Wealth, fertility and adaptive behaviour in industrial populations

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 371, Issue 1692, 2016, Pages

  Stulp, Gert ^a   Barrett, Louise ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fitness; Human behavioural ecology; Income; Industrial society; Mismatch

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FERTILITY; FITNESS; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; INCOME; LITERATURE REVIEW;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECONOMICS; FAMILY SIZE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ECONOMICS; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FERTILITY; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84961875466     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0153     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Austen J. 1813 Pride and prejudice. London, UK: T. Egerton. (Reprinted by Penguin 2006.)
2. Vining DR. 1986 Social versus reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behav. Brain Sci. 9, 167-187. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X00021968)
3. Pérusse D. 1993 Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behav. Brain Sci. 16, 267-283. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X00029939)
4. Irons W. 1979 Cultural and biological success. In Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: an anthropological perspective (eds NA Chagnon, W Irons), pp. 257-272. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
5. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1987 On cultural and reproductive success: Kipsigis evidence. Am. Anthropol. 89, 617-634. (doi:10.1525/aa.1987.89.3.02a00050)
6. Hopcroft RL. 2006 Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 104-120. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004)
7. Nettle D, Pollet TV. 2008 Natural selection on male wealth in humans. Am. Nat. 172, 658-666. (doi:10.1086/591690)
8. von Rueden C, Gurven M, Kaplan H. 2011 Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2223-2232. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2145)
9. Borgerhoff Mulder M, Beheim BA. 2011 Understanding the nature of wealth and its effects on human fitness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 344-356. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0231)
10. Myrskyla¨ M, Kohler H-P, Billari FC. 2009 Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460, 741-743. (doi:10.1038/nature08230)
11. Stulp G, Sear R, Schaffnit SB, Mills M, Barrett L. In press. The reproductive ecology of industrial societies: the association between wealth and fertility. Hum. Nat.
12. Colleran H, Jasienska G, Nenko I, Galbarczyk A, Mace R. 2015 Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status and inequality. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150287. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0287)
13. Bookstein FL. 1993 Converting cultural success into mating failure by aging. Behav. Brain Sci. 16, 285-286. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X00029964)
14. Becker GS. 1960 An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries, pp. 209-240. National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1998 The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 266-270. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01357-3)
16. Draper P. 1989 African marriage systems: perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Ethol. Sociobiol. 10, 145-169. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(89)90017-4)
17. Turke PW. 1989 Evolution and the demand for children. Popul. Dev. Rev. 15, 61-90. (doi:10.2307/1973405)
18. Bereczkei T. 1998 Kinship network, direct childcare, and fertility among Hungarians and gypsies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19, 283-298. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00027-0)
19. Newson L, Postmes T, Lea SEG, Webley P. 2005 Why are modern families small? Toward an evolutionary and cultural explanation for the demographic transition. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 9, 360-375. (doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_5)
20. Turke PW. 1990 Which humans behave adaptively, and why does it matter? Ethol. Sociobiol. 11, 305-339. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(90)90013-V)
21. Leibenstein H. 1975 The economic theory of fertility decline. Q. J. Econ. 122, 1-31. (doi:10.2307/1881706)
22. Easterlin RA. 1973 Relative economic status and the American fertility swings. In Family economic behavior: problems and prospects (ed. EB Sheldon), pp. 170-227. Philadelphia, PA: Lippin-Scott.
23. Richerson PJ, Boyd R. 2005 Not by genes alone— how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. Mace R. 2007 The evolutionary ecology of human family size. In Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (eds RIM Dunbar, L Barrett), pp. 382-396. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Hill SE, Reeve HK. 2005 Low fertility in humans as the evolutionary outcome of snowballing resource games. Behav. Ecol. 16, 398-402. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ari001)
26. Rogers AR. 1990 Evolutionary economics of human reproduction. Ethol. Sociobiol. 11, 479-495. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(90)90022-X)
27. Beauchamp G. 1994 The functional analysis of human fertility decisions. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15, 31-53. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90026-4)
28. Mace R. 1998 The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 389-397. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0217)
29. Rogers AR. 1995 For love or money: the evolution of reproductive and material motivations. In Human reproductive decisions (ed. RIM Dunbar), pp. 76-95. London, UK: Macmillan.
