Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 262, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1040-1045

  Speicher, Paul J ^a   Englum, Brian R ^a   Ganapathi, Asvin M ^a   Nussbaum, Daniel P ^a   Mantyh, Christopher R ^a   Migaly, John ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness; Low anterior resection; National Cancer Data Base; Oncologic outcomes; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TUMOR VOLUME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT READMISSION; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84948715605     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001017     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480-1487.
2. Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastro-intest Surg. 2014;18:816-830.
3. Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI, Ballantyne GH, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1521-1525.
4. Baek SJ, Al-Asari S, Jeong DH, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4157-4163.
5. Casillas Ma, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, et al. Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. Am J Surg. 2014;208:33-40.
6. Keller DS, Hashemi L, Lu M, et al. Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217: 1063.e1-1069.e1.
7. Saklani AP, Lim DR, Hur H, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:1689-1698.
8. Nussbaum DP, Speicher PJ, Ganapathi AM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:124-131.
9. Krane MK, Fichera A. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: where dowestand? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:6747-6755.
10. Nandakumar G, Fleshman JW. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010;19:793-802.
11. Antoniou Sa, Antoniou Ga, Koch OO, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1-11.
12. Fernandez R, Anaya Da, Li LT, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population. Am J Surg. 2013;206: 509-517.
13. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg. 2013;37:2782-2790.
14. Wormer Ba, Dacey KT, Williams KB, et al. The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:767-776.