Quality of neck dissection operative reports

American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 330-333

  Nocon, Cheryl C ^a,c   Cohen, Marc A ^b   Langerman, Alexander J ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSORY NERVE; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; HUMAN; HYPOGLOSSAL NERVE; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; LINGUAL NERVE; LYMPH NODE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECK DISSECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUBMANDIBULAR GLAND; SUBMANDIBULAR GLAND DUCT; SURGEON; VAGUS NERVE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEDICAL RECORD; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DATA ACCURACY; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; NECK DISSECTION; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84962326251     PISSN: 01960709     EISSN: 1532818X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. [1] Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook, management of the environment of care chapter. Jt Comm Perspect 17 (1997), EC7–EC9.
2. [2] Edhemovic, I., Temple, W.J., de Gara, C.J., et al. The computer synoptic operative report—a leap forward in the science of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 11 (2004), 941–947.
3. [3] Wiebe, M.E., Sandhu, L., Takata, J.L., et al. Quality of narrative operative reports in pancreatic surgery. Can J Surg 56 (2013), E121–E127.
4. [4] Park, J., Pillarisetty, V.G., Brennan, M.F., et al. Electronic synoptic operative reporting: assessing the reliability and completeness of synoptic reports for pancreatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 211 (2010), 308–315.
5. [5] Shayah, A., Agada, O., Gunasekaran, S., et al. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard. Int J Clin Pract 61 (2007), 677–679.
6. [6] Harvey, A., Zhang, H., Nixon, J., et al. Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control. Surgery 141 (2007), 708–714.
7. [7] Stewart, L., Hunter, J.G., Wetter, A., et al. Operative report: form and function. Arch Surg 145 (2010), 865–871.
8. [8] Wauben, L.S., Coossens, R., Lange, J.F., Evaluation of operative notes concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are standards being met?. World J Surg 34 (2010), 903–909.
9. [9] Laflamme, M.R., Dexter, P.R., Graham, M.F., et al. Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2005, 425–429.
10. [10] Scherer, R., Zhu, Q., Langenberg, P., et al. Comparison of information obtained by operative note abstraction with that recorded on a standardized data collection form. Surgery 133 (2003), 324–330.
11. [11] Mack, L.A., Dabbs, K., Temple, W.J., Synoptic operative record for point of care outcomes: a leap forward in knowledge translation. Eur J Surg Oncol 36 (2010), 544–549.
12. [12] Donahoe, L., Bennett, S., Temple, W., et al. Completeness of dictated operative reports in breast cancer—the case for synoptic reporting. J Surg Oncol 106 (2012), 79–83.
13. [13] Chambers, A.J., Pasieka, J.L., Temple, W.J., Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system. Surgery 146 (2009), 1090–1098.
14. [14] ten Broek, R.P., van den Beukel, B.A., van Goor, H., Comparison of operative notes with real-time observation of adhyesiolysis-related complications during surgery. Br J Surg 100 (2013), 426–432.
15. [15] Platz, J., Hyman, N., Tracking intraoperative complications. J Am Coll Surg 215 (2012), 519–523.
16. [16] Wauben, L.S., van Grevenstein, W.M., Goossens, R.H., et al. Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98 (2011), 1431–1436.
17. [17] Gambadauro, P., Magos, A., Surgical videos for accident analysis, performance improvement, and complication prevention: time for a surgical black box?. Surg Innov 19 (2012), 76–80.
18. [18] Silas, M.R., Grasia, I., Langerman, A., Video recording of the operating room—is anonymity possible?. J Surg Res 197 (2015), 272–276.
19. [19] Lydiatt, D.D., Medical malpractice and head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12 (2004), 71–75.
20. [20] Morris, L.G.T., Ziff, D.J.S., DeLacure, M.D., Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134 (2008), 102–107.
21. [21] Lefter, L.P., Walker, S.R., Dewhurst, F., et al. An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve. ANZ J Surg 78 (2008), 800–802.
22. [22] Weymuller, E.A. Jr., Clinical staging and operative reporting for multi-institutional trials in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 19 (1997), 650–658.
23. [23] Gur, I., Gur, D., Recebaren, J.A., The computerized synoptic operative report. Arch Surg 147 (2012), 71–74.
24. [24] Novitsky, Y.W., Sing, R.F., Kercher, K.W., et al. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents. Am Surg 71 (2005), 627–631.
25. [25] Flynn, M.B., Allen, D.A., The operative note as billing documentation: a preliminary report. Am Surg 70 (2004), 570–574.
26. [26] Vergis, A., Gillman, L., Minor, S., et al. Structured assessment format for evaluating operative reports in general surgery. Am J Surg 195 (2008), 24–29.
27. [27] Melton, G.B., Burkart, N.E., Frey, N.G., et al. Operative report teaching and synoptic operative reports: a national survey of surgical program directors. J Am Coll Surg 218 (2014), 113–118.