Detection and projection of forest changes by using the Markov Chain model and cellular automata

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Vázquez Quintero, Griselda ^a   Solís Moreno, Raúl ^a   Pompa García, Marín ^a   Villarreal Guerrero, Federico ^b   Pinedo Alvarez, Carmelo ^b   Pinedo Alvarez, Alfredo ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD JUÁREZ DEL ESTADO DE DURANGO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE CHIHUAHUA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Land use changes; Landsat; Simulation; Temperate forest

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961933702     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8030236     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Cabrera, V.A.; Vilalta, M.J. Patterns of forest decline and regeneration across scots pine populations. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 323-335.
2. Chen, F.C.; Son, T.N.; Chang, B.N.; Chen, R.C.; Chang, Y.L.; Valdez, M.; Centeno, G.; Thompson, A.C.; Aceituno, L.J. Multi-decadal mangrove forest change detection and prediction in Honduras, Central America, with Landsat imagery and a Markov chain model. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 6408-6426.
3. Lambin, F.E.; Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. PNAS 2011, 108, 3465-3472.
4. Yu, X.J.; Ng, C.N. Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects A case study of Guangzhou, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79, 96-109.
5. Leuzinger, S.; Luo, Y.; Beier, C.; Dieleman, W.; Vicca, S.; Körner, C. Do global change experiments overestimate impacts on terrestrial ecosystems? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 236-241.
6. Watson, R.T.; Noble, I.R.; Bolin, B.; Ravindranath, N.H.; Verardo, D.J.; Dokken, D.J. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; p. 388.
7. Abdalla, M.; Saunders, M.; Hastings, A.; Williams, M.; Smith, P.; Osborne, B.; Lanigan, G.; Jones, M.B. Simulating the impacts of land use in Northwest Europe on Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE): The role of arable ecosystems, grasslands and forest plantations in climate change mitigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 465, 325-336.
8. Dale, V.H. The relationship between land-use change and climate change. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7, 753-769.
9. Villers, R.L.; Trejo, V. Assessment of the vulnerability of forest ecosystem to climate change in Mexico. Clim. Res. 1997, 9, 87-93.
10. Mansera, O.; Ordóñez, M.J.; Dirzo, R. Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: Current situation and long-term scenarios. Clim. Change 1997, 35, 265-295.
11. Grimm, N.B.; Grove, J.M.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Redman, C.L. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 2000, 50, 571-584.
12. González, E.M.S.; González, E.M.; Tena, F.A.; González, R.L.; López, E.L. Vegetación de la sierra madre occidental, México: Una síntesis. Acta Bot. Mex. 2012, 100, 351-403.
13. Potter, S.C. Terrestrial biomass and the effects of deforestation on the global carbon cycle results from a model of primary production using satellite observation. Bioscience 1999, 49, 769-778.
14. Manjarrez-Domínguez, C.; Pinedo-Alvarez, A.; Pinedo-Alvarez, C.; Villarreal-Guerrero, F.; Cortes-Palacios, L. Vegetation landscape analysis due to land use changes on arid lands. Pol. J. Ecol. 2015, 63, 272-279.
15. Turner, M. Landscape ecology in North America: Past, present and future. Ecology 2005, 86, 1967-1974.
16. Bormann, F.H.; Likens, G.E. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem, 1st ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1994; p. 245.
17. Kabba, S.T.V.; Li, J. Analysis of land use and land cover changes, and their ecological implications in Wuhan, China. J. Geogr. Geol. 2011, 3, 104-118.
18. Pal, M.; Mather, P.M. Assessment of the effectiveness of support vector machines for hyperspectral data. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2004, 20, 1215-1225.
19. Hansen, M.C.; Loveland, T.R. A review of large are monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 122, 66-74.
20. Tang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S. Investigating landscape pattern and its dynamics in Daqing, China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 2259-2280.
21. Read, J.M.; Lam, N.S. Spatial methods for characterizing land cover and detecting land-cover changes for the tropics. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 2457-2474.
22. Coppin, P.; Jonckheere, I.; Nackaerts, K.; Muys, B.; Lambin, E. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 1565-1596.
23. Bolstad, P.; Lillesand, T.M. Rapid maximum likelihood classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1991, 57, 67-74.
24. Franklin, J.; Woodcock, C.E.; Warbington, R. Multi-attribute vegetation maps of forest services lands in California supporting resource management decisions. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 2000, 66, 1209-1217.
25. Mas, J.F.; Flores, J.J. The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 617-663.
26. Lin, Y.P.; Chu, H.J.;Wu, C.F.; Verburg, P.H. Predictive ability of logistic regression, auto-logistic regression and neural network models in empirical land-use change modeling-A case study. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2011, 25, 65-87.
27. Brown, D.G.; Page, S.; Riolo, R.; Zellner, M.; Rand, W. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2005, 19, 153-174.
