Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1337-1343

  Ramji, Karim M ^a   Cleghorn, Michelle C ^b   Josse, Jonathan M ^a   MacNeill, Andrea ^c   O’Brien, Catherine ^a,b,c   Urbach, David ^a,b   Quereshy, Fayez A ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cost; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; Robotics

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CENTER; CANCER SURGERY; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM SURGERY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; COLON RESECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84961782059     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4390-8     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726
2. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) COlorectal cancer laparoscopic or open resection II (COLOR II) study group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218
3. Kanji A, Gill RS, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S (2011) Robotic-assisted colon and rectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 7(4):401–407
4. Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison—open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257(1):95–101
5. Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, Nussbaum DP, Mantyh CR, Migaly J (2014) Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001017
6. Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261(1):129–137
7. Porpiglia F, Morra I, LucciChiarissi M, Manfredi M, Mele F, Grande S, Ragni F, Poggio M, Fiori C (2013) Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 63(4):606–614
8. Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36(11):2722–2729