Sensitivity of real-data simulations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell and associated tornadoes to multimoment microphysics. Part II: Analysis of buoyancy and dynamic pressure forces in simulated tornado-like vortices

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 1039-1061

  Dawson, Daniel T ^a,c   Xue, Ming ^a   Shapiro, Alan ^a   Milbrandt, Jason A ^b   Schenkman, Alexander D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Atm ocean structure Phenomena; Buoyancy; Circulation dynamics; Cloud parameterizations; Cloud resolving models; Dynamics; Models and modeling; Supercells; Tornadoes

Indexed keywords

BUOYANCY; DROPS; DYNAMICS; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); RAIN; TORNADOES;

CLOUD PARAMETERIZATIONS; CLOUD RESOLVING MODEL; DROP SIZE DISTRIBUTION; GRADIENT ACCELERATION; MICROPHYSICS PARAMETERIZATION; PRESSURE PERTURBATION; SUPER CELL; VERTICAL ACCELERATIONS;

VORTEX FLOW;

ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; BUOYANCY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; SUPERCELL; TORNADO; VORTICITY;

OKLAHOMA [OKLAHOMA (STT)]; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84962321540     PISSN: 00224928     EISSN: 15200469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0114.1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams, J. C., 1989: MUDPACK: Multigrid portable FORTRAN software for the efficient solution of linear elliptic partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput., 34, 113-146, doi:10.1016/0096-3003(89)90010-6.
2. Adams, J. C., and P. Smolarkiewicz, 2001: Modified multigrid for 3D elliptic equations with cross-derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput., 121, 301-312, doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(00)00004-7.
3. Beck, J., and C. Weiss, 2013: An assessment of low-level baroclinity and vorticity within a simulated supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 649-669, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00115.1.
4. Craven, J. P., and H. Brooks, 2004: Baseline climatology of sounding derived parameters associated with deep moist convection. Natl. Wea. Dig., 28, 13-24.
5. Dahl, J. M. L., M. D. Parker, and L. J. Wicker, 2012: Uncertainties in trajectory calculations within near-surface mesocyclones of simulated supercells. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2959-2966, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00131.1.
6. Das, P., 1979: A non-Archimedean approach to the equations of convection dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 2183-2190, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<2183:ANAATT>2.0.CO;2.
7. Davies, J. M., 2004: Estimations of CIN and LFC associated with tornadic and nontornadic supercells. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 714-726, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0714:EOCALA>2.0.CO;2.
8. Davies, J. M., 2006: Tornadoes with cold core 500-mb lows. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 1051-1062, doi:10.1175/WAF967.1.
9. Davies-Jones, R. P., 1986: Tornado dynamics. Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics, E. Kessler, Ed., University of Oklahoma Press, 197-236.
10. Davies-Jones, R. P., 2003: An expression for effective buoyancy in surroundings with horizontal density gradients. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2922-2925, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2922:AEFEBI>2.0.CO;2.
11. Dawson, D. T., E. R. Mansell, Y. Jung, L. J. Wicker, M. R. Kumjian, and M. Xue, 2014: Low-level ZDR signatures in supercell forward flanks: the role of size sorting and melting of hail. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 276-299, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0118.1.
12. Dawson, D. T., M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, and A. Shapiro, 2015: Sensitivity of real-data simulations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell and associated tornadoes to multi-moment microphysics. Part I: Storm-and tornado-scale numerical forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2241-2265, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00279.1.
13. Doswell, C. A., and P. M. Markowski, 2004: Is buoyancy a relative quantity? Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 853-863, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0853:IBARQ>2.0.CO;2.
14. Emanuel, K. A., 1994: Atmospheric Convection. Oxford University Press, 580 pp.
15. Eskridge, R. E., P. Das, R. K. Smith, and L. M. Leslie, 1979: Comment on the paper entitled 'Tornadogenesis' by R. K. Smith and L. M. Leslie (Q.J., 104, 189-199). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 105, 310-313, doi:10.1002/qj.49710544322.
16. Gilmore, M. S., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2004: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2610-2627, doi:10.1175/MWR2810.1.
17. Houze, R. A., Jr., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.
18. Jeevanjee, N., and D. M. Romps, 2015: Effective buoyancy, inertial pressure, and the mechanical generation of boundary-layer mass flux by cold pools. J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 3199-3213, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-14-0349.1.
19. Kumjian, M. R., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2008: Polarimetric signatures in supercell thunderstorms. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 1940-1961, doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1874.1.
20. Kumjian, M. R., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2012: The impact of size sorting on the polarimetric radar variables. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2042-2060, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0125.1.
