Linear response theory: An alternative to PB and GB methods for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories?

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 458-467

  Morreale, Antonio ^a   De La Cruz, Xavier ^a,b   Meyer, Tim ^a   Gelpí, Josep Lluís ^a,c   Luque, F Javier ^c   Orozco, Modesto ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; WATER;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CALCULATION; ENERGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIMULATION; SOLVATION; TECHNIQUE; THEORY;

EID: 84962438833     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20169     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Warshel A. Bicycle-pedal model for the first step in the vision process. Nature 1976;260:679-683.
2. McCammon JA. Molecular Dynamics Study of the Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor, in "Report of the 1976 Workshop, Models for Protein Dynamics" Berendsen HJC, editor. Models for protein dynamics. CECAM, Université de Paris IX Orsay, France; 1976. p 137.
3. McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 1977;267:585-590.
4. Orozco M, Rueda M, Blas JR, Cubero E, Luque FJ, Laughton CA. Molecular dynamic simulations of nucleic acids. In: Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. New York: Wiley (in press).
5. Orozco M, Pérez A, Noy A, Luque FJ. Theoretical Methods for the Simulation of Nucleic Acids. Chem Soc Rev 2003; 32:350-364
6. McCammon JA, Harvey SC. Dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
7. Wang W, Donini O, Reyes CM, Kollman PA. Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force-fields simulations of enzyme catalysis protein-ligand protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2001;30:211-243.
8. Kollman PA. Advances and continuing challenges in achieving realistic and predictive simulations of the properties of organic and biological molecules. Acc Chem Res 1996;29:461-469.
9. Cheatham TE, Kollman PA. Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids. Ann Rev Phys Chem 2000;51:435-471.
10. Van Gunsteren WF, Mark AE. On the interpretation of biochemical data by molecular dynamics computer simulation. Eur J Biochem 1992;204:947-961.
11. Van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJ. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: methodology applications and perspectives in chemistry. Angew Che Int Ed Engl 1990;29:992-1023.
12. Karplus M, Petsko GA. Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature 1990;347:631-639.
13. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nature Struct Biol 2002;9:646-652.
14. Warshel A. Computer modeling of chemical reactions in enzymes and solutions. New York: Wiley; 1991.
15. Orozco M, Luque PJ. Theoretical methods for the description of the solvent effect in biomolecular systems. Chem Rev 2000;100:4187-4225.
16. Andricioaei I, Karplus M. On the calculation of entropy from covariance matrices of the atomic fluctuations. J Chem Phys 2001;115:6289-6292.
17. Schlitter J. Estimation of absolute and relative entropies of macromolecules using the covariance matrix. Chem Phys Let 1993;215:617-621.
18. Harris SA, Gavathiotis E, Searle MS, Orozco M, Laughton CA. Cooperativity in drug-DNA recognition: a molecular dynamics study. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:12658-12663.
19. Schafer H, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. Absolute entropies from molecular dynamics simulation trajectories. J Chem Phys 2000;113:7809-7817.
20. Weiser J, Shenkin PS, Still WC. Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combination of pairwise overlaps (LCPO). J Comp Chem 1999;20:217-230.
21. Gilson MK, Honig B. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energies binding energies and conformational analysis. Proteins 1988;4:7-18.
22. Davis ME, McCammon JA. Electrostatics in biomolecular structure and dynamics. Chem Rev 1990;90:509-521.
23. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990; 112:6127-6129.
24. Srinivasan J, Cheatham TE, Kollman PA, Case DA. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of DNA RNA and phosphoramidate-DNA helices. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:9401-9409.
25. Lee MR, Duan Y, Kollman PA. Use of MM/PB/SA in estimating the free energies of proteins: application to native intermediates and unfolded vilin headpiece. Proteins 2000;39:309-316.
26. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Wang W, Donini O, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE. Calculating the structure and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 2000;33:889-897.
27. Cubero E, Luque FJ, Orozco M. Theoretical studies of d(A:T)-based parallel-stranded DNA duplexes. JAm Chem Soc 2001;123:12018-12025.
28. Cubero E, Abrescia NGA, Subirana JA, Luque FJ, Orozco M. Theoretical study of a new DNA structure: the antiparallel Hoogsteen duplex. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:14603-14612.
29. Böttcher CJF. Theory of electrostatic polarisation. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1952.
30. Tomasi J, Persico M. Molecular interactions in solution: an overview of methods based on continuous distributions of the solvent. Chem Rev 1994;94: 2027-2094.
31. Cramer CJ, Truhlar DF. Implicit solvation models: equilibria structure spectra and dynamics. Chem Rev 1999;99:2161-2200.
32. Luque FJ, Curutchet C, Muñoz-Muriedas J, Bidon-Chanal A, Soteras I, Morreale A , Gelpí JL, Orozco M. Continuum solvation models: Dissecting the free energy of solvation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2003;5:3827-3836.
33. Rivail JL, Rinaldi D. In: Liquid-State Quantum Chemistry: Computational Applications of the Polarizable Continuum Models, Leszczynski J, editor. Computational chemistry reviews of current trends. Singapore; World Scientific; 1995. p 139.
34. Curutchet C, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG, Ruiz-López MF, Rinaldi D, Orozco M, Luque FJ. Electrostatic component of solvation comparison of SCRF continuum models. J Comp Chem 2003;24:284-297.
35. Curutchet C, Orozco M, Luque FJ. Solvation in octanol: parametrization of the continuum MST model. J Comp Chem 2001;22:1180-1193.
