Integration of renewable generation uncertainties into stochastic unit commitment considering reserve and risk: A comparative study

Energy

Volumn 103, Issue , 2016, Pages 735-745

  Quan, Hao ^a   Srinivasan, Dipti ^a   Khosravi, Abbas ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Renewable generation; Risk assessment; Scenario generation; Uncertainty; Unit commitment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SOLAR ENERGY; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

COMPARATIVE SIMULATION; FORECAST UNCERTAINTY; RENEWABLE GENERATION; SCENARIO GENERATION; STOCHASTIC SECURITY CONSTRAINED UNIT COMMITMENTS; STOCHASTIC UNIT COMMITMENTS; UNCERTAINTY; UNIT-COMMITMENT;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; POWER GENERATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOLAR POWER; STOCHASTICITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84961927121     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Osório G., Lujano-Rojas J., Matias J., Catalão J. A probabilistic approach to solve the economic dispatch problem with intermittent renewable energy sources. Energy 2015, 82:949-959.
2. Quan H., Srinivasan D., Khosravi A. Uncertainty handling using neural network-based prediction intervals for electrical load forecasting. Energy 2014, 73:916-925.
3. Petković D., Shamshirband S., Anuar N.B., Saboohi H., Wahab A.W.A., Protić M., et al. An appraisal of wind speed distribution prediction by soft computing methodologies: a comparative study. Energy Convers Manag 2014, 84:133-139.
4. Piri J., Shamshirband S., Petković D., Tong C.W., ur Rehman M.H. Prediction of the solar radiation on the earth using support vector regression technique. Infrared Phys Technol 2015, 68:179-185.
5. Quan H., Srinivasan D., Khosravi A. Incorporating wind power forecast uncertainties into stochastic unit commitment using neural network-based prediction intervals. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2015, 26(9):2123-2135.
6. Matos M.A., Bessa R.J. Setting the operating reserve using probabilistic wind power forecasts. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011, 26(2):594-603.
7. Zhang Y., Wang J., Wang X. Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014, 32:255-270.
8. Chatfield C. Calculating interval forecasts. J Bus Econ Stat 1993, 11(2):121-135.
9. Liang R.-H., Liao J.-H. A fuzzy-optimization approach for generation scheduling with wind and solar energy systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2007, 22(4):1665-1674.
10. Venkatesh B., Yu P., Gooi H., Choling D. Fuzzy MILP unit commitment incorporating wind generators. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008, 23(4):1738-1746.
11. Petković D., Ćojbašić Ž., Nikolić V., Shamshirband S., Kiah M.L.M., Anuar N.B., et al. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy maximal power extraction of wind turbine with continuously variable transmission. Energy 2014, 64:868-874.
12. Jiang R., Wang J., Guan Y. Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012, 27(2):800-810.
13. Bertsimas D., Litvinov E., Sun X., Zhao J., Zheng T. Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013, 28(1):52-63.
14. Jiang R., Wang J., Zhang M., Guan Y. Two-stage minimax regret robust unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013, 28(3):2271-2282.
15. Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Chance-constrained programming. Manag Sci 1959, 6(1):73-79.
16. Ozturk U.A., Mazumdar M., Norman B.A. A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2004, 19(3):1589-1598.
17. Wang Q., Guan Y., Wang J. A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012, 27(1):206-215.
18. Zhao J., Wen F., Dong Z.Y., Xue Y., Wong K.P. Optimal dispatch of electric vehicles and wind power using enhanced particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2012, 8(4):889-899.
19. Wu L., Shahidehpour M., Li Z. Comparison of scenario-based and interval optimization approaches to stochastic SCUC. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012, 27(2):913-921.
20. Wang J., Shahidehpour M., Li Z. Security-constrained unit commitment with volatile wind power generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008, 23(3):1319-1327.
21. Ortega-Vazquez M.A., Kirschen D.S. Estimating the spinning reserve requirements in systems with significant wind power generation penetration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2009, 24(1):114-124.
