Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands provide ecosystem service benefits that exceed land rental payment costs

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 18, Issue , 2016, Pages 175-185

  Johnson, Kris A ^a   Dalzell, Brent J ^b   Donahue, Marie ^b   Gourevitch, Jesse ^b   Johnson, Dennis L ^c   Karlovits, Greg S ^c   Keeler, Bonnie ^b   Smith, Jason T ^c  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c U S ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Conservation reserve program; Cost benefit analysis; Ecosystem services; Valuation; Water quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962278621     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Anderson J., Beduhn R., Current D., Espeleta J., Fissore C., Gangeness B., et al. The potential for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Minnesota 2008, 74.
2. Arnold J.G., Fohrer N. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19. 10.1002/hyp.5611.
3. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part I: Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34:1. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x.
4. Asbjornsen H., Hernandez-Santa V., Liebman M., Bayala J., Chen J., Helmers M., et al. Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2014, 29:101-125.
5. Birch M.B., Gramig B.M., Moomaw W.R., Doering I., Otto C., Reeling C.J. Why metrics matter: evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the chesapeake bay watershed. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:168-174. 10.1021/es101472z.
6. Brauman K.A., Daily G.C., Duarte T.K.E., Mooney H.A. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007, 32:67-98. 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758.
7. Brender J.D., Weyer P.J., Romitti P.A., Mohanty B.P., Shinde M.U., Vuong A.M., et al. Prenatal nitrate intake from drinking water and selected birth defects in offspring of participants in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121:1083. 10.1289/ehp.1206249.
8. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2015. Consumer Price Index Inflation Calculator. U.S. Department of Labor. [cited 20 April 2015]. (Available): http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
9. Carson R.T., Mitchell R.C. The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29:2445-2454. 10.1029/93WR00495.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2014. Nitrates in Community Water Systems for Linn County, Iowa. Environmental Health Tracking Network. [cited 9 April 2015]. (Available): http://www.cdc.gov/ephtracking.
11. Chen, X., Khanna, M., 2014. Indirect Land Use Effects of Corn Ethanol in the US: Implications for the Conservation Reserve Program. In 2014 Annual Meeting, (July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, MN) (No. 170284). (Agric. and Applied Econ. Assoc).
12. Compton J.E., Harrison J.A., Dennis R.L., Greaver T.L., Hill B.H., Jordan S.J., et al. Ecosystem services altered by human changes in the nitrogen cycle: a new perspective for US decision making. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:804-815. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01631.x.
13. Cropland Data Layer (CDL), 2012. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
14. Crutchfield, S.R., Cooper, J.C., Hellerstein, D. 1997. Benefits of Safer Drinking Water: The Value of Nitrate Reduction. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
15. Dahlby B. The Marginal Cost of Public Funds. Theory and Applications 2008, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Dalzell, B., Pennington, D., Polasky, S., Mulla, D., Taff, S., Nelson, E. 2012. Lake Pepin Watershed Full Cost Accounting Project Final Report. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. [cited 18 March 2015]. Available: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=20358.
17. Davidson E., David M.B., Galloway J.N., Goodale C.L., Haeuber R., Harrison J.A., et al. Excess nitrogen in the U. S. environment: trends, risks, and solutions. Issues Ecol. 2015, 15.
18. Davis, S., Skaggs, L. 1992, Catalog of Residential Depth-Damage Functions Used by the Army Corps of Engineers in Flood Damage Estimations: IWR Report 92-R-3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources.
19. De Klein, C., Novoa, R.S., Ogle, S., Smith, K., Rochette, P., et al., 2006. N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme 4.
20. Delucchi M.A. Environmental externalities of motor-vehicle use in the US. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2000, 135-168.
21. Donner S.D., Kucharik C.J. Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:4513.
22. Farm Service Agency (FSA), 2015. Conservation Reserve Program Statistics. (Available): http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/reports-and-statistics/conservation-reserve-program-statistics/index.
23. Feather P., Hellerstein D., Hansen L. Economic valuation of environmental benefits and the targeting of conservation programs: the case of the CRP. Agricultural Economic Report 1999; No. 778, Economic Research Service, 1999, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
24. Fuka D.R., Walter M.T., MacAlister C., Degaetano A.T., Steenhuis T.S., Easton Z.M. Using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as weather input data for watershed models. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 28. 10.1002/hyp.10073.
25. Gascoigne W.R., Hoag D., Koontz L., Tangen B.A., Shaffer T.L., Gleason R.A. Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1715-1725. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.010.
26. Gassman P.W., Reyes M.R., Green C.H., Arnold J.G. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50(4):1211-1250.
27. Gelfand I., Zenone T., Poonam J., Chen J., Hamilton S.K., Robertson G.P. Carbon Debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Grasslands converted to bioenergy Production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:13864-13869.