30. Boone JL, Kessler KL. 1999 More status or more children? Social status, fertility reduction, and longterm fitness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20, 257-277. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00011-2)
31. Goodman A, Koupil I, Lawson DW. 2012 Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern postindustrial society. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4342-4351.(doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1415)
32. Kaplan H. 1996 A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 101, 91-135. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(1996)23+,91::AIDAJPA4.3.0.CO;2-C)
33. Becker GS, Lewis HG. 1974 Interaction between the quantity and quality of children. In Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital (ed. TW Schultz), pp. 81-90. National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Stearns SC. 1992 The evolution of life histories. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Walker RS, Gurven M, Burger O, Hamilton MJ. 2008 The trade-off between number and size of offspring in humans and other primates. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 827-833. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1511)
36. Lawson DW, Mace R. 2011 Parental investment and the optimization of human family size. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 333-343. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0297)
37. Kaplan H, Lancaster JB, Tucker WT, Anderson KG. 2002 Evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14, 233-256. (doi:10.1002/ajhb.10041)
38. Shenk MK, Kaplan HS, Hooper PL. 2016 Status competition, inequality, and fertility: implications for the demographic transition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150150. (doi:10.1098.rstb.2015.0150)
39. Lawson DW, Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2016 The offspring quantity-quality trade-off and human fertility variation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150145. (doi:10.1098.rstb.2015.0145)
40. Snopkowski K, Kaplan H. 2014 A synthetic biosocial model of fertility transition: testing the relative contribution of embodied capital theory, changing cultural norms, and women’s labor force participation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 154, 322-333. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.22512)
41. Braveman P, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Marchi KS, Metzler M. 2013 Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA 294, 2879-2888. (doi:10.1001/jama.294.22.2879)
42. Borgerhoff Mulder M et al. 2009 Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science 326, 682-688. (doi:10.1126/science.1178336)
43. Weeden J, Abrams M, Green M, Sabini J. 2006 Do highstatus people really have fewer children? Hum. Nat. 17, 377-392. (doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1001-3)
44. Hopcroft RL. 2014 Sex differences in the relationship between status and number of offspring in the contemporary U.S. Evol. Hum. Behav. 36, 146-151. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.003)
45. Fieder M, Huber S. 2007 The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 392-398. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.004)
46. Fieder M, Huber S, Bookstein FL. 2011 Socioeconomic status, marital status and childlessness in men and women: an analysis of census data from six countries. J. Biosoc. Sci. 43, 619-635. (doi:10.1017/S002193201100023X)
47. Barthold JA, Myrskyla¨ M, Jones OR. 2012 Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 33, 628-638. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.03.003)
48. Joshi H. 1990 The cash opportunity costs of childbearing: an approach to estimation using British data. Popul. Stud. 44, 41-60. (doi:10.1080/0032472031000144376)
49. Modena F, Rondinelli C, Sabatini F. 2014 Economic insecurity and fertility intentions: the case of Italy. Rev. Income Wealth 60, S233-S255. (doi:10.1111/roiw.12044)
50. Killewald A. 2012 A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78, 96-116. (doi:10.1177/0003122412469204)
51. Blossfeld H-P, Huinink J. 1991 Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. Am. J. Sociol. 97, 143. (doi:10.1086/229743)
52. Werding M. 2014 Children are costly, but raising them may pay: the economic approach to fertility. Demogr. Res. 30, 253-276. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.8)
53. Alvergne A, Lummaa V. 2014 Ecological variation in wealth-fertility relationships in Mongolia: the ‘central theoretical problem of sociobiology’ not a problem after all? Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141733. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1733)
54. Namboodiri NK. 1972 Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis. Popul. Stud. 26, 185-206. (doi:10.1080/00324728.1972.10405545)
55. Skirbekk V. 2008 Fertility trends by social status. Demogr. Res. 18, 145-180. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.5)
56. Testa MR. 2014 On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individualand country-level evidence. Adv. Life Course Res. 21, 28-42. (doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.005)
57. Hays S. 1996 The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58. Edin K, Kefalas MJ. 2005 Promises I can keep: why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
59. Semyonov M, Lewin-Epstein N. 2013 Ways to richness: determination of household wealth in 16 countries. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 29, 1134-1148. (doi:10.1093/esr/jct001)
60. Freedman R, Coombs L. 1966 Economic considerations in family growth decisions. Popul. Stud. 20, 197-222. (doi:10.1080/00324728.1966.10406094)
61. Freedman DS, Thornton A. 1982 Income and fertility: the elusive relationship. Demography 19, 65-78. (doi:10.2307/2061129)
62. Andersson G, Scott K. 2005 Labour-market status and first-time parenthood: the experience of immigrant women in Sweden, 1981-97. Popul. Stud. 59, 21-38. (doi:10.1080/0032472052000332683)
63. Grogan L. 2006 An economic examination of the post-transition fertility decline in Russia. Post-Communist Econ. 18, 363-397. (doi:10.1080/14631370601008415)
64. Musick K, England P, Edgington S, Kangas N. 2009 Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Soc. Forces 88, 543-572. (doi:10.1353/sof.0.0278)
65. Craig L, Siminksi P. 2010 Men’s housework, women’s housework, and second births in Australia. Soc. Polit. 17, 235-266. (doi:10.1093/sp/jxq004)
66. Kumo K. 2010 Determinants of childbirth in Russia: a micro-data approach. Glob. COE Hi-Stat Discuss. Pap. Ser. 104. Tokyo, Japan: Hitotsubashi University. See https://core.ac.uk/download/files/153/6486745.pdf.
