The computerized synoptic operative report: A novel tool in surgical residency education

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 147, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-74

  Gur, Ilia ^a   Gur, Daniel ^c   Recabaren, James A ^a,b  

^a HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Teledata Networks   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; DATA PROCESSING; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NARRATIVE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84855997944     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.228     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Edhemovic I, Temple WJ, de Gara CJ, Stuart GC. The computer synoptic operative report - a leap forward in the science of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004; 11(10):941-947. (Pubitemid 40486681)
2. Lissauer T, Paterson CM, Simons A, Beard RW. Evaluation of computer generated neonatal discharge summaries. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66(4 Spec No.):433-436.
3. van Walraven C, Laupacis A, Seth R, Wells G. Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial. CMAJ. 1999;160 (3):319-326. (Pubitemid 29092554)
4. Adams DC, Bristol JB, Poskitt KR. Surgical discharge summaries: improving the record. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;75(2):96-99. (Pubitemid 23089474)
5. Moore RA. The dictated operative note: important but is it being taught? J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(5):639-640. (Pubitemid 30230713)
6. Novitsky YW, Sing RF, Kercher KW, Griffo ML, Matthews BD, Heniford BT. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents. Am Surg. 2005;71(8):627-631, discussion 631-632.
7. Gillman LM, Vergis A, Park J, Minor S, Taylor M. Structured operative reporting: a randomized trial using dictation templates to improve operative reporting. Am J Surg. 2010;199(6):846-850.
8. Gillman LM, Vergis A, Hardy K, Park J, Taylor M. Resident training and the dictated operative report: a national perspective. Can J Surg. 2010;53(4):246-250.
9. Chambers AJ, Pasieka JL, Temple WJ. Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system. Surgery. 2009;146(6):1090-1098.
10. Laflamme MR, Dexter PR, Graham MF, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005: 425-429.
11. Harvey A, Zhang H, Nixon J, Brown CJ. Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality control. Surgery. 2007;141(6):708-714. (Pubitemid 46856571)
12. Mack LA, Bathe OF, Hebert MA, et al. Opening the black box of cancer surgery quality: Web SMR and the Alberta experience. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(8):525-530.
13. Temple WJ, Francis WP, Tamano E; Cancer Surgery Alberta. Synoptic surgical reporting for breast cancer surgery: an innovation in knowledge translation. Am J Surg. 2010;199(6):770-775.
14. Adair JG. The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69:334-345. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334.