21. Lee, B. D., C. A. Finley, and C. D. Karstens, 2012: The Bowdle, South Dakota, cyclic tornadic supercell of 22 May 2010: Surface analysis of rear-flank downdraft evolution and multiple internal surges. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 3419-3441, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00351.1.
22. Leslie, L. M., and R. K. Smith, 1978: The effect of vertical stability on tornadogenesis. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1281-1288, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<1281:TEOVSO>2.0.CO;2.
23. Ludlam, F. H., 1963: Severe local storms: A review. Severe Local Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 27, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1-30.
24. Markowski, P. M., 2002: Mobile mesonet observations on 3 May 1999. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 430-444, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2.
25. Markowski, P. M., and Y. Richardson, 2010: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes. John Wiley and Sons, 407 pp.
26. Markowski, P. M., and Y. P. Richardson, 2014: The influence of environmental low-level shear and cold pools on tornadogenesis: Insights from idealized simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 243-275, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0159.1.
27. Markowski, P. M., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2002: Direct surface thermodynamic observations within the rear-flank downdrafts of nontornadic and tornadic supercells. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1692-1721, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1692:DSTOWT>2.0.CO;2.
28. Markowski, P. M., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2003: Tornadogenesis resulting from the transport of circulation by a downdraft: Idealized numerical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 795-823, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0795:TRFTTO>2.0.CO;2.
29. Marshall, J. S., and W. M. Palmer, 1948: The distribution of raindrops with size. J. Meteor., 5, 165-166, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005<0165:TDORWS>2.0.CO;2.
30. Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005: A multi-moment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3065-3081, doi:10.1175/JAS3535.1.
31. Naylor, J., and M. S. Gilmore, 2014: Vorticity evolution leading to tornadogenesis and tornadogenesis failure in simulated supercells. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 1201-1217, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0219.1.
32. Parker, M. D., 2012: Impacts of lapse rates on low-level rotation in idealized storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 538-559, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-058.1.
33. Rasmussen, E. N., and D. O. Blanchard, 1998: A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 1148-1164, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<1148:ABCOSD>2.0.CO;2.
34. Richardson, Y. P., P. M. Markowski, S. Waugh, and S. E. Fredrickson, 2010: Mobile mesonet observations during VORTEX2. 25th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P6.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/25SLS/techprogram/paper_176206.htm.]
35. Romine, G. S., D. W. Burgess, and R. B. Wilhelmson, 2008: A dual-polarization-radar-based assessment of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City area tornadic supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2849-2870, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2330.1.
36. Schenkman, A. D., M. Xue, and A. Shapiro, 2012: Tornadogenesis in a simulated mesovortex within a mesoscale convective system. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3372-3390, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-038.1.
37. Schenkman, A. D., M. Xue, and M. Hu, 2014: Tornadogenesis in a high-resolution simulation of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City supercell. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 130-154, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-073.1.
38. Shabbott, C. J., and P. M. Markowski, 2006: Surface in situ observations within the outflow of forward-flank downdrafts of supercell thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1422-1441, doi:10.1175/MWR3131.1.
39. Snook, N., and M. Xue, 2008: Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24803, doi:10.1029/2008GL035866.
40. Speheger, D. A., C. A. Doswell III, and G. J. Stumpf, 2002: The tornadoes of 3 May 1999: Event verification in central Oklahoma and related issues. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 362-381, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0362:TTOMEV>2.0.CO;2.
41. Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2009: Convective-scale warn-on-forecast system: A vision for 2020. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1487-1499, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2795.1.
42. Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2013: Progress and challenges with warn-on-forecast. Atmos. Res., 123, 2-16, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.004.
43. Straka, J. M., E. N. Rasmussen, and S. E. Fredrickson, 1996: A mobile mesonet for finescale meteorological observations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 13, 921-936, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0921:AMMFFM>2.0.CO;2.
44. Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1243-1261, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<1243:CPSWSE>2.0.CO;2.
45. Xia, J., W. S. Lewellen, and D. C. Lewellen, 2003: Influence of mach number on tornado corner flow dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2820-2825, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2820:IOMNOT>2.0.CO;2.
46. Xue, M., and Coauthors, 2001: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)-A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 76, 143-166, doi:10.1007/s007030170027.
47. Xue, M., D.-H. Wang, J.-D. Gao, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 139-170, doi:10.1007/s00703-001-0595-6.