Numerosity representations in crows obey the Weber-Fechner law

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 283, Issue 1827, 2016, Pages

  Ditz, Helen M ^a   Nieder, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Corvid; Corvus corone; Logarithmic scaling; Magnitude; Number

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL COMMUNITY; NUMERICAL METHOD; PASSERINE; PHYLOGENETICS; PRIMATE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALIA; AVES; CORVIDA; CORVIDAE; CORVUS CORONE; PRIMATES; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; COGNITION; CORVUS; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TELENCEPHALON;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; CROWS; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TELENCEPHALON;

EID: 84961577239     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0083     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Dacke M, Srinivasan MV. 2008 Evidence for counting in insects. Anim. Cogn. 11, 683-689. (doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0159-y)
2. Gross HJ, Pahl M, Si A, Zhu H, Tautz J, Zhang S. 2009 Number-based visual generalisation in the honeybee. PLoS ONE 4, e4263. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004263)
3. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A. 2011 Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 119, 281-287. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.022)
4. Bisazza A, Tagliapietra C, Bertolucci C, Foà A, Agrillo C. 2014 Non-visual numerical discrimination in a blind cavefish (Phreatichthys andruzzii). J. Exp. Biol. 217, 1902-1909. (doi:10.1242/jeb.101683)
5. Uller C, Jaeger R, Guidry G, Martin C. 2003 Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian. Anim. Cogn. 6, 105-112. (doi:10.1007/s10071-003-0167-x)
6. Krusche P, Uller C, Dicke U. 2010 Quantity discrimination in salamanders. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 1822-1828. (doi:10.1242/jeb.039297)
7. Emmerton J, Renner JC. 2006 Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons. Learn. Behav. 34, 176-192. (doi:10.3758/BF03193193)
8. Scarf D, Hayne H, Colombo M. 2011 Pigeons on par with primates in numerical competence. Science 334, 1664. (doi:10.1126/science.1213357)
9. Meck WH, Church RM. 1983 A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 9, 320-334. (doi:10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.320)
10. McComb K, Packer C, Pusey AE. 1994 Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim. Behav. 47, 379-387. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1052)
11. Vonk J, Beran MJ. 2012 Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears (Ursus americanus). Anim. Behav. 84, 231-238. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.001)
12. Brannon EM, Terrace HS. 1998 Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science 282, 746-749. (doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.746)
13. Beran MJ. 2007 Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 33, 42. (doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.1.42)
14. Wilson ML, Kahlenberg SM, Wells M, Wrangham RW. 2012 Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 83, 277-291. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.11.004)
15. Nieder A. 2013 Coding of abstract quantity by ‘number neurons’ of the primate brain. J. Comp. Physiol. A 199, 1-16. (doi:10.1007/s00359-012-0763-9)
16. Koehler O. 1951 The ability of birds to ‘count’. Bull. Anim. Behav. 9, 41-45.
17. Lyon BE. 2003 Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422, 495-499. (doi:10.1038/nature01505)
18. Hunt S, Low J, Burns KC. 2008 Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2373-2379. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0702)
19. Bogale BA, Aoyama M, Sugita S. 2014 Spontaneous discrimination of food quantities in the jungle crow, Corvus macrorhynchos. Anim. Behav. 94, 73-78. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.012)
20. Ujfalussy D, Miklósi A, Bugnyar T, Kotrschal K. 2013 Role of mental representations in quantity judgments by jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J. Comp. Psychol. 128, 11-20. (doi:10.1037/a0034063)
21. Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K. 2005 Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 308, 1934-1937. (doi:10.1126/science.1108841)
22. Pepperberg IM. 2010 Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African grey parrot: labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology 75, 37-61. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00641.x)
23. Xia L, Emmerton J, Siemann M, Delius JD. 2001 Pigeons (Columba livia) learn to link numerosities with symbols. J. Comp. Psychol. 115, 83. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.83)
24. Emery NJ, Clayton NS. 2004 Comparing the complex cognition of birds and primates. In Comparative vertebrate cognition (eds LJ Rogers, G Kaplan), pp. 3-55. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25. Smirnova A, Zorina Z, Obozova T, Wasserman E. 2015 Crows spontaneously exhibit analogical reasoning. Curr. Biol. 25, 256-260. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.063)
26. Clayton NS, Emery NJ. 2015 Avian models for human cognitive neuroscience: a proposal. Neuron 86, 1330-1342. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.024)
27. Veit L, Nieder A. 2013 Abstract rule neurons in the endbrain support intelligent behaviour in corvid songbirds. Nat. Commun. 4, 2878 (doi:10.1038/ncomms3878)
28. Veit L, Hartmann K, Nieder A. 2014 Neuronal correlates of visual working memory in the corvid endbrain. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 34, 7778-7786. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0612-14.2014)
29. Moll FW, Nieder A. 2015 Cross-modal associative mnemonic signals in crow endbrain neurons. Curr. Biol. 25, 2196-2201. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.013)
30. Veit L, Pidpruzhnykova G, Nieder A. 2015 Associative learning rapidly establishes neuronal representations of upcoming behavioral choices in crows. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15 208-15213. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1509760112)
31. Koehler O. 1941 Vom Erlernen unbenannter Anzahlen bei Vogeln. Naturwiss. Berlin 29, 201-218. (doi:10.1007/BF01481755)
32. Smirnova AA, Lazareva OF, Zorina ZA. 2000 Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 73, 163-176. (doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.73-163)
33. Moll FW, Nieder A. 2014 The long and the short of it: rule-based relative length discrimination in carrion crows, Corvus corone. Behav. Processes 107, 142-149. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.009)