28. Dewan, A.M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Rahman, M.Z. Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka Metropolitan, Bangladesh. GeoJournal 2012, 77, 315-330.
29. Guild, L.; Cohen, W.; Kauffman, J. Detection of deforestation and land conversion in Bondonia, Brazil using change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 731-750.
30. Pinedo, A.C.; Pinedo, A.A.; Martinez, Q.R.M. Analysis of deforested areas in the north central region of the Sierra Madre Occidental, Chihuahua, México. Tecnociencia Chihuahua 2007, 1, 36-43.
31. Yuan, D.; Elvidge, C. NALC land cover change detection pilot study: Washington DC data experiments. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 66, 166-178.
32. Verhagen, P. Case Studies in Archaeological Predictive Modeling; Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; p. 224.
33. Lambin, E.F. Modelling Deforestation Processes: A Review; Office for Official Publications of the European Community: Brussels, Belgium, 1994.
34. Glenn, D.C.; Lewin, R.K.; Peet, T.T.V. Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992.
35. Hu, Z.; Lo, C. Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2007, 31, 667-688.
36. Cabral, P.; Zamyatin, A. Markov Processes in Modeling Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Sintra-Cascais, Portugal. Dyna 2009, 191-198.
37. Liu, Y. Modelling Urban Development with Geographical Information Systems and Cellular Automata; Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2009; p. 177.
38. Lepš, J. Mathematical modelling of ecological succesion-A review. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 1988, 23, 79-94.
39. Arsanjani, J.J.; Kainz, W.; Mousivand, A.J. Tracking dynamic land-use change using spatially explicit Markov Chain based on cellular automata: The case of Tehran. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 2011, 2, 329-345.
40. Camacho, O.M.T.; Pontius, R.G., Jr.; Paegelow, M.; Mas, J.F. Comparison of simulation models in terms of quantity and allocation of land chance. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 69, 214-221.
41. Yang, X.; Zheng, X.-Q.; Lv, L.N. A spatiotemporal model of land use change based on ant colony optimization, Markov chain and cellular automata. Ecol. Model. 2012, 233, 11-19.
42. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática) 2012-Información Nacional, por Entidad Federativa y Municipios. Available online: www.inegi.org.mx/(accessed on 24 February 2016). (in Spanish).
43. Richards, J.A.; Jia, X. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction, 4th ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2006; p. 439.
44. Eastman, J.R.; Van Fossen, M.E.; Solarzano, L.A. Transition Potential Modeling for Land Cover Change. In GIS, Analysis, Spatial, Modeling; Maguire, D.J., Goodchild, M.F., Batty, M., Eds.; ESRI Press: Redlands, CA, USA, 2005; p. 386.
45. Mitsova, D.; Shuster, W.;Wang, X. A cellular automata model of land cover change to integrate urban growth with open space conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 99, 141-153.
46. Bhattacharyya, A. On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 1943, 35, 99-109.
47. Eastman, R.; Idrisi, T. Guide to GIS and Image Processing, Manual Version 16.02; Clark University: Worcester, MA, USA, 2009; p. 342.
48. Smits, P.C.; Dellepiane, S.G.; Schowengerdt, R.A. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1999, 20, 1461-1486.
49. Congalton, R.G.; Oderwald, R.G.; Mead, R.A. Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1983, 49, 1671-1678.
50. Mousivand, A.J.; Alimohammadi, S.A.; Shayan, S. A New Approach of Predicting Land Use and Land Cover Changes by Satellite Imagery and Markov chain model (Case study: Tehran). Ph.D. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, 2007.
51. Benenson, I.; Torrens, P.M. Geosimulation: Automata-Based Modeling of Urban Phenomena;Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2004; pp. 1-287.
52. Strigul, N.; Florescu, I.;Welden, R.A.; Michalczewski, F. Modelling of forest stand dynamics using Markov chains. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 31, 64-65.
53. Clark Labs. IDRISI Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing Software; Clark Labs: Worcester, MA, USA, 2006.
54. Wolfram, S. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature 1984, 311, 419-424.
55. Vazquez, Q.G.; Pinedo, A.A.; Manjarrez, D.C.; De Leon, M.G.; Hernandez, R.A. Analysis of temperate forest fragmentation using spatial medium-resolution remote sensing in Pueblo Nuevo, Durango. Tecnociencia Chihuahua 2013, 7, 88-98.
56. Renteria, A.B.; Treviño, G.E.; Navar, C.J.; Aguirre, C.O.; Silva, C.I. Woody fuel assessment in the ejido Pueblo Nuevo, Durango. Rev. Chapingo 2005, 11, 51-56.
57. Pompa, G.M.; Zapata, M.M.; Hernandez, D.C.; Rodriguez, T.E. Geospatial model as strategy to prevent forest fires: A case study. J. Environ. Prot. 2012, 3, 1034-1038.
58. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization. State of theWorld's Forest. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3010e/i3010e.pdf(accessed on 24 February 2016 2016).