22. Niknam T., Azizipanah-Abarghooee R., Narimani M.R. An efficient scenario-based stochastic programming framework for multi-objective optimal micro-grid operation. Appl Energy 2012, 99:455-470.
23. Ma X.-Y., Sun Y.-Z., Fang H.-L. Scenario generation of wind power based on statistical uncertainty and variability. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2013, 4(4):894-904.
24. Pinson P., Madsen H., Nielsen H.A., Papaefthymiou G., Klöckl B. From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production. Wind Energy 2009, 12(1):51-62.
25. Makarov Y., Etingov P., Ma J., Huang Z., Subbarao K. Incorporating uncertainty of wind power generation forecast into power system operation, dispatch, and unit commitment procedures. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2011, 2(4):433-442.
26. Billinton R., Huang D. Effects of load forecast uncertainty on bulk electric system reliability evaluation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008, 23(2):418-425.
27. Ongsakul W., Petcharaks N. Unit commitment by enhanced adaptive Lagrangian relaxation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2004, 19(1):620-628.
28. Kazarlis S., Bakirtzis A., Petridis V. A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1996, 11(1):83-92.
29. Lee K.Y., Cha Y.T., Park J.H. Short-term load forecasting using an artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1992, 7(1):124-132.
30. Quan H., Srinivasan D., Khosravi A. Short-term load and wind power forecasting using neural network-based prediction intervals. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2014, 25(2):303-315.
31. Khosravi A., Nahavandi S., Creighton D., Atiya A.F. Lower upper bound estimation method for construction of neural network-based prediction intervals. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2011, 22(3):337-346.
32. Shumway R., Stoffer D. Time series analysis and its applications: with R examples 2010, Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.
33. Wind power/AIL data 2014, URL:. http://www.aeso.ca/gridoperations/20544.html.
34. Pinson P., Kariniotakis G. Conditional prediction intervals of wind power generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2010, 25(4):1845-1856.
35. Raychaudhuri S. Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation. Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2008 2008, 91-100.
36. UO solar radiation monitoring laboratory 2014, URL:. http://solardat.uoregon.edu/index.html.
37. Wood A.J., Wollenberg B.F. Power generation, operation, and control 1996, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38. Takriti S., Birge J.R., Long E. A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1996, 11(3):1497-1508.
39. Yuan X., Su A., Nie H., Yuan Y., Wang L. Application of enhanced discrete differential evolution approach to unit commitment problem. Energy Convers Manag 2009, 50(9):2449-2456.
40. Cheng C.-P., Liu C.-W., Liu C.-C. Unit commitment by lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2000, 15(2):707-714.
41. Datta D., Dutta S. A binary-real-coded differential evolution for unit commitment problem. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2012, 42(1):517-524.
42. Wang J., Botterud A., Miranda V., Monteiro C., Sheble G. Impact of wind power forecasting on unit commitment and dispatch. Proc. 8th Int. Workshop Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power Into Power Systems 2009, 1-8. Germany, Bremen.
43. Li W. Risk assessment of power systems: models, methods, and applications 2014, John Wiley & Sons.
44. Xiong G., Liu X., Hashiyama T. Stochastic unit commitment problem considering risk constraints and its improved GA-based solution method. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng 2013, 8(5):463-469.
45. Srinivasan D., Chazelas J. A priority list-based evolutionary algorithm to solve large scale unit commitment problem. Proc. Int. Conf. Power System Technology 2004, vol. 2:1746-1751.
46. Quan H., Srinivasan D., Khosravi A. Particle swarm optimization for construction of neural network-based prediction intervals. Neurocomputing 2014, 127:172-180.
47. Logenthiran T., Srinivasan D. Particle swarm optimization for unit commitment problem. Proc. IEEE PMAPS 2010, 642-647.
48. Chen P.-H. Two-level hierarchical approach to unit commitment using expert system and elite PSO. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012, 27(2):780-789.