67. Dribe M, Stanfors M. 2010 Family life in power couples: continued childbearing and union stability among the educational elite in Sweden, 1991-2005. Demogr. Res. 23, 847-878. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.30)
68. Santarelli E. 2011 Economic resources and the first child in Italy: a focus on income and job stability. Demogr. Res. 25, 311-336. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.9)
69. Remes H, Martikainen P, Valkonen T. 2011 The effects of family type on child mortality. Eur. J. Public Health 21, 688-693. (doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq159)
70. Scott K, Stanfors M. 2011 The transition to parenthood among the second generation: evidence from Sweden, 1990-2005. Adv. Life Course Res. 16, 190-204. (doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2011.09.003)
71. Waynforth D. 2012 Grandparental investment and reproductive decisions in the longitudinal 1970 British cohort study. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1155-1160. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1424)
72. Stanfors M. 2014 Fertility and the fast-track. Demogr. Res. 31, 421-460. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.15)
73. Kravdal O. 2001 The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: an artefact of the separate modelling of each parity transition. Demogr. Res. 5, 187-216. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2001.5.6)
74. Stulp G, Sear R, Barrett L. In press. The reproductive ecology of industrial societies: why measuring fertility matters. Hum. Nat.
75. Kaldager Hart R. 2015 Earnings and first birth probability among Norwegian men and women 1995-2010. Demogr. Res. 33, 1067-1104. (doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.38)
76. Balbo N, Billari FC, Mills M. 2013 Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. Eur. J. Popul. 29, 1-38. (doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y)
77. Rindfuss RR, Guilkey DK, Morgan SP, Kravdal Ø. 2010 Child-care availability and fertility in Norway. Popul. Dev. Rev. 36, 725-748. (doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x)
78. Esping-Andersen G, Billari FC. 2015 Re-theorizing family demographics. Popul. Dev. Rev. 41, 1-31. (doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x)
79. Nancy F. 1994 Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. London, UK: Routledge.
80. Stone P. 2008 Opting out: why women really quit careers and head home. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
81. Berrington A, Pattaro S. 2014 Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: a life course perspective. Adv. Life Course Res. 21, 10-27. (doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2013.12.003)
82. Humphries J. 2010 Childhood and child labour in the British industrial revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83. Colleran H. 2016 The cultural evolution of fertility decline. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150152. (doi:10.1098.rstb.2015.0152)
84. Blake J. 1968 Are babies consumer durables? A critique of the economic theory of reproductive motivation. Popul. Stud. 22, 5-25. (doi:10.2307/2173350)
85. Folbre N. 1994 Children as public goods. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 86-90. (doi:10.2307/2117807)
86. Morgan SP, King R. 2001 Why have children in the 21st century? Biological predisposition, social coercion, rational choice. Eur. J. Popul. Rev. Eur. Demographie 17, 3-20. (doi:10.1023/A:1010784028474)
87. Margolis R, Myrskyla¨ M. 2015 Parental well-being surrounding first birth as a determinant of further parity progression. Demography 52, 1147-1166. (doi:10.1007/s13524-015-0413-2)
88. Sobotka T, Beaujouan E. 2014 Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Popul. Dev. Rev. 40, 391-419. (doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x)
89. Bongaarts J. 2001 Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Popul. Dev. Rev. 27, 260-281. (doi:10.2307/3115260)
90. Angrist JD, Evans W. 1998 Children and their parent’s labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Am. Econ. Rev. 88, 450-477.