28. Gleason R.A., Euliss N.H., Tangen B.A., Laubhan M.K., Browne B.A. USDA conservation program and practice effects on wetland ecosystem services in the Prairie Pothole Region. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:S65-S81.
29. Griffiths C., Klemick H., Massey M., Moore C., Newbold S., Simpson D., Walsh P., Wheeler W. U.S. environmental protection agency valuation of surface water quality improvements. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2012, 6:130-146. 10.1093/reep/rer025.
30. Hansen L. Conservation reserve program: environmental benefits update. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2007, 36:267-280.
31. Hansen, L.R., Ribaudo, M., 2008. Economic Measures of Soil Conservation Bene?ts: Regional Values for Policy Assessment, TB-1922. USDA, Economic Research Service, USA. [cited 3 April 2015]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/196118/tb1922.pdf.
32. Honeycutt, K., Canada, H.E., Jenkins, M.W., Lund, J.R., 2012. Alternative Water Supply Options for Nitrate Contamination Technical Report 7: Addressing Nitrate in California's Drinking Water with A Focus on Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley Groundwater. Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis. [cited 20 April 2015]. (Available): http://groundwaternitrate.ucdavis.edu/files/139108.pdf.
33. IDNR, 2015. Natural Resources Geographic Information System Library. 2015 [cited 15 March 2015]. (Available): https://programs.iowadnr.gov/nrgislibx/.
34. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, 2013. Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866. 2013 United States Government.
35. Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), 2008. Soils Requiring Tile Drainage for Full Productivity. Edition 20080923. Published by Iowa Geological and Water Survey, DNR. [cited 9 Feb 2016]. (Available): ftp://ftp.igsb.uiowa.edu/gis_library/IA_state/agriculture/tiled_soils/.
36. Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), 2013. Iowa's 2012 Listing of Clean Water Act Section 303(d) and 305(b) Impaired Streams. Natural Resources Geographic Information System Library. [cited 9 July 2015]. (Available): https://programs.iowadnr.gov/nrgislibx/.
37. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, 2015. Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa - 2015. Ag. Decision Maker. File A1-20. FM 1712. [cited 8 Feb 2016]. (Available): http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/pdf/a1-20.pdf.
38. Smith, J., Hawes, C., Karlovits, G., Eberts, III, R., 2013. Conservation Reserve Program Flood Damage Reduction Benefits to Downstream Urban Areas: Rock Island District Pilot Project Report 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley Division Initiative Technical Report for the USDA Farm Service Agency. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/fsa_pilot_report_final.pdf.
39. Jensen, V.B., Darby, J.L., Seidel, C., Gorman, C., 2012. Drinking Water Treatment for Nitrate Technical Report 6: Addressing Nitrate in California's Drinking Water with a Focus on Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley Groundwater. Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis. [cited 20 April 2015]. (Available): http://groundwaternitrate.ucdavis.edu/files/139107.pdf.
40. Johnson J.M.F., Franzluebbers A.J., Weyers S.L., Reicosky D.C. Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150:107-124.
41. Johnson K.A., Polasky S., Nelson E., Pennington D. Uncertainty in ecosystem services valuation and implications for assessing land use tradeoffs: an agricultural case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 79:71-79. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.020.
42. Johnston C.A. Agricultural expansion: land use shell game in the US Northern Plains. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 1-15.
43. Johnston R.J., Besedin E.Y. Benefits transfer and meta-analysis: estimating willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements. Environmental Economics for Watershed Restoration 2009, 95-120. CRC Press, Boca Raton. H.W. Thurston, M.T. Heberling, A. Schrecongost (Eds.).
44. Johnston R.J., Besedin E.Y., Iovanna R., Miller C.J., Wardwell R.F., Ranson M.H. Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 53:221-248. 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.04018.x.
45. Keeler B.L., Polasky S., Brauman K.A., Johnson K.A., Finlay J.C., O'Neille A., Kovacs K., Dalzell B. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:18619-18624. 10.1073/pnas.1215991109.
46. Krewski D., Andersen M.E., Mantus E., Zeise L. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment. Risk Anal. 2009, 29:474-479. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01168.x.
47. Kusiima J.M., Powers S.E. Monetary value of the environmental and health externalities associated with production of ethanol from biomass feedstocks. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2785-2796. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.010.
48. Lark T.J., Salmon J.M., Gibbs H.K. Cropland expansion outpaces agricultural and biofuel policies in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10:1-11. 10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044003.
49. Lee P., Smyth C., Boutin S. Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States. J. Environ. Manag 2004, 70:165180. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.009.
50. Lewandowski A., Montgomery B., Rosen C., Moncrief J. Groundwater nitrate contamination costs: A survey of private well owners. J. Soil. Water Conserv. 2008, 63:153-161. 10.2489/jswc.63.3.153.
51. Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., Covich A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 33:103-117.
