Synoptic operative record for point of care outcomes: A leap forward in knowledge translation

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Mack, L A ^a   Dabbs, K ^b   Temple, W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Synoptic operative record

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALBERTA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; KNOWLEDGE; MASTECTOMY; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77955658950     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. L.A. Mack, O.F. Bathe, and M.A. Hebert, et al. Opening the black box of cancer surgery quality: WebSMR and the Alberta experience J Surg Oncol 99 2009 525 530
2. F.R. Elevitch SNOMED CT: electronic health record enhances anesthesia patient safety AANA J 73 2005 361 366
3. F.J. Cruz-Correia, P.M. Viera-Marquies, and A.M. Ferreira, et al. Reviewing the integration of patient data: how systems are evolving in practice to meet patient needs BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7 2007 14
4. I. Edhemovic, W.J. Temple, and C.J. de Gara, et al. The computer synoptic operative report - a leap forward in the science of surgery Ann Surg Oncol 11 2004 941 947
5. L.P. Lefter, S.R. Walker, and F. Dewhurst, et al. An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve ANZ J Surg 78 2008 800 802
6. J.D. Nicopoullos, S. Karrar, and A. Gour, et al. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma-completion of the audit cycle J Obstet Gynaecol 23 2003 381 386
7. A. Shayah, F.O. Agada, and S. Gunasekaran, et al. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard Int J Clin Pract 61 2007 677 679
8. A. Harvey, H. Zhang, and J. Nixon, et al. Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control Surgery 114 2007 708 714
9. D.A. Cowan, M.B. Sands, and S.M. Rabizadeh, et al. Electronic templates versus dictation for the completion of Mohs micrographic surgery operative notes Dermatol Surg 33 2007 588 595
10. S.S. Cross, K.M. Feeley, and C.A. Angel The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas J Clin Pathol 51 1998 481 482
11. K. Rigby, S.R. Brown, and G. Lakin, et al. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting Ann R Coll Surg Engl 81 1999 401 403
12. R.Z. Karim, K.S. van den Berg, and M.H. Colman, et al. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma Histopathology 52 2008 130 138
13. G. Delaney, J. Shafiq, and G. Chappell, et al. Establishing treatment benchmarks for mammography-screened breast cancer population based on a review of evidence-based guidelines Cancer 112 2008 1912 1922
14. M.T. Rickard, R.J. Taylor, and M.A. Fazli, et al. Interval breast cancers in an Australian mammographic screening program Med J Aust 169 1998 184 187
15. D.L. Hershman, D. Buono, and J.S. Jacobson, et al. Surgeon characteristics and use of breast conservation surgery in women with early stage breast cancer Ann Surg 249 2009 828 833
16. D. Lazovich, C.C. Solomon, and D.B. Thomas, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Heath Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma Cancer 86 1999 628 637
17. K.P. McGuire, A.A. Santillan, and P. Kaur, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients Ann Surg Oncol 16 2009 2682 2690
18. T.G. Weiser, A.B. Haynes, and G. Dziekan, et al. Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population Ann Surg 251 2010 976 980
19. J.F. Rodriguez, A.R. Trobo, and M.V. Garcia, et al. The effect of performance feedback on wound infection rate in abdominal hysterectomy Am J Infect Control 34 2006 182 187
20. K.S. Rowell, F.E. Turrentine, and M.M. Hutter, et al. Use of national surgical quality improved program data as a catalyst for quality improvement J Am Coll Surg 204 2007 1293 1300
21. B.L. Hall, B.H. Hamilton, and K. Richards, et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals Ann Surg 250 2009 363 376
22. W.J. Temple, W.P. Francis, and E. Tamano, et al. Synoptic surgical reporting for breast cancer surgery: an innovation in knowledge translation Am J Surg 2010 Feb 15