34. Bogale BA, Kamata N, Mioko K, Sugita S. 2011 Quantity discrimination in jungle crows, Corvus macrorhynchos. Anim. Behav. 82, 635-641. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.025)
35. Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser M. 2002 The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol. Sci. 13, 150-156. (doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00427)
36. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E. 2004 Core systems of number. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 307-314. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002)
37. Hauser MD, Carey S, Hauser LB. 2000 Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 829-833. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1078)
38. Gordon P. 2004 Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science 306, 496-499. (doi:10.1126/science.1094492)
39. Pica P, Lemer C, Izard V, Dehaene S. 2004 Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 306, 499-503. (doi:10.1126/science.1102085)
40. Moyer RS, Landauer TK. 1967 Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215, 1519-1520. (doi:10.1038/2151519a0)
41. Dehaene S. 1992 Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 44, 1-42. (doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N)
42. Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L. 1998 Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci. 21, 355-361. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01263-6)
43. Emmerton J. 2001 Avian visual cognition. In Birds’ judgments of number and quantity (ed. RG Cook). See www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/emmerton.
44. Ditz HM, Nieder A. 2015 Neurons selective to the number of visual items in the corvid songbird endbrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7827-7832. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1504245112)
45. Cantlon JF, Brannon EM. 2006 Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychol. Sci. 17, 401-406. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01719.x)
46. Merten K, Nieder A. 2009 Compressed scaling of abstract numerosity representations in adult humans and monkeys. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 333-346. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21032)
47. Nieder A, Miller EK. 2003 Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 37, 149-157. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01144-3)
48. Izard V, Dehaene S. 2008 Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition 106, 1221-1247. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.004)
49. Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke E, Pica P. 2008 Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320, 1217-1220. (doi:10.1126/science.1156540)
50. Jarvis ED et al. 2005 Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 151-159. (doi:10.1038/nrn1606)
51. Evans S. 2000 General discussion II: amniote evolution. In Evolutionary developmental biology of the cerebral cortex (eds GR Bock, G Cardew), pp. 109-113. New York, NY: Wiley.
52. Hoffmann A, Rüttler V, Nieder A. 2011 Ontogeny of object permanence and object tracking in the carrion crow, Corvus corone. Anim. Behav. 82, 359-367. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.012)
53. Fechner GT. 1860 Elemente der Psychophysik (vol. III). Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf and Härtel.
54. Stevens SS. 1861 To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science 133, 80-86. (doi:10.1126/science.133.3446.80)
55. van Oeffelen MP, Vos PG. 1982 A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Percept. Psychophys. 32, 163-170. (doi:10.3758/BF03204275)
56. Davis H, Pérusse R. 2010 Numerical competence: from backwater to mainstream of comparative psychology. Behav. Brain Sci. 11, 602-615. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X00053693)
57. Hanus D, Call J. 2007 Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. J. Comp. Psychol.9 121, 241-249. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.3.241)
58. Cantlon JF, Brannon EM. 2007 Basic math in monkeys and college students. PLoS Biol. 5, e328. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050328)
59. Rugani R, Regolin L, Vallortigara G. 2010 Imprinted numbers: newborn chicks’ sensitivity to number vs. continuous extent of objects they have been reared with. Dev. Sci. 13, 790-797. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00936.x)
60. Viswanathan P, Nieder A. 2013 Neuronal correlates of a visual ‘sense of number’ in primate parietal and prefrontal cortices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11187-11192. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1308141110)
61. Whalen J, Gallistel CR, Gelman R. 1999 Nonverbal counting in humans: the psychophysics of number representation. Psychol. Sci. 10, 130-137. (doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00120)
62. Beran MJ, Johnson-Pynn JS, Ready C. 2008 Quantity representation in children and rhesus monkeys: linear versus logarithmic scales. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 100, 225-233. (doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.003)
63. Frank MC, Everett DL, Fedorenko E, Gibson E. 2008 Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition 108, 819-824. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007)
64. Evans TA, Beran MJ, Harris EH, Rice DF. 2009 Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim. Cogn. 12, 97-105. (doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0174-z)
65. Garland A, Beran MJ, McIntyre J, Low J. 2014 Relative quantity judgments between discrete spatial arrays by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and New Zealand robins (Petroica longipes). J. Comp. Psychol. 128, 307-317. (doi:10.1037/a0036484)
66. Garland A, Low J, Burns KC. 2012 Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins (Petroica longipes). Anim. Cogn. 15, 1129-1140. (doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0537-3)
67. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A, Butterworth B. 2012 Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies. PLoS ONE 7, e31923 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031923)
68. Jordan KE, Brannon EM. 2006 Weber’s Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim. Cogn. 9, 159-172. (doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0017-8)
69. Agrillo C, Bisazza A. 2014 Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities: a comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals. J. Neurosci. Methods 234, 82-91. (doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.027)
70. Viswanathan P, Nieder A. 2015 Differential impact of behavioral relevance on quantity coding in primate frontal and parietal neurons. Curr. Biol. 25, 1259-1269. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.025)