A nonstationary space-time gaussian process model for partially converged simulation

SIAM-ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 57-78

  Picheny, Victor ^a   Ginsbourger, David ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computer experiments; Covariance kernels; Kriging

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC);

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; DESIGN PARAMETERS; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; NON-STATIONARY COVARIANCE; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84961749016     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21662525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/120882834     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. N. Alexandrov, R. Lewis, C. Gumbert, L. Green, and P. Newman (2000), Optimization with variable-fidelity models applied to wing design, in Proceedings of the 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
2. N. Cressie (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, revised ed., Wiley, New York.
3. A. Dadone and B. Grossman (2000), Progressive optimization of inverse fluid dynamic design problems, Comput. & Fluids, 29, pp. 1–32.
4. A. Dadone and B. Grossman (2003), Fast convergence of inviscid fluid dynamic design problems, Comput. & Fluids, 32, pp. 607–627.
5. A. Forrester, N. Bressloff, and A. Keane (2006), Optimization using surrogate models and partially converged computational fluid dynamics simulations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 462, pp. 2177–2204.
6. A. Forrester, A. Keane, and N. Bressloff (2006), Design and analysis of “noisy” computer experiments, AIAA J., 44, pp. 2331–2339.
7. A. Forrester, A. Sóbester, and A. Keane (2007), Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 463, pp. 3251–3269.
8. S. Gano, J. Renaud, J. Martin, and T. Simpson (2006), Update strategies for kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 32, pp. 287–298.
9. C. Gumbert, P. Newman, and G. Hou (2001), Simultaneous aerodynamic analysis and design optimization (SAADO) for a 3-d flexible wing, in Proceedings of the 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
10. Z. Han, R. Zimmermann, and S. Görtz (2010), A new cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling of aerodynamic data, in Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, pp. 2010–1225.
11. N. Hansen (2006), The CMA evolution strategy: A comparing review, in Towards a New Evolutionary Computation, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 75–102.
12. D. Huang, T. Allen, W. Notz, and R. Miller (2006), Sequential kriging optimization using multiple-fidelity evaluations, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 32, pp. 369–382.
13. D. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. Welch (1998), Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, J. Global Optim., 13, pp. 455–492.
14. M. Kennedy and A. O’Hagan (2000), Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available, Biometrika, 87, pp. 1–13.
15. P. Kyriakidis and A. Journel (1999), Geostatistical space–time models: A review, Math. Geol., 31, pp. 651–684.
16. J. Laurenceau and P. Sagaut (2008), Building efficient response surfaces of aerodynamic functions with kriging and cokriging, AIAA J., 46, pp. 498–507.
17. R. M. Lewis and S. G. Nash (2005), Model problems for the multigrid optimization of systems governed by differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26, pp. 1811–1837.
18. G. Matheron (1969), Le krigeage universel, Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathématique, Fontainebleau, France.
19. P. Qian and C. Wu (2008), Bayesian hierarchical modeling for integrating low-accuracy and high-accuracy experiments, Technometrics, 50, pp. 192–204.
20. C. Rasmussen and C. Williams (2006), Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. O. Roustant, D. Ginsbourger, and Y. Deville (2012), DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by Kriging-based metamodeling and optimization, J. Stat. Software, 51, pp. 1–55.
22. J. Sacks, W. Welch, T. Mitchell, and H. Wynn (1989), Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statist. Sci., 4, pp. 409–435.
23. T. Santner, B. Williams, and W. Notz (2003), The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Springer, New York.
24. M. Stein (1999), Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging, Springer, New York.
25. M. Stein (2002), The screening effect in kriging, Ann. Statist., 30, pp. 298–323.
26. W. Yamazaki and D. Mavriplis (2011), Derivative-enhanced variable fidelity surrogate modeling for aerodynamic functions, in Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Orlando, FL.