52. 2 GHG emissions: methane and nitrous oxide. Energy Policy 2012, 51:957-972. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.073.
53. Maupin, M.A., Kenny, J.F., Hutson, S.S., Lovelace, J.K., Barber, N.L., Linsey, K.S., 2014. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1405. (Available): http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/cir1405.
54. Meehan T.D., Gratton C., Diehl E., Hunt N.D., Mooney D.F., Ventura S.J., Barham B.L., Jackson R.D. Ecosystem-service tradeoffs associated with switching from annual to perennial energy crops in riparian zones of the US midwest. PLoS One 2013, 8:e80093. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080093.
55. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van M.W., Binger R.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50:3.
56. Motovilov Y., Gottschalk L., Engeland K., Rodhe A. Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agric. Meteorol. 1999, 98-99. 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00102-1.
57. Muñoz-Carpena R., Parsons J., Gilliam J. Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips. J. Hydrol. 1999, 214:111129. 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00272-8.
58. Muller N.Z., Mendelsohn R. Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007, 54:1-14. 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002.
59. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10:282-290.
60. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Williams J.R. Soil and water. Assess. Tool. Theor. Doc. 2011, 647.
61. Olmstead S.M. The economics of water quality. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2010, 4:44-62. 10.1093/reep/rep016.
62. Drum, R.G., Loesch, C.R., Carrlson, K.M., Doherty, K.E., Fedy, B.C., 2015. Assessing the biological benefits of the USDA-Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) for Waterfowl and Grassland Passerines in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. Final Report for USDA-FSA Agreement. 12-Ia-MRE-CRP-TA; (Available): https://origin2.www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/EPAS/PDF/drumetal2015_crp_prr_final.pdf.
63. Rao M.N., Yang Z. Groundwater impacts due to conservation reserve program in Texas County, Oklahoma. Appl. Geogr. 2010, 3:317-328.
64. Robertson G.P., Paul E.A., Harwood R.R. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 2000, 289:1922-1925.
65. Schulte L.A., Liebman M., Asbjornsen H., Crow T.R. Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2006, 61:165A-169A.
66. Secchi S., Gassman P.W., Jha M., Kurkalova L., Kling C.L. Potential water quality changes due to corn expansion in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:1068-1084.
67. Shabman, L, Making benefit estimation useful: lessons from flood control experience, Water Resources Update [Universities Council on Water Resources], vol. 109, Autumn . 1997, pp. 19-24.
68. Spalding R.F., Exner M.E. Occurrence of nitrate in groundwater-a review. J. Environ. Qual. 1993, 22:392-402.
69. 2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2006, 74:207-228. 2006. 10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7.
70. M. Stubbs, Conservation Provisions in the 2014 Farm Bill 2014. CRS Report R43504.
71. Sullivan P., Hellerstein D., Hansen L., Johansson R., Koenig S., Lubowski R., et al. The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America 2004, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer834/.
72. Swinton S.M., Lupi F., Robertson G.P., Hamilton S.K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:245-252. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.020.
73. Taheripour F. Economic Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: A General Equilibrium Framework. American Agricultural Economics Association 2006, Long Beach.
74. Tol R.S. The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers and catastrophes. Econ.: Open Access, Open Assess. E-J. 2008, 2. 10.2139/ssrn.1716668.
75. Tomer M., Burkart M. Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilizer use on ground water nitrate in two small watersheds. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:2158-2171. 10.2134/jeq2003.2158.
76. Townsend A.R., Howarth R.W., Bazzaz F.A., Booth M.S., Cleveland C.C., Collinge S.K., et al. Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 1:240-246.
77. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2000. Planning Guidance Notebook 2000; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Engineer Regulation 1105-2-100. Washington, DC. http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ER_1105-2-100.pdf.
78. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2013. Estimating the benefit per ton of reducing PM2.5 precursors from 17 sectors. Technical Support Document. (Available): http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-10/documents/sourceapportionmentbpttsd.pdf.
79. Wegner G., Pascual U. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21:492-504. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.008.
80. Weyer P., Kantamneni J., Lu X., Ward M., Cerhan J. Nitrate Ingestion from drinking water and diet and cancer risk. Epidemiol 2008, 19:S55. 10.1097/01.ede.0000339692.47203.99.
81. Wright C.K., Wimberly M.C. Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:4134-4139.
82. Wu J., Lin H. The effects of the conservation reserve program on land values. Land Econ. 2010, 86:1-21.
83. Wu Y., Liu S. Modeling of land use and reservoir effects on nonpoint source pollution in a highly agricultural basin. J. Environ. Monit. 2012, 14:2350. 10.1039/c2em30278k.
84. Wu Y., Liu W., Sohl S., Young, C.J.T.L. Projecting the land cover change and its environmental impacts in the Cedar River Basin in the Midwestern United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8. 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024025.