36. Warshel J, Aqvist J. Electrostatic energy and macromolecular function. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1991;20:267-298.
37. Schutz CN, Warshel A. What are the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? Proteins 2001;44:400-417.
38. Warshel A, Russell ST, Churg AK. Macroscopic models for studies of electrostatic interactions in proteins: limitations and applicability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:4785-4789.
39. Lee FS, Chu ZT, Warshel A. Microscopic and semimicroscopic calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins by the POLARIS and ENZYMIX programs. J Comp Chem 1993;14:161-185.
40. Lee FS, Chu ZT, Bolger MB, Warshel A. Calculations of antibody-antigen interactions: microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of the free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603. Prot Eng 1992;5:215-228.
41. Warshel A, Rusell ST. Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions. Q Rev Biophys 1984;17:283-422.
42. Roux B, Yu HA, Karplus M. Molecular basis for the Born model of ion solvation. J Phys Chem 1990;94:4683-4688.
43. King U, Warshel A. Investigation of the free-energy functions for electron-transfer reactions. J Chem Phys 1990;93:8682-8692.
44. Kong YS, Warshel A. Linear free energy relationships with quantum mechanical corrections: classical and quantum mechanical rate constants for hydride transfer between NAD+ analogs in solutions. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:6234-6242.
45. Aqvist J. Ion water interaction potentials derived from free-energy perturbation simulations. J Phys Chem 1990;94:8021-8024.
46. Aqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson JE. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Prot Eng 1994;7:385-391.
47. Aqvist J, Hansson T. Validity of electrostatic linear response in polar solvents. J Phys Chem 1996;100:9512-9521.
48. Orozco M, Luque FJ, Habibolahzadeh D, Gao J. The polarization contribution to the free energy of hydration. J Chem Phys 1995;102:6145-6152.
49. Carlson HA, Jorgensen WL. An extended linear response method for determining free energies of hydration. J Phys Chem 1995;99:10667-10673.
50. Pierce AC, Jorgensen WL. Estimation of binding affinities for selective thrombin inhibitors via Monte Carlo simulations. J Med Chem 2001;44:1043-1050.
51. Wesolowski SS, Jorgensen WL. Estimation of binding affinities for celecoxib analogues with COX-2 via Monte Carlo-extended linear response. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002;12:267-270.
52. Levy R.M, Belhadj M, Kitchen, D.E. Gaussian fluctuation formula for electrostatic free-energy changes in solution. J Chem Phys 1991;3627-3633.
53. Kuharsi R.A, Bader J.S, Chandler D, Sprik M, Klein M, Impey R.W. Molecular model for aqueous ferrous-ferric electron transfer. J Chem Phys 1991;3627-3633.
54. Ulstruo, J. Charge transfer processes in condensed media. New York: Springer; 1979.
55. Orozco M, Luque FJ. Generalized Linear Response Approximation in Discrete Methods. Chem Phys Lett 1997;265:473-480
56. Miertus S, Tomasi J. Approximate evaluations of the electrostatic free energy and internal energy changes in solution processes. Chem Phys 1982;65:239-245
57. Miertus S, Scrocco E, Tomasi J. Electrostatic interaction of a solute with a continuum. A direct utilization of ab initio molecular potentials for the prevision of solvent effects. Chem Phys 1981;55:117-129
58. Bachs M, Luque FJ, Orozco M. Optimization of solute cavities and van der Waals parameters in ab initio MST-SCRF calculations of neutral molecules. J Comput Chem 1994;15:446-454
59. Orozco M, Bachs M, Luque FJ. Development of optimized MST/ SCRF methods for semiempirical calculations: the MNDO and PM3 Hamiltonians. J Comput Chem 1995;16:563-575
60. Luque FJ, ZhangY, Aleman C, Bachs M, Gao J, Orozco M. Solvent Effects in Chloroform Solution: parametrization of the MST/SCRF Continuum Model. J Phys Chem 1996;100:4269-4276
61. Luque FJ, Alemán C, Bachs M, Orozco M. Extension of MST/SCRF method to organic solvents: ab initio and semiempirical parametrization for neutral solutes in CC14. J Comput Chem 1996;17:806-820
62. Insight II Computer Program Accelrys Co., San Diego, CA. 2003
63. Gelpi JL, Kalko SG, Barril X, Cirera J, de la Cruz X, Luque FJ, Orozco M. Classical molecular interaction potentials: improved setup procedure in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Proteins 2001;45:428-437
64. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977;23:327-341
65. Darden TA, York DM, Pedersen LG. Particle mesh Ewald: an NXlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993;98:10089-10092
66. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Fergurson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins nucleic acids and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197
67. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926-935
68. Bayly CE, Cieplak P, Cornell WD, Kollman PA. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem 1993;97:10269-10280
69. Case DA, Pearlman DA, Caldwell JW, Cheatham TE III, Ross WS, Simmerling CL, Darden TL, Marz KM, Stanton RV, Cheng AL, Vincent JJ, Crowley M, Tsui V, Radmer RJ, Duan Y, Pitera J, Massova I, Seibel GL, Singh UC, Weiner PK, Kollman PA. AMBER6. University of California, San Francisco. 1999
70. Pearlman DA, Case DA, Caldwell JW, Ross WS, Cheatham TE, DeBolt S, Fergurson D, Seibel G, Kollman PA. AMBER a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics normal mode analysis molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Computer Physics Communications 1995;91:1-41
71. Weise J, Shenkin PS, Still WC. Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO). J Comp Chem 1999;20:217-230
72. Bashford D, Gerwert K. Electrostatic calculations of the pKa values of ionizable groups in bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol 1992;224:473-496
73. Tsui V, Case D. Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acids with a generalized born solvation model. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:2489-2498.
74. Feig M, Onufriev A, Lee MS, Im W, Case DA, Brooks CL III. Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures. J Comput Chem 2004;25:265-284.