606-609.
35. Hsieh C-H, Yeong E-K, Lin K-P,. Portable laser Doppler flowmetry in studying the effect of diabetes mellitus on cutaneous microcirculation. J Med Biol Eng. 2003; 23: 13-18.