Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 105-115

  Bohan, David A ^a   Landuyt, Dries ^b   Ma, Athen ^c   Macfadyen, Sarina ^d   Martinet, Vincent ^e   Massol, François ^f   McInerny, Greg ^g   Montoya, Jose M ^h   Mulder, Christian ⁱ   Pascual, Unai ^j,k   Pocock, Michael J O ^l   White, Piran ^m   Blanchemanche, Sandrine ^e   Bonkowski, Michael ⁿ   Bretagnolle, Vincent ^o   Brönmark, Christer ^p   Dicks, Lynn ^k   Dumbrell, Alex ^q   Eisenhauer, Nico ^r,s   Friberg, Nikolai ^t   Gessner, Mark O ^u   Gill, Richard J ^v   Gray, Clare ^v   Haughton, Alison ^w   Ibanez, Sebastien ^x   Jensen, John ^y   Jeppesen, Erik ^y   Jokela, Jukka ^z   Lacroix, Gerard ^aa   Lannou, Christian ^ab   Lavorel, Sandra ^ac   Le Galliard, Jean Francǫis ^aa   Lescourret, Françoise ^ad   Liu, Shanlin ^ae   Loeuille, Nicolas ^af   McLaughlin, Orla ^a   Muggleton, Stephen ^v   Peñuelas, Josep ^ag,ah   Petanidou, Theodora ^ai   Petit, Sandrine ^a   Pomati, Francesco ^z   Raffaelli, Dave ^m   Rasmussen, Jes ^aj   Raybould, Alan ^ak   Reboud, Xavier ^a   Richard, Guy ^al   Christoph, ^am,an   Scheu, Stefan ^am   Sutherland, William J ^k   Tamaddoni Nezhad, Alireza ^v   Ter Braak, Cajo ^ao   Termansen, Mette ^y   Thompson, Murray S A ^v   Tscharntke, Teja ^am   Vacher, Corinne ^ap   van der Geest, Harm ^aq   Voigt, Winfried ^ar   Arie Vonk, J ^aq   Zhou, Xin ^ae   Woodward, Guy ^v   more..

^a UNIV BOURGOGNE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d CSIRO   (Australia)

^e INRA ALISS   (France)

^f Univ Lille   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^h CNRS   (France)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^j BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^l CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^m UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^o CENTRE D ETUDES BIOLOGIQUES DE CHIZÉ   (France)

^p LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^q UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^r GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^s UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^t NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESEARCH   (Norway)

^u IGB Neuglobsow   (Germany)

^v IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^w ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^x UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^y AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^z SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^aa ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^ab INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^ac UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^ad Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

^ae BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^af UPMC University Paris 06   (France)

^ag UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^ah CREAF   (Spain)

^ai UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^aj CREAF ^*  (Denmark)

^ak JEALOTT S HILL RESEARCH STATION   (United Kingdom)

^al CEMAGREF   (France)