91. Hruschka DJ, Burger O. 2016 How does variance in fertility change over the demographic transition? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150155. (doi:10.1098.rstb.2015.0155)
92. Freedman DS. 1963 The relation of economic status to fertility. Am. Econ. Rev. 53, 414-426.
93. David PA, Sanderson WC. 1987 The emergence of a two-child norm among American birthcontrollers. Popul. Dev. Rev. 13, 1-41. (doi:10.2307/1972119)
94. Essock-Vitale SM. 1984 The reproductive success of wealthy Americans. Ethol. Sociobiol. 5, 45-49. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(84)90034-7)
95. Pollet TV, Pratt SE, Edwards G, Stulp G. 2013 The golden years: men from the Forbes 400 have much younger wives when remarrying than the general US population. Lett. Evol. Behav. Sci. 4, 5-8. (doi:10.5178/lebs.2013.25)
96. Graber R. 1989 A population-pressure alternative to a sociobiological theory of the rise of escalatory intergroup competition. Polit. Life Sci. 7, 203-206.
97. Vining DR. 2011 Sociobiology’s relevance to modern society: commentary on two articles published here. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32, 364-367. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.04.003)
98. Cooper M. 2014 Cut adrift: families in insecure times. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
99. Johnson-Hanks J. 2005 When the future decidesuncertainty and intentional action in contemporary Cameroon. Curr. Anthropol. 46, 363-385. (doi:10.1086/428799)
100. Mace R. 2008 Reproducing in cities. Science 319, 764-766. (doi:10.1126/science.1153960)
101. Pollet TV, Stulp G, Henzi SP, Barrett L. 2015 Taking the aggravation out of data aggregation: a conceptual guide to dealing with statistical issues related to the pooling of individual-level observational data. Am. J. Primatol. 77, 727-740. (doi:10.1002/ajp.22405)
102. Cashdan E (ed.) 1990 Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant economies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
103. Winterhalder B. 2007 Risk and decision-making. In Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (eds RIM Dunbar, L Barrett), pp. 433-445. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
104. Gurven M, Jaeggi AV, von Rueden CR, Hooper PL, Kaplan H. 2015 Does market integration buffer risk, erode traditional sharing practices, and increase inequality? A test among Bolivian forager-farmers. Hum. Ecol. 43, 515-530. (doi:10.1007/s10745-015-9764-y)
105. Beck U. 1992 Risk society: towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage.
106. Blossfeld H-P, Klijzing E, Mills M, Kurz K (eds). 2005 Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London, UK: Routledge Advances in Sociology Series.
107. van de Walle E. 1992 Fertility transition, conscious choice, and numeracy. Demography 29, 487. (doi:10.2307/2061848)
108. Heyes C. 2012 Grist and mills: on the cultural origins of cultural learning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2181-2191. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0120)
109. Symons D. 1986 Sociobiology and Darwinism. Behav. Brain Sci. 9, 208-209.
110. Irons W. 1998 Adaptively relevant environments versus the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Evol. Anthropol. 6, 194-204. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:6,194::AIDEVAN2.3.0.CO;2-B)
111. Laland KN, Brown GR. 2006 Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. Issues, News, Rev. 15, 95-104. (doi:10.1002/evan.20093)
112. Burnside WR, Brown JH, Burger O, Hamilton MJ, Moses M, Bettencourt LMA. 2012 Human macroecology: linking pattern and process in bigpicture human ecology. Biol. Rev. 87, 194-208. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00192.x)
113. Burger O, DeLong JP, Hamilton MJ. 2011 Industrial energy use and the human life history. Sci. Rep. 1, 1-7. (doi:10.1038/srep00056)
114. Colleran H, Jasienska G, Nenko I, Galbarczyk A, Mace R. 2014 Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline. Proc. R. Soc. B. 281, 20132732. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2732)
115. Colleran H, Mace R. 2015 Social network-and community-level influences on contraceptive use? evidence from rural Poland. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150398. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0398)