^am UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^an UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^ao WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^ap UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^aq UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^ar FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL THEORY;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHENOMENA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84961755767     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Synthesis 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press.
2. Carpenter S.R., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:1305-1312.
3. Daily G.C., et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:21-28.
4. Raudsepp-Hearne C., et al. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. BioScience 2010, 60:576-589.
5. IPBES Draft Work Programme 2014-2018 2013, Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES.
6. Silvertown J. Have ecosystem services been oversold?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015, 30:641-648.
7. Schröter M., et al. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Cons. Lett. 2014, 7:514-523.
8. Naeem S., et al. Get the science right when paying for nature's services. Science 2015, 347:1206-1207.
9. Biggs N., et al. Graph Theory 1986, Oxford University Press.
10. Mashaghi A.R., et al. Investigation of a protein complex network. EPJ B. 2004, 41:113-121.
11. Ideker T., Sharan R. Protein networks in disease. Genome Res. 2008, 18:644-652.
12. Gardy J.L., et al. Whole-genome sequencing and social-network analysis of a tuberculosis outbreak. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364:730-739.
13. Valente T.M. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc. Netw. 1996, 18:69-89.
14. Acemoglu D., et al. Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks. Math. Oper. Res. 2013, 38:1-27.
15. Jackson M.O. An overview of social networks and economic applications. The Handbook of Social Economics 2010, 511-585. Elsevier. J. Benhabib (Ed.).
16. Janssen M.A., et al. Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11:15.
17. Woodward G., et al. Body size in ecological networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:402-409.
18. Mulder C., Elser J.J. Soil acidity, ecological stoichiometry and allometric scaling in grassland food webs. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15:2730-2738.
19. Thompson R.M., et al. Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:689-697.
20. Montoya J.M., et al. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 2006, 442:259-264.
21. Petchey O.L., et al. Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:4191-4196.
22. Reiss J., et al. Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:505-514.
23. Barabasi A.L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286:509-551.
24. Harary F. Graph Theory 1969, Addison Wesley.
25. Haines-Young R. Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian belief networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35:681-6992.
26. Macfadyen S., et al. Do differences in food web structure between organic and conventional farms affect the ecosystem service of pest control?. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:229-238.
27. Rathwell K.J., Peterson G.D. Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17:24.
28. Costanza R., Kubiszewski I. The authorship structure of 'ecosystem services' as a transdisciplinary field of scholarship. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:16-25.
29. Mulder C., et al. 10 years later: revisiting priorities for science and society a decade after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2015, 53:1-53.
30. Tallis H., et al. Working together: a call for inclusive conservation. Nature 2014, 515:27-28.
31. Tavoni A., Levin S. Managing the climate commons at the nexus of ecology, behaviour and economics. Nat. Clim. Cha. 2014, 4:1057-1063.
32. Ma A., Mondragón R.J. Rich-cores in networks. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0119678.
33. Pascual M., Dunne J.A. From small to large ecological networks in a dynamic world. Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs 2006, 3-24. Oxford University Press. M. Pascual, J.A. Dunne (Eds.).
34. Jordán F., et al. Trophic field overlap: a new approach to quantify keystone species. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:2899-2907.
35. Ernstson H., et al. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of stockholm. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15:28.
36. Narloch U., et al. How to achieve fairness in payments for ecosystem services? Insights from agrobiodiversity conservation auctions. Land Use Policy 2013, 35:107-118.
37. Hagen M., et al. Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2012, 46:89-120.
38. Stewart R.I.A., et al. Mesocosm experiments as a tool for ecological climate-change research. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2013, 48:71-181.
39. Shmida A.V.I., Wilson M.V. Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 1985, 12:1-20.
40. Palmer M.A., et al. Socioenvironmental sustainability and actionable science. BioScience 2012, 62:5-6.
41. Mace G.M., et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:19-26.
42. de Groot R.S., et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272.
43. Zimmermann H. OSI reference model - the ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection. IEEE T. Commun. 1980, 28:425-432.
44. Networks of Networks: The Last Frontier of Complexity 2014, Springer International Publishing. G. D'Agostino, A. Scala (Eds.).
45. Albert R., et al. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 2000, 406:378-382.
46. Pocock M.J.O., et al. The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science 2012, 335:973-977.
47. Chan K.M.A., et al. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 2012, 62:744-756.
48. Dicks L.V., et al. A transparent process for 'evidence-informed' policy making. Cons. Lett. 2014, 7:119-125.
49. McInerny G.J., et al. Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29:148-157.
50. Pocock M.J.O., et al. The visualisation of ecological networks, and their use as a tool for engagement, advocacy and management. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2016, 54. (in press).
51. Vespignani A. Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science 2009, 325:425-428.
52. Bohan D.A., et al. National-scale regulation of the weed seedbank by carabid predators. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:888-898.
53. Anderson P.W. More is different. Science 1972, 177:393-396.
54. Cohen J.E., et al. Food webs are more than the sum of their tritrophic parts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:22335-22340.
55. Montoya J.M., et al. Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. Ecology 2009, 90:2426-2433.
56. Pimm S.L. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 1984, 307:321-326.
57. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1973, 4:1-23.
58. Trichard A., et al. The relative effects of local management and landscape context on weed seed predation and carabid functional groups. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2013, 14:235-254.
59. Bohan D.A., et al. Spatial dynamics of predation by carabid beetles on slugs. J. Anim. Ecol. 2000, 69:367-379.